While Iran was experiencing a drought Iranian Muslims must have wondered why Allah would allow such a thing to happen.  Perhaps Iranian Leaders got nervous that the people would blame them some how.  What to do?  Blame Israel of course!  Brig. Gen. Gholam Reza Jalali, in charge of Iran's civil-defense organization explained that: "

"Joint teams from Israel and one of the neighboring countries make the clouds entering into Iran barren. Moreover, we are faced with the cases of cloud theft and snow theft," he said.

Jalali did not name the other country he believed was stealing Iranian clouds and snow.

     This is not the first time Iranian leaders have blamed other countries for their drought.   In 2011, then-Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad accused Western countries of causing a drought in Iran. He also accused Western states of creating the HIV virus to weaken the developing world and create a market for pharmaceuticals.

    In 2003, the northern Nigerian state of Kano backed Muslim religious leaders in opposing an immunization program, claiming it was a Western plot to make people infertile.  Health experts say this led to many people becoming infected by polio.

  In an interview published in the London based Arabic newspaper al-Shark al-Awsat, Yousef Abu Safieh, the Palestinian Minister of Environment, accused Israel of spreading carcinogens to the Palestinians by manufacturing drinks containing Sweet and Low.  He also said that the Egyptians confiscated two Israeli truckloads of toys that were highly radioactive. The trucks were en route, he said, to Palestinian children. (frontpagemag.com 6/16/05)

Here is a video of a Palestinian Authority mayor repeating the allegation in 2013.

I (the author of this website) was in Israel when I was 11 years old and I remember that Palestinian Arabs would leave booby trapped objects in parks and when I left something in the park some Israeli grabbed it thinking it might be an explosive.  I never encountered an explosive object myself but I remember that was a concern.  This is an example of Palestinian Arabs accusing Israelis of what Palestinian Arabs are guilty of.

  Arutz 7 reported on May 22, 01 that the Palestinian Authority accused the Israel Defense Forces of dropping poisoned chocolate candies to Palestinian children. 

   A front-page declaration in the official PA newspaper Al-Hayat Al-Jadida on Aug. 14, 2001, claimed that "the occupation is using naked women to hunt down intifada youth." (Jerusalem Post, Aug.15, 2001).  Ironically it was the Palestinians who used a woman to lure an Israeli teenager to his death (Jerusalem Post 1/19/01)

   The official PA newspaper Al-Hayat Al-Jadida reported on Dec. 24, 2001, that "When the occupying authority holds the bodies of martyrs ... they steal body parts of the martyrs." Similarly, Arafat said on Al Jazeera Television on January 13, 2002, that the Israelis "murder our kids and use their organs as spare parts."

   Speaking to reporters on July 20, 2004, Arafat alleged that Israel uses depleted- uranium bullets, as part of its plot to "cause cancer that is like Hiroshima and Nagasaki."

    After Arafat died a former senior aide Ahmed Abdul Rahman, claimed that an Israeli assassin killed the Palestinian leader by blowing a slow-acting poison into his ear.   (Ex-aide Israeli assassin poisoned Arafat in Ear, worldnetdaily.com 11/17/05)  Tzi Ben Gedalyahu reported that (PA: Americans Gave OK to Poison Arafat, Israel National News 11/18/05):

Bassam Abu Sharif, former advisor to Arafat, said on a Palestinian Authority (PA) television program that he warned Arafat that Israeli officials were planning to poison him with the knowledge of the American government.  

"The Israelis planned to kill him by poison, because of Sharon's promise to the Americans that [Arafat] will not be killed by bombing," Abu Sharif told Arab viewers. He continued,

"According to the confirmed information I have, [Defense Minister Sha'ul] Mofaz spoke to [Prime Minister Ariel] Sharon in the following manner: 'This is an opportunity to get rid of Yasser Arafat...' Sharon was silent for a moment, and then looked [at Mofaz and said], 'Only if it would be done in a way that the accusing finger won't be pointed at Israel.' These are the exact words."

Abu Sharif also stated that France, where Arafat died after being hospitalized, knew about the alleged poisoning but hid it in order to prevent "igniting" Arabs. However, he added that "that every Palestinian will see it as his duty to avenge [the death of] Yasser Arafat."
 

The PA ambassador in Sri Lanka, Attalah Quiba declared that Israel killed Arafat with a high-technology laser. Quiba informed a news converence that two Israelis who met Arafat on the day he fell ill used a laser device to attack him, and that tests of Arafats blood in 16 coutnries revealed that he had been poisoned by high technology.

On August 11, 2007 Arafats personal physician Dr. Ashraf al-Kurdi, disclosed that Yasser Arafat had the deadly HIV virus in his bloodstream when he died. WorldnetDaily reported that:

Dr. Ashraf al-Kurdi, Arafat's personal physician, began telling Al Jazeera during a live interview he knew that Arafat had HIV in his bloodstream at the time of his death, but the satellite Arabic network immediately cut him off when he made the accusation.

Hours later, a Jordanian news website Amman quoted al-Kurdi as saying someone injected HIV into Arafat's body before he died and that the real cause of the Palestinian leader's death was poison

While Arafat was ill and after his death, some publicly speculated he was dying of AIDS.

In his book "Liberalism is a Mental Disorder", radio talk-show host Michael Savage speculated Arafat had died of AIDS. Savage also slammed much of the U.S. news media for its posthumous characterization of Arafat as "innovative" and a "freedom fighter," stating the PLO leader was a notorious terrorist leader.

The homosexual site 365Gay.com, which deals regularly with issues related to HIV/AIDS, ran a piece reminding readers that for several years it had been suggested Arafat was bisexual and could have contracted the disease.

"If suggestions that Arafat has AIDS are true, it is doubtful it would be made public," wrote its European bureau chief Malcolm Thornberry.

National Review diarist David Frum suggested in a column Arafat contracted AIDS from homosexual sex with his bodyguards.

Ion Pacepa, who was deputy chief of Romanian foreign intelligence under the Ceausescu regime and who defected to the West in 1978, stated in his memoirs the Romanian government bugged Arafat and had recordings of the Arab leader in orgies with his security detail In a WND interview, the National Security Agency's former analyst of Arafat's communications said the U.S. had information indicating the Palestinian leader may have been a homosexual who preyed on teenage boys.

James J. Welsh, who in the early 1970s monitored communications for the NSA related to Arafat's Fatah movement, said, "One of the things we looked for when we were intercepting Fatah communications were messages about Ashbal [Lion cub] members who would be called to Beirut from bases outside of Beirut. The Ashbal were often orphaned or abandoned boys who were brought into the organization, ostensibly to train for later entry into Fedayeen fighter units.

"Arafat always had several of these 13-15 year old boys in his entourage. We figured out that he would often recall several of these boys to Beirut just before he would leave for a trip outside Lebanon. It proved to be a good indicator of Arafat's travel plans. While Arafat did have a regular security detail, many of those thought to be security personnel the teenage boys were actually there for other purposes," Welsh said.

   After Arafat's death and during the regime of Mahmoud Abbas, the Palestinian media continues incitement against Israel.  Aaron Klein in an article in wnd.com wrote (Palestinians Claim Israelis X-rayed Woman to Death 5/2/05):

The official Palestinian media, credited by many for reformist policies reportedly implemented following the election of Palestinian Authority president Mahmoud Abbas, claimed last week Israeli forces X-rayed a woman to death at a checkpoint.

   This is very clever propaganda because it makes the most innocuous defensive measures that the Israelis are forced to take into a dastardly deed against the Palestinians.  I saw a similar approach concerning the wall/fence that Israel built to keep out suicide bombers and terrorists.  The allegations became, the wall is walling us in and creating a prison.  I walked passed a Palestinian propaganda poster once and they quoted someone as saying something to the effect of:  "They've walled off the sky, I can't see the sky.

    The Palestinian Authority accuses Israel of conducting horrific Nazi-like medical experiments on Palestinian prisoners. These fabrications have been featured repeatedly in the Palestinian Authority's official newspaper, Al-Hayat Al-Jadida, which is under the direct authority of Mahmoud Abbas.

According to Palestinian Media Watch 7/10/2008:

In the past week alone there were three new examples of this libel:

"The method employed by the Israeli Occupation in which they [are] instigating slow death ... doctors in Israeli prison clinics use the prisoners as guinea pigs for clinical drug testing under the pretense of 'treatment.'" [Al-Hayat Al-Jadida, July 6, 2008]

"Many of the male and female inmates received injections from needles they had not seen before, and which caused their hair and facial hair to fall out permanently ... others lost their sanity, or their mental condition is constantly deteriorating... and some are suffering from infertility." [Al-Hayat Al-Jadida, July 4, 2008]

"The doctors in these prison clinics are using the prisoners as guinea pigs for clinical testing of drugs and treatment-methods." [Al-Hayat Al-Jadida, July 3, 2008]

MEMRI has released an English transcript of an address given by a Muslim religious leader in Egypt in February 2009, in which he explains that PEPSI is actually an acronym for "Pay Every Penny to Save Israel." 

In addition, a member of the Hamas terrorist organizations parliament in Gaza made similar accusations against Pepsi in 2008. Speaking with official Hamas TV station Al-Aqsa TV on April 23, 2008, Hamas MP Salem Salamah said, There are companies established by the colonialists and occupiers - large companies with branches all over the world, like Pepsi, Pepsi Cola. This is a well-known company. Pepsi is an acronym. P-E-P-S-I - Pay Every Pence to Save Israel. Pay every pence - pence is one-hundredth of a dollar to save Israel. Pay every pence to save Israel
 

    Why does the PA media create such paranoia? Al-Hayat Al-Jadida explained that such reports about such "experiments" performed on Palestinian prisoners serve to "mobilize each and every human-being as such... to actively participate in activities aimed at their release and their return to freedom, properly meant as a return to life... all of us! all of us! all of us! - to confront the enemy in the war it wages." [Al-Hayat Al-Jadida, Sept. 3, 2007]  Creation of paranoia is a way to mobilize Palestinian Arabs to confront and fight the Israelis.

In June 2005, PA's official news service WAFA "reported" that (Irrelevant Visions, Jerusalem Post 6/24/05)

 Israelis were sending hordes of wild pigs to Palestinian villages around Hawarah village in the Nablus district to attack them and destroy their fields.

The PA's official news service even interviewed Hawarah Mayor Mansour Dmaidi, who backed these ludicrous and incendiary statements.

   After Sharon visited the temple mount the Palestinian Arabs started a massive shooting campaign against Jews living in Israel.  Although the Palestinians claimed to the West it was because of Sharon Abu Mazen himself said on Palestinian radio that the visit was "only a pretext." Although the Palestinian Authority is responsible for the escalation of violence they blame the Jews for it.  In response to a call from Colin Powell,  about a terrorist attack in Azur Feb 14, 2001, Palestinian Authority Chairman Yasser Arafat said that Israel is responsible for the military escalation endangering any potential prospects for peace in the region.

    Daniel Pipes in an article titled Arafat's Bedroom Farce (frontpagemag.com 11/10/04) wrote about the creation of paranoia against Israel resulting from the last days of Arafat.

What Arafat might be dying of has been conspicuously not mentioned, leading to many speculations. Of course, some Palestinians have hatched a conspiracy theory about Israel poisoning Arafat. The PLO's news service, WAFA, with a straight face demands an inquiry into the exact manner of his poisoning. "We have the right to know the type, the source of the poison as well as the antidote and how to get it," writes WAFA's political editor. More interesting, though, is the plausible thesis that the "president" is dying of AIDS, especially given his reputed pre-nuptial activities. David Frum elaborates on this hypothesis in National Review Online:

We know he has a blood disease that is depressing his immune system. We know that he has suddenly dropped considerable weight possibly as much as 1/3 of all his body weight. We know that he is suffering intermittent mental dysfunction. What does this sound like?

Former Romanian intelligence chief Ion Pacepa tells in his very interesting memoirs that the Ceaucescu regime taped Arafat's orgies with his body guards. If true, Arafat would a great deal to conceal from his people and his murderously anti-homosexual supporters in the Islamic world.

   Although Arafat had access to doctors, food, running water and electricity in his compound, Abu Qusai, a spokesman for Arafat's al-Aqsa Martyrs Brigades said that Israel was to blame for Arafat's death, by forcing him to live in primitive conditions in his headquarters in the West Bank city of Ramallah.  He said:

"Our groups together with brothers from other factions took to the battlefield with the enemy to make it pay the price ... The next days will witness violent clashes with the Zionists everywhere."
.

In Nov? 2002 Muslims murdered Bonnie Witherall, an American nurse and missionary while she was opening the clinic in which she ministered to Lebanon's poor. Michael Medved wrote that:

An influential Muslim publication in Lebanon, "The Pulpit of the Calling," denounced the Christian and Missionary Alliance in which Mrs. Witherall participated as "a Zionist organization. They destroy the fighting spirit of the children, especially of the Palestinian youth, by teaching them not to fight the Jews, for the Palestinians to forgive the Jews ".

   Amir Taheri wrote Motqada el Sadr's attempt to create paranoia against the Americans in Iraq.  He wrote that Sadr:

hoped that hiding in the "holy" shrines of Najaf and Karbala would provoke their destruction by the Americans, thus triggering worldwide Shiite rage against Washington. 

When the Americans refused to play that role, Sadr ordered his own men to damage part of the shrines, blamed the Americans, then brought in arab satellite TV cameras to record "the greatest crime of the United States."

The hoax failed:  The people of Najaf and Karbala knew who had damaged the buildings, and soon organized marches calling for Sadr and his henchmen followers to leave town.  (The marchers, of course received no publicity in the Arab and Western media.)

   In medieval times the Christians spread the blood libel about the Jews.  In modern times the Moslems are doing and doing it with modern technology.  For a video clip of the Syrian version of the blood libel click here.

Palestinian Media Watch Reported on April 5, 2009:

   One thing that's fascinating about this is how it projects radical Islamic attitudes towards Jews on Jews.  Radical Muslims believe it is their duty to hate the Jew and to kill the Jew.  The skit explains that Jews wash their hands in Muslim blood.  Click on the picture below to see a videoclip of Muslims holding up their hands covered with Jewish blood.

Egypt is preparing Egyptians to go to war with Israel. The problem is that Israel signed a peace treaty. So they produced a film called A Girl From Israel. Nonie Darwish wrote how in the film an:

Israeli father is shown trying to shake hands with Egyptians, while talking about peace and the normalization of relations.  The Egyptians, however, regard him with utter disgust, rejecting his extended hand. In this way, the Israeli father is understood to be insincere in his quest for peace. In a final act of Jewish treachery, the film ends with the killing of the Egyptian young man, the only character to befriend Jews, at the hands of his Israeli friend!

The lesson is that not only are Israelis insincere in their quest for peace but also that they kill you if you befriend them.

The following is an excerpt from an interview with Egyptian researcher Muhammad Galaa Idris, which aired on Al-Rahma TV, September 23, 2011:

The Jews were responsible for all the depravity that has spread in society. ... The Jews were behind the spread of immorality, prostitution, and licentiousness in Europe. They were behind the spread of all sins, and they are to this day. This is written in The Protocols of the Elders of Zion. We've discussed this. Moral corruption is part of the conspiracy...  The Jews have managed to brainwash Europe.

Hindus create paranoia towards Christians. British Parliamentarian David Alton wrote to Nepalese officials (wnd.com 5/27/07).

"I am disturbed by reports that [a Hindu group] wishes to kill the main Christian leaders in Nepal and to destroy the church buildings. Hatred is also being incited in local newspapers against Christians. I am told that Christians have been falsely accused of involvement in Maoist activity, drug trafficking and trafficking of girls for prostitution.

The reality is that the churches are doing good works such as providing homes for orphans, help for the poorest of the poor, giving humanitarian and medical aid and education for the underprivileged as well as taking care of the spiritual welfare of the people.

IXAA Creation of Paranoia to Hide Motives of Conquest

Garry Greenwood, on his web site about the Mahikari, All the Emperor's Men wrote:

The notion of creating a perceived foe, which in this case is both the Jewish conspiracy and the frightening unknown world of spirits and demons, has proven very effective in diverting people's attention away from the real agendas of the Mahikari organisations. This is exactly what Hitler did.

   According to Garry Greenwood the agenda of Yoshikazu Okada the head of the Mahikari organization is world domination.

IXAB Creation of Paranoia to Avert Catastrophe

   Early in 1348, the Black Death struck Europe, spreading with terrifying rapidity... As more and more people were struck down, panic grew and the need to find the cause and destroy it.  Nicholls writes: 

It will be no surprise that blame fell on the Jews.  That spring, as deaths multiplied, Jews were attacked.  At Narbonne and Carcassonne, Jews were dragged from their homes and burned to death.

Clemente VI tried to stop this by issuing a bull in which he said that Christians who blamed the Jews for the plague had been "seduced by that liar, the Devil."   He pointed out that everybody, including Jews, was falling victim to the plague.   It existed equally where there were no Jews and where Jews did live they were suffering from it like their neighbors.  He was ignored.

IXB Creation of Paranoia To Prevent Conflict and Violence

   Amazingly people may create paranoia to prevent conflict and violence.   An example of this is an essay called "Tips for Parents and Schools Regarding the Anniversary of Sept. 11, 2001," prepared by Dr. Brian Lippincott of John F. Kennedy University in Orinda, Calif and recommended by the National Education Association. Professor Lippincott wrote that commemorative programs must avoid any suggestion that Islamic fanaticism can be blamed for the attacks explaining that:

protecting against harassment of our Arab American classmates and neighbors is most critical right now.

Here Dr. Lippincott is simply just advocating creation of delusion to protect Arab-Americans but he went further.  He wrote that:

"We must not repeat terrible mistakes," demanding discussion of "historical instances of American intolerance. Internment of Japanese Americans after Pearl Harbor and the backlash against Arab Americans during the Gulf War are obvious examples."

Michael Medved wrote in response to this (Commemorating 9-11: Blaming America, exonerating Islam, Worldnet Daily 8/19/02):

Examples of what, precisely? Of America's unprecedented goodness and generosity? Even at the height of the Gulf War (and, so far, during the War on Terror), Arab Americans experienced no significant "backlash" continuing to enjoy full civil rights and to sustain the conspicuous success that has characterized this hard-working ethnic group for nearly a century.

  Dr. Lippincott is distorting history and making America out to be the bad guy, he is creating paranoia to America and whitewashing Islam in order to protect Arab Americans.

   Lord Halifax was Neville Chamberlains Foreign Secretary (1938-40)   and has gone down in history as one of the architects of the Munich fiasco and  the disastrous policy  of appeasement that led to the Second World War.     He was also the author of the 1939 White Paper which restricted Jewish immigration to a trickle and doomed millions to death. An early admirer of Hitler and a Nazi sympathizer, he reportedly told the German leader:

 War would undoubtedly serve the purpose of all Jews, Communists and doctrinaires in the world for whom Nazism is anathema.

  Thus the only people who wanted to go to war were wicked Jewish Communists.   This was a convenient creation of paranoia to justify the prevention of conflict and violence.

   In 1971 John Kerry told Congress that U.S. troops in Vietnam:

personally raped, cut off ears, cut off heads, taped wires from portable telephones to human genitals and turned up the power, cut off limbs, blown up bodies, randomly shot at civlians, razed villages in a fashion reminiscent of Genghis Khan, shot cattle and dogs for fun, poisoned food stocks and generally ravaged the countryside of South Vietnam in addition to the normal ravage of war...

Nor, said Kerry were these

isolated incidents, but crimes committed on a day to day basis with the full awareness of officers at all levels of command.

   These claims all came from the "Winter Soldier Investigation".  Kerry just repeated the charges, leveled by 150 supposed Vietnam vets, word for word.  Two journalists with strong anti-war credentials, Neil Sheehan and James Reston, later exposed "Winter Soldier" as a mass of fabrications by people who hadn't even been to Vietnam (What Kerry Left Out, New York Post 8/1/04). Why were these charges fabricated.  Historian Guenter Lewy in his book America in Vietnam, wrote:  It is more likely that this inquiry, like others earlier and later, had primarily political motives and goals."  What political motives and goals would motivate such slander?  William Crandall a vet without an atrocity tale to tell who however, believed the allegations wrote: (What Did America Learn from the Winter Soldier Investigation)

We wanted to bring our brothers and sisters in uniform home alive and untainted by further involvement in such deeds.

My guess is that those who gave false testimony wanted America out of Vietnam.  Perhaps they thought that by slandering American soldiers they could convince the American public to end the war.

   The media reaction to all of this before the elections of Nov 2004, was to paint the vets who complained about Kerry as warmongers who didn't like Kerry because he was a peacenik. (worldnetdaily 10/22/04)

    Prime minister Sharon apparently believed that he was bringing peace to the Middle East by forcibly removing Jews living in Gaza, Judea and Samaria from their homes.  Perhaps he knew better and thought he was scoring points with America.  In order to prepare the public for violence against these people statements such as "The settlers are worse than terrorists," have emanated from his office (Israel National News 2/16/05).

IXC Creation of Paranoia to Protect Civil Liberties

   CAPPS II (Computer Assisted Passenger Prescreening system II) is an airline screening system designed to keep homicidal terrorists off of planes which verifies that a passenger is who he claims to be and checks whether government files list him as a terrorist suspect. 

   Heather MacDonald in an article titled Perils of 'Privacy' Extremists vs. Air Security (New York Post 4/26/04) wrote how organizations such as the ACLU made false charges regarding the infringements of civil liberties that would result from implementation of CAPP II in order to stop it.  She wrote about the paranoia of organizations such as the ACLU as follows:

Every proposed national security technology is a Rorschach test of the viewer's special paranoia.  Where the ACLU sees racial discrimination in CAPPS II, the libertarian Right sees the hand of left wing busybodies.  

   According to Ms. MacDonald Airlines that cooperated with the government in its effort to test whether computer technology could help identify terrorists now face hundreds of billions of dollars in class action   lawsuits and development of CAPPS II has come to a standstill and private sector cooperation with the War on Terror has evaporated.

Paul Eidelberg in an essay titled: The Cultural Left: Islams Ally (Freeman Center Email Broadcast 2/19/07) wrote:

The Cultural Left is waging a war against the Christian Right .  Cultural leftists fear Christian fundamentalists more than Islamic fundamentalists .  They see in religion a threat to unfettered personal freedom .  For the Cultural Left, freedom means the absence of any external moral constraint; it means complete moral autonomy, which logically includes moral depravity . 

IXD Creation of Paranoia to Stay Out of Jail

    James Clay, a former high school basketball coach in Ohio was sentenced to four years in prison for setting fire to his home, which prosecutors said he had done to portray himself as the victim of a hate crime.

Authorities who responded to the fire at James Clays house in Troy found a spray-painted racial slur on his car.

The 2007 fire came days after Clay, who is black, was charged with sexually assaulting a 15-year-old girl.

X Denial of Contradictory Evidence

   William Nicholls in his book Christian Antisemitism, A History of Hate, writes about the libel of host desecration.  He writes:

According to this calumny, the Jews obtained a consecrated host from the mass, with the assistance of a Christian who retained it from the administration of communion, took it to their synagogue or homes and subjected it to every indignity, including trampling on it and sticking pins into it... The accusation was made for the first time at Belitz, near Berlin; all the Jews of the town were burned.  One hundred instances of the charge have been recorded , in many cases leading to massacres.

This accusation is particularly bizarre, because it assumes that Jews themselves actually believe not only the doctrine of transubstantiation but also a particularly materialistic, and strictly speaking heretical, popular version of it.  Of course, no Jews believes such a doctrine in any form.  To a Jew, the host is simply a piece of bread...

   Christian in medieval times also believed the Jew was the devil.  As such the Jew supposedly had the foetor judaicus, the sulphurous smell of the devil.   The fact that they did not smell sulphurous was not taken as evidence that they were not the devil, bus simply that they were cunning and were able to hide the smell.

   Raphael Israeli in his article "The Oslo Delusion: The Collapse of Assumptions - Part 1, (Outpost August 2001, page 3) wrote how:

In May 1983, the Palestinians accused Israel of having "poisoned" schoolgirls in the West Bank, who were in fact fainting in a wave of mass hysteria.  The affair was taken up by the rest of the Arabs and Muslims, then by United Nations bodies and the Western press, which wondered "how the Jewish people, who had experienced the gas chambers, now treated the Palestinians in the same way."  Cries of "genocide" flew from all quarters, until an international medical inquiry team discovered it was, in fact, a case of mass hysteria.  But the Palestinians did not budge; they had adopted the much more "plausible" theory that the Jews had schemed to "sterilize" young Palestinian women in order to affect the demographic balance which was ticking adversely in their disfavor.

   Raphael gives other examples of this type of denial:

When the al-Aqsa mosque was burned by a mentally ill Australian tourist in 1969, Israel was directly blamed by the Palestinians and the entire Muslim world for having caused the arson.  The fact that the arsonist was apprehended and sentenced, that he was Christian, and that it was the Israelis who rushed to extinguish the fire, did nothing to exonerate the Jews from their guilt, because it is in their "nature" to perform acts of profanation. 

   Jedediah Purdy in his book Being America, wrote that whenever he asked Egyptians about September 11 there was:

Always the same inconsistency: we admire Osama for attacking America, but in fact it was the Israeli secret service that attacked America.

   According to Israel National News (1/22/04)

Sha'aban Abdel Raheem, the Egyptian singer who brought the Arab world the smash hit "Ana Bakra Isra'il ("I Hate Israel" www.israelnationalnews.com/news.php3?id=41433), has now come out with "Kharittat Al-Tariq" ("Road Map").   The new song features, among other themes, an accusation against the Americans for having carried out the World Trade Center attack. 

The lyrics say, "Hey people, it was only a tower, and I swear by God that they are the ones who pulled it down."  The new hit song "gives voice to widespread views in the Egyptian street regarding the September 11th events and the U.S.- Iraq standoff," according to an article in the Cairo Times weekly. Abdel Raheem sings that the U.S. purposely carried out the September 11th terrorist attacks on New York and Washington "to make people think that Arabs and Muslims are terrorists and were behind that disaster. Now the U.S. can do what it pleases to the Arab world since everyone thinks they are to blame," the Egyptian culture magazine detailed.

XB Creation of Paranoia to Explain Away Contradictory Evidence

      Jamie Glazov wrote an article in Frontpage Magazine titled Hating Valentines about the hatred of Valentines Day by both the radical feminist left and radical Islam.  He wrote:

In the West, meanwhile leftist feminists are not to be outdone by their jihadi allies in reviling and trying to kill Valentines Day. Throughout all Womens Studies Programs on American campuses, for instance, you will find the demonization of Valentines Day, since, as the disciples of Andrea Dworkin angrily explain, the day is a manifestation of how capitalist and homophobic patriarchs brainwash and oppress women and push them into spheres of powerlessness. As a person who spent more than a decade in academia, I was privileged to witness this grotesque attack and deconstruction of Valentines Day at close range. Feminist icons like Jane Fonda, meanwhile, help lead the attack on Valentines Day in society at large. As David Horowitz has documented, Fonda has led the campaign to transform this special day into V-Day (Violence against Women Day) which is, when it all comes down to it, a day of hate, featuring a mass indictment of men.

Why this hostility toward Valentine's Day?   My theory is that people like Andrea Dworkin and Jane Fonda believe that men are evil oppressors of women.  Valentine's Day is a day when men express their love toward women.  This is a threat to the beliefs of these Females.  They probably wants women to rebel against their evil male masters and see Valentine's day as sapping the motive to rebel. 

   In March 2016 the American College of Pediatrics listed a policy statement regarding transgenderism.  They wrote:

Pre-pubertal children who use puberty blockers to impersonate the opposite sex will require cross-sex hormones in late adolescence. This combination leads to permanent sterility. These children will never be able to conceive any genetically related children even via artificial reproductive technology. In addition, cross-sex hormones (testosterone and estrogen) are associated with dangerous health risks including but not limited to cardiac disease, high blood pressure, blood clots, stroke, diabetes, and cancer.7,8,9,10,11

Rates of suicide are nearly twenty times greater among adults who use cross-sex hormones and undergo sex reassignment surgery, even in Sweden which is among the most LGBTQ affirming countries. What compassionate and reasonable person would condemn young children to this fate knowing that after puberty as many as 88% of girls and 98% of boys will eventually accept reality and achieve a state of mental and physical health?

Conditioning children into believing a lifetime of chemical and surgical impersonation of the opposite sex is normal and healthful is child abuse. Endorsing gender discordance as normal via public education and legal policies will confuse children and parents, leading more children to present to gender clinics where they will be given puberty-blocking drugs. This, in turn, virtually ensures they will choose a lifetime of carcinogenic and otherwise toxic cross-sex hormones, and likely consider unnecessary surgical mutilation of their healthy body parts as young adults.

Did this lead the left to rethink their promotion of transgenderism?  You have got to be kidding, of course not.  Think Progress described the American College of Pediatricians as a hate group masquerading as pediatricians.

The Huffington Post wrote that Once again, Paul McHugh (one of the authors of the study) has used the ever more tarnished name of Johns Hopkins to distort science and spread transphobic misinformation.

What possible agenda could the left have to dismiss such important information.  The homosexual agenda is to promote acceptance of homosexual behavior but think that transgenderism offers them.  Supposing you are the female in a homosexual relationship.  You want to be female.  Acceptance of transgender hormones means you can be that much closer to being female and not be condemned for it. 

In short the left dismissed the study by creating paranoia toward the American College of Pediatricians. 

   When Israelis sent people to help the Haitians after a major earthquake (Jan 2010) it created a problem for those who wish to incite hatred toward the Jews.  The solution, warn the Haitians that the Israelis are stealing their organs.  The aid America sent created a problem for Hugo Chavez who does not want goodwill to exist in Latin America for the United States.  Chavez told Spanish newspaper ABC that the earthquake was the product of a "tectonic weapon" launched by the U.S. Navy in a test-run for the U.S.' ultimate target: Iran.  He also accused the United States of seeking a military occupation in Haiti.

Darwins theory of evolution is perhaps the greatest threat to religion. It challenges the very basic religious belief that God created man and the basic Christian and Jewish beliefs that he did so in 7 days. One Christian response has been to create paranoia to Darwin and equate him with Hitler.

Worldnetdaily, a Christian news web site promoted a documentary called Darwins Deadly Legacy. They quoted Jerry Newcomb, one of the documentarys creators as saying that Darwins theory has probably been responsible for more bloodshed than anything else in the history of humanity." According to a worldnetdaily article

Before the advent of Darwinian beliefs, said Newcombe, the Western world's basic concept was that man was made in the image of God, and was therefore valuable. But Darwin changed all that. "Karl Marx wouldnt embrace all (Darwin's) tenets, but said, 'This is a scientific theory on which we can base our theory of man,'" Newcomb told WND... "We talk about the link between Darwin and Hitler, and in the middle ground, eugenics," said Newcomb. "Darwin led to eugenics, which led directly to Hitler."

"To put it simply no Darwin, no Hitler," said Kennedy, who is host for the special. "Hitler tried to speed up evolution, to help it along, and millions suffered and died in unspeakable ways because of it."

Lets consider the assumptions here. One is that man is not valuable if he evolved. If we assumed are loved ones are a product of evolution does that make them any less valuable to us? Another assumption is that Darwinism is responsible for the crimes committed by those who claimed to believe in Karl Marxs theories. Karl Marx wanted to create a world that did not operate according to the paradigm of survival of the fittest. Karl Marx believed in socialism in which everyone gets equal pay no matter how fit or unfit they are. The idea that Hitler would not have existed without Darwinism is questionable, the Jews were seen as an evil group and persecuted by Christians long before Darwin, and Hitler is likely to have seen the Jews that way as well. There is nothing in Darwinism that says that Jews are in anyway inferior to anyone else. Hitler was trying to legitimize his hatred with science. Conquerors have conquered other groups and killed and subjugated them long before Darwin, in fact many of these conquerors did so in the name of religion which is challenged by Darwins theories. Darwin originally intended to join the ministry, but his study of nature made it clear to him that Church teachings were wrong.

   Baigent et. al., in their book, The Messianic Legacy, wrote about the way Tertullian dismissed evidence against Christianity with paranoia.  They wrote:

One can trace numerous specific elements in the Gospels to their origin not in history, but in the traditions surrounding Tammuz, Osiris, Attis, Adonis, Dionysos and Zoroaster,  Many of them, for example were supposed to have been born of a god and a virgin.  Mithraism exerted a particularly powerful influence on the coalescence of Christian tradition.  It postulated an apocalypse, a day of judgment, a resurrection of the flesh and a second coming of Mithras himself, who would finally defeat the principle of evil...  Baptism played a prominent role in Mithraic rites.  So, too, did the communal meal.  There is a passage in the Mithraic communion which is particularly interesting: 'He who shall not eat of my body nor drink of my blood so that he may be one with me and I with him, shall not be saved'. 

When Tertullian, one of the early Church Fathers, was confronted with this passage, he insisted it was the Devil, centuries in advance, parodying the Christian Communion in order to diminish the import of Jesus's words.

MEMRI reviewed sermons in Saudi Mosques and published their observations on September 26, 2002.  One was in regard to how Saudi preachers portray efforts to create religious harmony as evil.

International initiatives aimed at promoting interreligious harmony have been condemned by many Saudi preachers. In a sermon at a Mecca mosque, Sheikh Adnan Ahmad Siyami said, "[Islam] believes that only Islam and the 'Camp of Kufur' exist, and that there is no way to reach Paradise and to be delivered from Hell except by walking in the path of our Prophet Muhammad and joining Islam. Any other way leads to Hell. In light of this, my believing brethren, how can it be claimed that Judaism, Christianity, and Islam are all paths leading to Allah?!."

"Several years ago, a sinful call arose, which unfortunately garnered support from some clerics and preachers of this religion, Islam. [a call] for the unification of the monotheistic religions. They flaunted an empty and false slogan of 'religious harmony,' Christian-Islamic friendship, and uniting the three religions into a global religion'."

"The call for the unification of the religions is a call for the abolition of religious differences among people: No more Muslim and infidel. All will come under the unity of human harmony. This accursed call has ramifications that most certainly will shake Islam in the hearts of its people, leading them to the lowest of the levels of Hell.

   The concern of Westerners for women's right in Islamic countries is portrayed as an effort to undermine Islam.  MEMRI quotes a sermon at the Al-Huweish mosque in Al-Taif, by Sheikh Muhammad Al-Nimr:

Why do the West and the secular Westernizers focus on the [Muslim] woman?  The answer is that they grasped the status of the woman and her role in the building of the nation, and her influence on society, and therefore realized that if they corrupt the woman and manage to entice her into deviating from the path of righteousness, it will facilitate their infiltration of the Muslim strongholds. The satanic Jews say in their Protocols: 'We must get the woman. The day she stretches out her hand to us is the day of our triumph'.

Many people react to those who oppose their cherished beliefs by thinking the opposers are stupid or bad. I knew two people who disagreed on whether or not the United States should go to war with Iran. The person who felt that the United States should go to war argued that there will be war one way or another and it will be either with a nuclear armed Iran or an Iran without nuclear weapons. The person who thought that the United States should not go to war, reacted to that argument by accusing the person who made it of liking war. I happen to know that the person who made the argument for going to war with Iran hates war and violence but believes that sometimes it is the lesser of two evils. So why was he accused of liking war. Probably because the person who accused him doesnt want to believe that there is a legitimate argument to be made for war. To do that he creates paranoia to people who say that there is. He also accused the other person of being a fool which is another way to rationalize away counterarguments to ones cherished beliefs.

XC Creation of Paranoia to Gain Status

    Ann Coulter listed examples of hate crime hoaxes in an article titled Another Liberal Noose-ance, Frontpage Magazine 10/18/07.   Here is an excerpt from her article

In 1997, at Duke University, a black doll was found hanging by a noose from a tree at the precise spot where the Black Student Alliance was to be holding a rally against racism. Two black students later admitted they were the culprits and were immediately praised for bringing attention to the problem of racism on campus. Indeed, four years later the president of Duke gave a baccalaureate address nostalgically describing the hoax as a "protest" against racism. Next stop: the Nobel Peace Prize.

In 2003, vile racial epithets were scrawled on the dorm room doors at Ole Miss, producing mass protests and a "Say No to Racism" march. And then it turned out the graffiti had been written by black students, against whom no charges were brought. A "Say Yes to Racism" rally at Ole Miss was later canceled due to lack of interest.
In 2005, obscenity-laced racist and anti-Semitic messages appeared on dormitory walls at the College of Wooster in Ohio. The fliers were instantly blamed on "typical white males," even though all the letter I's in the epithets were dotted with little hearts. Breadcrumbs left by the culprits included the message "Vote Goldwater" among the obscenities. The matter was dropped and flushed down the memory hole when the perpetrators turned out to be a group of leftist students led by a black-studies major.

Just this year, anti-Muslim fliers were put out on the George Washington University campus by leftists, including a member of "Iraq Veterans Against War." When it was thought the leaflets were from the conservative group Young Americans For Freedom, the dean called for the expulsion of the culprits and the university demanded that YAF officers sign a statement disavowing "hate speech." But when it turned out leftists had distributed the fliers, the matter was dropped faster than Larry Craig was dropped from Mitt Romney's campaign.

Playing the game of He Who Is Offended First Wins, Americans seek status not by claiming to be rich or of royal lineage, but by portraying themselves as victims. In one recent hoax hate crime, a white woman professor at Claremont McKenna College said her car had been vandalized with racist and anti-Semitic graffiti, with the words "Shut Up!" spray-painted on the hood of her car.

She was not black or Jewish, but had recently converted to Judaism and spoke out against racism. So she was a victim! After the vandalism of her car, she promptly became Queen for a Day. Far from "silenced," this anonymous mountebank was given a national microphone to bore us with her race-gender-culture theories. The campus was shut down for a day for anti-racism rallies in the charlatan's honor. Then eyewitnesses identified her as the one who had spray-painted her own car, and the pity party was over.

XI Creation of Paranoia to Overcome Opposition

    Creation of paranoia is a way to justify violence against a group.  One way this is done is by labeling.  Jack Posobiec discusses this in the video below.

    The American left is hell bent on blaming Trump for everything.  Here is a good video about that.

In Charlottesville Virginia there were demonstrations for and against demolition of a statue of Robert E Lee.  In addition to peaceful people two violent groups attended the March, Antifa and Neo-Nazis both who engaged in violence.  After the demonstrations Trump pointed out that there were good people on both sides.  The left accused him of saying that the neo-Nazis were good people which he never said.  Here is a good video called the Charlottesville Lie.

     There were 2 mass shootings in the beginning of August one by a shooter who said he was angry at the Hispanic invasion of the United States. After the shootings President Trump implored the nation  to “condemn racism, bigotry and white supremacy.” He added, “These sinister ideologies must be defeated. Hate has no place in America, hatred warps the mind, ravages the heart and devours the soul. These barbaric slaughters are an assault on our communities, an attack on our nation and a crime against all humanity. We are sickened by this monstrous evil, the cruelty, the hatred, the malice, the bloodshed, and the terror.”  President Trump said: “Mental illness and hatred pull the trigger, not the gun.” The president also pointed to the “dark recesses of the Internet” and “gruesome and grisly” video games that help twist impressionable minds.  Democratic candidates for president responded by accusing Trump of being responsible for the killings.

    One of the most obvious creations of paranoia to overcome opposition was by Nicolas Maduro dictator of Venezuela who accused the United States of planning to assassinate his opponent.  That way Maduro can assassinate him and blame it on America.

    The Southern Poverty Law Center maintains a list of hate groups.  If they disagree with a group which they often do since they are a far left organization, they label it a hate group.  Pamela Geller wrote about the SPLC here and talks about it in the video below.

    Murders with guns are used to discredit the gun lobby even though murders have been prevented by people with guns.  If a racist commits a murder that is sometimes is blamed on the Republican party by Democrats.

   Angie Harmon was accused of racism because she was critical of Obama.  She complained that:

"If I have anything to say against Obama it's not because I'm a racist, it's because I don't like what he's doing as President and anybody should be able to feel that way, but what I find now is that if you say anything against him you're called a racist."

Portsmouth Democrat State Senator Louise Lucas accused Mitt Romney of engaging in racial tactics against Barack Obama.  She argued that:

What I am saying to you is Mitt Romney, hes speaking to a segment of the population, who does not like to see people other than a White man in a White House or any other elected position.

All the folks who are saying We dont like Barack Obama they cant tell you any reason they dont because President Obama did not create the situation they have, this economic mess we are in, everybody knows this stuff happened under George Bush and they are trying to dump it on the President.

And intelligent people understand that President Barack Obama did not create this mess. And the mess that was created could not be solved in 2 or 3 or 4 years.

    According to Lucas everyone knows the economic mess is all George Bush's fault so if they blame Obama it's because they are anti-black.  Never mind that the debt went up more under Obama than all his predecessors combined.  Never mind that when George Bush wanted to regulate Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac he was blocked by the Democrats.

The accusation of racism is made in order to discredit those who speak out against Obama and to prevent others from speaking out against him.

    There was a massive demonstration against Obama in Washington D.C..  Former president Jimmy Carter accused people who oppose Obama as being violent racists.  The following You Tube video discusses the accusation of racism against those who protested against Obama.

   Walter Williams in an article titled Is Disagreement with Obama Racism wrote in regard to the people who accuse opponents of Obama as racists:

For these people, it is inconceivable that many Americans are outraged by the presidents spending policies, budget deficits, industry takeovers, not to mention the appointment of Czars...  Obamas presidency is truly a remarkable commentary on the goodness of Americans and how far weve come in resolving matters of race. Obama convincingly won votes in states with insignificant black populations, such as the New England states, Iowa and Minnesota...

When one says that race is no longer the problem it once was, it is not the same as saying that there are not major problems that confront a large segment of the black population. Grossly fraudulent education is a major problem but it has nothing to do with racial discrimination as evidenced by the fact that the worse education received is in the very cities where blacks dominate the political structure. Crime is a major problem but it has nothing to do with racial discrimination, particularly in light of the fact that blacks commit most of the violent crime in America and well over 90 percent of their victims are black. The fact of a 70 percent illegitimacy rate and only 35 percent of black children raised in two-parent homes is a major problem but it has nothing to do with racial discrimination.

   Ken Blackwell in an article titled What Me Racist?  wrote:

Well, two former Presidents-Jimmy Carter and now Bill Clinton-have labeled me such. Why? Because I oppose President Obama's takeover of our health care system. We're celebrating 200 years this December of the great Samuel Johnson who said "patriotism is the last refuge of scoundrels." Today, Dr. Johnson might say charging racism is the first refuge of liberals.

Pat Lehman, the "dean of the Kansas delegation" to the Democratic National Convention and the president of the Kansas Democratic Labor Committee, invoked Adolf Hitler to argue that Republicans are lying when they say voter ID efforts are designed to combat voter fraud.

Its like Hitler said, if youre going to tell a lie, tell a big lie, and if you tell it often enough and say it in a loud enough voice, some people are going to believe you, Lehman said in an interview with The Wichita Eagle.

Wanting people to prove their identity when they vote is a totally reasonable way to prevent voter fraud.  The fact that many Democrats oppose ID checking indicates that they believe voter fraud will get them the white house.  The person telling the big lie is Pat Lehman.

Lehman also said Republicans, especially vice presidential nominee Paul Ryan, are on track to dismantle Medicare and Medicaid and every other social program, including education.

She stated that education is the only route most Americans can use to improve their lives, and the thought of having our public education system basically devastated, Im really worried about that.   Why isn't she worried about how the mounting debt threatens to destroy the value of the American dollar and make it impossible to pay for a decent education?  What about the people in the future who have to pay off the education of today's children.  Why not worry about how poor the quality of education is of Americans compared to that of students from other countries when America spends so much more on education than other countries?

Another democrat, John Burton echoed Lehman and said that Republicans are lying in order to defeat President Barack Obama.

"They lie and they don't care if people think they lie... Joseph Goebbels - it's the big lie, you keep repeating it," he told CBS News.

At the Democratic National Convention in Charlotte, N.C., a Jewish Democratic county chairman lashed out at evangelical Christians (who are mostly republican) , claiming they arent true friends of Jews and that Christians want Jews slaughtered to bring about the second coming of Jesus Christ.

      After Trump was elected I saw young people pouring along broadway toward the Trump tower in protest.  I saw an anti-bigot sign.  Since then I've seen a sign that said "love trumps hate" and "hate isn't great".  The last sign is a play on Trump's slogan "Make America Great Again".  These protestors believe that the Trump election is that of a racist bigot to office and a triumph for hate.  Trump appointed Steve Bannon the chairman of Breitbart news media as a chief strategist for his presidency.  There was outcry from the left that Steve Bannon was a racist anti-semite.  Even the head of the Anti-defamation league, defamed and accused Steve Bannon of anti-semitism.  You could probably not find someone more pro-Israel and more against anti-semitism than Steve Bannon except for maybe Donald Trump who the left also accuses of anti-semitism.   Benjamin Netanyahu, the prime minister of Israel said that Trump was the best friend Israel ever had.  Tommy Robinson an activist in England against Islamic extremism has been accused of anti-semitism when he is fighting against anti-semitic Islamic extremists.  There is a video of Tommy below wearing an Israeli Defense Forces shirt.

 The left also accused Steve Bannon of racism.  Steve Bannon worked hard to help inner city children and one of those who knows him well wrote that Steve doesn't have a "racist or sexist or homophobic bone in his body".  Despite all the evidence Bannon's accusers stick to their allegations because that is a way to get at Trump.  Accusations of hate, racism, sexism, homophobia and bigotry are all weapons the left uses to overcome those opposed to their views.

    In addition people and the media reported hate crimes that didn't happen and blamed them on Trump.

 What is interesting is that there was little if any complaints from the left about Jeremiah Wright's anti-semitism or Bill Ayer's terrorism because they were both associated with Obama.

The chairman of the South Carolina Democratic Party Dick Harpootian compared the Republicans female governor of South Carolina, Nikki Haley, to Adolf Hitlers mistress, Eva Braun.  The Mitt Romney campaign issued a statement afterwards 9/5/2012 demanding Democratic officials "cease and desist from comparing those with whom they disagree to Nazis" after three analogies were made over the course of three days by the partys politicians

   Michelle Malkin on Feb 23, 2010 wrote:

Last Thursday, a disturbed pilot flew a small plane into an Austin, Texas, office complex that contained an Internal Revenue Service office. ..

before taking off on his deadly journey. Investigators found a Web posting, identified as Stacks suicide manifesto, in which he railed against tax laws, inequity, government and crony capitalism. He also targeted puppet George W. Bush, murderous health care insurers and the pharmaceutical industry.

The manifesto ended:

The communist creed: From each according to his ability, to each according to his need.

The capitalist creed: From each according to his gullibility, to each according to his greed.

At the eponymous mega-website of Arianna Huffington, a 2,000-plus comment thread was filled with allusions to teabaggers:

I would bet he has a membership card to teabag nation and the Glenn Beck fan club!

Tea bag bomb.

Good to see natural selection still works! Tea party Unite!

This guy sounds just like a teabagger.

Oh please. This has tea bags dripping all over it.

I hope teabaggers are proud!!

Great opening day for CPAC (the Conservative Political Action Conference) isnt it??

This guy sounds like a Tea Partier first class! Maybe that movement is more DANGEROUS to our freedoms than they let on! Be afraid America, BE VERY AFRAID!

He was a Tea Party Terrorist.

     Tea Partiers are against government health insurance not private health insurance.  They are more likely to be pro-George Bush and more pro-capitalist than their leftist opponents.  There is no evidence that Mr. Stack was part of the Tea Party protest movement.  Yet the Left in its eagerness to smear their opponents saw this as an opportunity to paint Tea Partiers as terrorists. 

Michelle Malkin wrote:

The smear merchants, of course, are simply following Rahm Emanuels advice to exploit every crisis. Pointing fingers at the Tea Party gremlin demonizes the lefts most potent political opponents. This is the blame-gamers ultimate agenda: criminalizing dissent.

Rush Limbaugh wrote that:

David Checketts, an investor and owner of sports teams, approached me in late May about investing in the St. Louis Rams football franchise...  Numerous sportswriters, CNN, MSNBC, among others, falsely attributed to me statements I had never made...  I never said I supported slavery and I never praised James Earl Ray. How sick would that be?..

Having brought me into his group, Mr. Checketts now wanted a way out. He asked me to resign. I told him no way. I had done nothing wrong. I had not uttered the words these people were putting in my mouth. And I would not bow to their libels and pressure. He would have to drop me from the group. A few days later, he did.

As I explained on my radio show, this spectacle is bigger than I am on several levels. There is a contempt in the news business, including the sportswriter community, for conservatives that reflects the blind hatred espoused by Messrs. Sharpton and Jackson. "Racism" is too often their sledgehammer. And it is being used to try to keep citizens who don't share the left's agenda from participating in the full array of opportunities this nation otherwise affords each of us. It was on display many years ago in an effort to smear Clarence Thomas with racist stereotypes and keep him off the Supreme Court. More recently, it was employed against patriotic citizens who attended town-hall meetings and tea-party protests.

These intimidation tactics are working and spreading, and they are a cancer on our society.
 

Paranoia is created to those who dont believe that global warming is a result of human activity yet "Carbon dioxide is 0.000383 of our atmosphere by volume (0.038 percent), and Only 2.75 percent of that is a result of human activity. Man is responsible for just 0.001 percent of this atmosphere. If the atmosphere was a 100-story building, mans CO2 contribution today would be equivalent to the linoleum on the first floor."

The issue of Global Warming being caused by carbon dioxide production by industry has been discredited by a documentary titled The Great Global Warming Swindle. A much more convincing argument was that global warming is caused by changes in the solar wind which changes the amount of cloud formation. That suggests a way to cause global cooling (seed clouds). It is probable that behind the global warming hysteria are people with agendas such as anti-corporate agendas. Corporations are the big producers of carbon dioxide. The Republican party is generally seen as the pro-corporate party so it is in the interest of the Democrats to turn people against the Republicans by creating global warming hysteria. Scientists who do not agree with global warming are afraid to speak up. In the Global Warming Swindle a scientist said that its

Harder to get research proposals funded because of the stands we have taken publicly.

Another reason to support the global warming hysteria is it generates fame. Another scientist said in the Global Warming Swindle that:

Even within the scientific community, you see its a problem. If I run a complicated model, and I do something to it, like melt a lot of ice into the ocean, uh, and nothing happens, its not likely to get printed. But if I run the same model, and I adjust it in such a way that something dramatic happens to the ocean circulation, like the heat transport turns off, ah! It will be published. People will say that this is very exciting; it will even get picked up by the media. So there is a bias, theres a very powerful bias within the media and within the science community itself toward results which are, uh, dramatizable."

Jeff Jacoby wrote an article about the paranoid hysterical reaction to those who are skeptical about the global warming models. He wrote: (The Boston Globe 8/15/07)

At the Live Earth concert in New Jersey last month, Robert F. Kennedy Jr. denounced climate-change skeptics as "corporate toadies" for "villainous" enemies of America and the human race. "This is treason," he shouted, "and we need to start treating them now as traitors."

Some environmentalists and commentators have suggested that global-warming "denial" be made a crime, much as Holocaust denial is in some countries. Others have proposed that climate-change dissidents be prosecuted in Nuremberg-style trials. The Weather Channel's Heidi Cullen has suggested that television meteorologists be stripped of their American Meteorological Society certification if they dare to question predictions of catastrophic global warming.

A few weeks ago, the Competitive Enterprise Institute's Marlo Lewis published an article opposing mandatory limits on carbon-dioxide emissions, arguing that Congress should not impose caps until the technology exists to produce energy that doesn't depend on carbon dioxide. In response to Lewis's reasonable piece, the president of the American Council on Renewable Energy, Michael Eckhart, issued a threat:

"Take this warning from me, Marlo. It is my intention to destroy your career as a liar. If you produce one more editorial against climate change, I will launch a campaign against your professional integrity. I will call you a liar and charlatan to the Harvard community of which you and I are members. I will call you out as a man who has been bought by Corporate America."

Walter Williams wrote in Frontpage Magazine that:

U.N. Framework Convention on Climate Change Executive Secretary Yvo de Boer said it was criminally irresponsible to ignore the urgency of global warming. U.N. special climate envoy Dr. Gro Harlem Brundtland on May 10, 2007 declared the climate debate over and added its completely immoral, even, to question the U.N.s scientific consensus.

In July 23, 2007, CNNs Miles OBrien said, The scientific debate is over. Earlier he said that scientific skeptics of manmade catastrophic global warming are bought and paid for by the fossil fuel industry, usually...

The fact of the matter is an increasing amount of climate research suggests a possibility of global cooling. Geologist Dr. Don J. Easterbrook, Emeritus Professor at Western Washington University says, Recent solar changes suggest that it could be fairly severe, perhaps more like the 1880 to 1915 cool cycle than the more moderate 1945-1977 cool cycle. A more drastic cooling, similar to that during the Dalton and Maunder minimums, could plunge the Earth into another Little Ice Age, but only time will tell if that is likely.

Geologist Dr. David Gee, chairman of the science committee of the 2008 International Geological Congress, currently at Uppsala University in Sweden asks, For how many years must the planet cool before we begin to understand that the planet is not warming? For how many years must cooling go on?

  One of the most successful creation of paranoia campaigns was carried out against the Serbs.  Julia Gorin wrote an article about this in frontpagemagazine (3/16/05)  titled A Jewish Albatross: The Serbs.   The Muslims convinced the world that the Serbs were committing genocide against them.  Julia Gorin wrote:

We were told that a genocide was in progress. We were told of mass graves. A hundred thousand killed and 800,000 displaced, Bill Clinton said.

Soon after the U.S.-led NATO invasion, the 100,000 figure turned out to be closer to 2,000 and included armed Albanian and Serb fighters. No Bodies at Rumored Grave Site in Kosovo, read a Reuters headline as early as October 99, above an article reporting the results of an excavation by international war crimes investigators to check the rumors that Serbs had hidden up to 700 Albanian bodies in a lead and zinc mine. Other mass graves turned up empty or hardly massive, and the Racak massacre, the feather that was used to break the NATO camels back, turned out to have been staged, according to three forensics teams sent in to investigate--but only after the first team, headed by Finlands Helena Ranta, initially gave a thumbs-up to massacre so that the bombing campaign could commence. (Two years and thousands of lives later, Rantas final report confirmed the opposite conclusion.) ..If, as we were told, there was systematic rape by Serbs, where are the resulting children? Or evidence of mass abortions? Jewish women had Nazi babies, and at Nuremberg there was plenty of testimony and plenty of evidence. So far at the Hague, there has been only testimony (much of which falls apart under cross-examination), and virtually no evidence.

If, as we were told, there was systematic rape by Serbs, where are the resulting children? Or evidence of mass abortions? Jewish women had Nazi babies, and at Nuremberg there was plenty of testimony and plenty of evidence. So far at the Hague, there has been only testimony (much of which falls apart under cross-examination), and virtually no evidence.

    As a result of the successful Muslim propaganda campaign the West bombed the Serbs for 78 days.  The Muslims are now in power in Kosovo and are committing atrocities against the Serbs. 

    Another very successful creation of paranoia campaign is carried out by Muslims against Israel. One way they do this is by shooting rockets at Israeli from civilian areas. When the Israelis strike back civilians get killed which enrages the Muslim world and turns the West against Israel.

According to the German scholar Matthias Kntzel, the Berlin daily the Tagesspiegel published a letter-to-the-editor from Dr. Mounir Herzallah, a Shiite from the South of Lebanon. Dr. Herzallah reports on how Hezbollah-terrorists came to his town, dug a munitions depot and then built a school and a residence directly over it. He writes: Laughing, a local sheikh explained to me that the Jews lose either way: either because the rockets are fired at them or because, if they attack munitions depot, they are condemned by world public opinion on account of the dead civilians. Hezbollah, he says, uses the civilian population as a human shield and then when they are dead as propaganda. (Stage Managed Massacre, by Robert Spencer, Frontpagemag.com 8/2/2006)

A link to pictures of the use of civilians as human shields by Hezbollah is included with an editorial in the Washington Times (July 31, 200)6. Haaretz, quotes an Israeli paratrooper who sums up Hezbollah's tactics: "They are a lousy army. They only win when they hide behind baby carriages."

Arabs create phony photos of Israeli atrocities which are distributed by Western media. This practice has been dubbed "fauxtography."

WND columnist Michelle Malkin surveyed wrote:

It's the story that the journalistic elite would rather just go away. In the aftermath of Reuters' admission that one of its photographers, Adnan Hajj, had manipulated two war images from Lebanon after bloggers smoked out his crude Photoshop alterations, and all 920 of his Reuters photos were pulled, evidence of far more troubling photo staging and media deception in the Middle East continues to pour in.

After citing other galling examples, Malkin noted: "Not all photographers overseas have their heads in the sand. Last week, Middle East-based photographer Bryan Denton, whose work has appeared in the New York Times, revealed on the professional photography website Light Stalkers that he had observed routine staging of photos and even corpse-digging by Lebanese stringers. (WND.com 1/3/2007)

Francisco Gil White writes that the Intifada was a (Is the U.S. an Ally of Israel, Part 2)

deliberate strategy of the PLO meant to produce the appearance of Israeli oppression

The Egyptians created a staged movie of Israelis soldiers killing bound Egyptian prisoners. This has been aired by the Palestinian Authority in addition to the Egyptians in order to create paranoia and hatred toward Israel.

When a landmine blew up children on a Gaza beach Hamas accused Israel of killing the children. That this is not the case is supported by the fact that shrapnel removed from a girl who survived the blast was not from Israeli artillery. Other evidence was presented by Palestinian Media Watch which I include below:

PA TV falsifies video of Gaza deaths By Itamar Marcus and Barbara Crook, June 12, 2006

Palestinian Authority TV has been repeatedly broadcasting a falsified video clip of the events surrounding the deaths of seven family members on the Gaza beach on Friday. In an attempt to blame Israel's navy for the deaths, PA TV took unrelated video of an Israeli missile boat firing at Gaza earlier in the day and edited them into the scenes, creating the impression Israeli responsibility.

The following is the time frame of the PA TV editing and falsification:
00 - :32 Seconds: PATV clip introduces the scene by showing an Israeli missile boat firing on the Gaza coast. Audio of ambulance siren is added to visual to create false impression that boat was shooting at same time as ambulances were present.
0:32 - 1:05: Scene switches directly to the victims, creating a false connection between the events.
1:05 1:09: PA TV returns to the naval vessel showing sailor with binoculars looking at shore, again creating the false impression he is observing the evacuation.
1:09 2:00: The evacuation scene continues ending with the word "Why" on the screen only in English, indicating a foreign target audience, possibly media.

The video of the Israeli navy was unrelated to the deaths, having been filmed earlier in the day and had already released to the media and to the internet by the Israeli army at 4:00 PM, an hour prior to the deaths.

Click here to see the falsified PA TV broadcast of the evacuation

Comment: It should be noted that not only is the video falsified, but the beach scene clearly backs the Israeli contention that the deaths were not caused by an Israeli shell. Any Israeli shell would have left a giant crater and spread sand over the entire area, as well as on the victims. There is no crater and the beach scene is not disturbed in a way that indicates an Israeli shell could have landed nearby.

Forging evidence in this way fits the category of creating paranoia in order to shift blame. However, there is evidence that Palestinian Arabs have been killed by other Palestinians deliberately simply to create paranoia to Israel. (Leyden, J., Hamas Murders Children in Palestine, Frontpagemag.com 6/13/2006)

One tactic used to create paranoia by anti-American Muslims is to take photos of dead people and claim the U.S. did it. Middle East news website Al Jazeera published a provocative photo (wnd.com 6/15/06)purporting to show a "massacre" by Marines in Haditha, Iraq, despite the fact several papers already issued retractions admitting the image was of fishermen executed by terrorists months before the incident under investigation.

    Egypt has always been a factory of anti-Israel paranoia and it's production of this paranoia has increased since the fall of Mubarak.  Eldad Beck wrote that:

The best way to eliminate someone politically is to accuse him of having ties with Israel. Egyptians are eagerly reading reports about Israel's "secret takeover" during Mubarak's era; most of the stories are pure inventions meant to implicate former top officials in the gravest crime of all: Normalization with Israel.

Meanwhile, businessmen associated with the previous regime are accused of planning to sell Cairo's main streets to the Jewish Agency, "which is planning to take over Cairo as it took over Palestine." If this hysterical witch-hunt, which is replete with anti-Semitic tones, wasn't enough, Egyptian daily al-Wafd reported this week that Israel also stole the opera Aida from Egypt.

"Israel, as usual, is exploiting events in Arab states in its favoras it considers itself a Middle Eastern state, it organized several Aida shows at the Dead Sea on June 5th and 6th. It appears Israel chose those dates in order to celebrate our defeat in the 1967 war. Aida was written especially for Egypt, yet Israel is always trying to take over the property of others."

   Much of the outrage against Mubarak's regime stemmed from him not being anti-Israel enough.   Despite this Dubai's police commander said Egypt's trial of former President Hosni Mubarak was an 'Israeli plot.'  Whether he really believes this or is trying to protect Mubarak is hard to know.

   Inez Laufer explained how supporters of Female Genital Mutilation create paranoia to those who oppose them:

To the relativists - who kept their eyes closed to the fact that the anti-FGM movement started in Africa, not in the Western world - this was an infamous affront to what they see as a significant part of African culture and identity. They called the Western opponents of FGM cultural imperialists and racists - and simply ignored the voices of the growing number of men and women who opposed this butchery in their own African, Arabian or Asian countries.

    The opposition to the ruling United Democratic Front of Malawi spread rumors that the country's government is colluding with vampires to collect human blood for international aid agencies (Reuters 1/10/03).  As a result hundreds of angry Malawians accusing Governor Eric Chiwaya of harboring vampires and stoned him.

  Lest we think we Americans are too civilized to spread false rumors to overcome opposition, the Democrats put out an internal manual that advises Democrats to launch "pre-emptive" strikes charging the GOP with voter intimidation - even if none exists.  The manual reads:

If no signs of intimidation techniques have emerged yet, launch a 'pre-emptive strike'

The manual goes on to provide ways in which Kerry workers can spotlight intimidation, including organizing ministers or other civic leaders to protest it, writing press releases etc.. 

Tad Devine, a top Kerry aide, defended the manual on CNN saying "We're going to make sure people of color are not turned away from voting places" (New York Post 10/15/04).  This is clearly a way of trying to mobilize the black vote.  I never before heard the charge that people of color were turned away from voting places, something like that would have made headlines in all the newspapers in the United States, and would have resulted in a major law suit, therefore I suspect the charge is a fabrication in order to mobilize blacks.

  Before the re-election of John Street as mayor of Philadelphia, in 2003 or 2004, an eavesdropping search was found in his office.   The FBI had planted it because of a corruption investigation.  Mayor Street's campaign used the charge that the FBI was out to get him the way they went after Dr. Martin Luther King, to mobilize the black vote and succeeded in relecting him in a landslide. 

  There is overwhelming evidence that the American left, in an effort to defeat George Bush forged accusations against his National Guard Service (New York Post 9/10/04). 

   Ms. Burkett, mentioned at a Frontpage symposium (The Left's Hatred of Bush, 11/15/04) the creation of paranoia by the left toward Bush and suggested that one motive might have been to overcome him and reelect Kerry.  She said:

I certainly don't agree with Bush on many things. However, the demonizing of Bush and his administration, with its attendant refusal to acknowledge that he has, in some cases, struck blows for justice, suggests to me either that the Left doesn't care much about justice and freedom or that it is more interested in promoting John Kerry than in those principles.

As one who grew up on the Left, that death of principle makes me extremely sad.

  Although after 9/11 the majority of Democrats voted for the Patriot act, in order to win the election against Bush they blamed it on him and created paranoia that it was a major threat to civil liberties.  Jonah Goldberg wrote:  (townhall.com, Exit Ashcroft, Abused, Maligned and Right After All, 11/12/04)

Because it was an election year, the leadership of the Democratic Party found wisdom in feeding the worst paranoia about the Patriot Act without ever seeming to care that they were undermining a vital law designed to prevent another 9/11. An entire phantasmagoria of tyrannies, oppressions and injustices were alleged to have been spawned out of the hateful Patriot Act - most particularly the dreaded Section 215, which allowed the government to search library records. So intense was the propaganda campaign about this bat-winged clause that Sen. Russell Feingold could say with a straight face that Americans had become "afraid to read books, terrified into silence." Librarians burned their card catalogs lest The Man find out who borrowed "Huck Finn."

Of course, not one library was ever searched. Ever.

Dennis Prager wrote that:

Leftist rhetoric routinely depicts opponents of the Left in extreme terms. Opponents of race-based affirmative action are racists. Opponents of same-sex marriage are homophobes. Opponents of illegal immigration are xenophobes, racists and engaged in Nazism (that is the word that Cardinal Roger Mahony used to describe Arizonas anti-illegal immigration law). And so on.

  On September 19, 02, Iraqi Foreign Minister Naji Sabri in an effort to gain support against the United States at the U.N. read a paranoia-creating message from Saddam Hussein to the U.N. General Assembly as follows:

In targeting Iraq the United States is acting on behalf of Zionism, which has been killing the heroic people of Palestine and seeking to impose their domination on the whole world, not only militarily but also economically and politically...

The U.S. administration wants to destroy Iraq in order to control the Middle East oil and, consequently, control the politics, as well as the oil and economic polices of the whole world.

  The speech elicited applause from the U.N. chamber.  Yet it was Iraq who invaded Kuwait in order to control Middle East oil.  It was the U.S. who drove him out and left an independent Kuwait. The Iraqi speech also makes use of the Arab hatred of Zionism and ties the United States to Zionism thus creating more paranoia against the United States. 

   The Democrats in their opposition to Bush also created paranoia against him for the invasion of Iraq.  Rachel Ehrenfeld wrote in Frontpagemag.com (Iran's Growing Threat 7/23/04) that the politicians of the Democratic party have said that each American and Iraq death the intended are the  by-product of President Bush's willful lies.  She wrote:

Ted Kennedy  claimed the war was "cooked up in Texas" months or years before it was  launched; Al Gore screeches that President Bush "betrayed us!"; and the Left  at large has claimed the president massaged intelligence to manipulate the  public into attacking the benign despot of Iraq.

   Jock O'Connell in his Review of Louis Rappoport's book Stalin's War Against the Jews wrote how:

On January 13, 1952, the Soviet government announced that nine Kremlin doctors, six with identifiably Jewish names, were involved in a plot conceived by Western intelligence agencies and Zionists to kill the top Soviet political and military leadership. Over the next forty days, the Soviet media whipped an already hysterical anti- Semitism into a mass psychosis. Amid this climate of hate, the government circulated a letter for the signature of prominent Soviet Jews. This so-called "Jewish Statement" appealed to the authorities to evacuate all Jews -- for their own safety -- to camps in remote regions of the country.

The Doctor's Plot was to be Stalin's pretext for the Final Pogrom... (Stalin's death in March 1953) ... abruptly concluded this meticulously organized campaign against Soviet Jewry. Within days, most of those arrested were released, and the Kremlin issued a statement that the plot had been a complete fabrication. In "Stalin's War Against the Jews," Jerusalem Post editor Louis Rapoport has produced an extraordinarily chilling tale of an era of civic terror most Americans literally could even imagine. (Khrushchev described life under Stalin as "The Lottery.")

   Before the U.S. elections in 2004, the North Koreans created paranoia against Bush because they didn't want him reelected.   According to frontpagemag.com (9/23/04)

The North Koreans already know that President Bush is going to maintain a hard line with them: he will demand nuclear disarmament, transparency in processes, cessation of sale of missile parts to rogue states, cessation of trafficking in narcotics and it is hoped immediate improvement in the human rights situation in North Korea. Conversely, North Korea expects that a John Kerry presidency would be in essence a return to the Clinton policies of live and let live. North Korea would expect bilateral talks that provide the opportunity for them to play one side off against the other and to negotiate very favorable deals. They expect that a threat of hostile action will convince Kerry to placate and appease rather than challenge and demand.

For these reasons the North Korean regime has openly supported the Kerry candidacy and runs pro-Kerry messages within North Korea and on its web sites. Bush, conversely, is portrayed as a monster and warmonger who oppresses their fellow Koreans in the South. In a recent BBC production entitled "Access to Evil," the news crew interviewed North Korean students whom when asked if they had a message for President Bush replied "stop killing the children of South Korea."

  The Creation of the fictitious Protocol of the Elders of Zion is a classic example of paranoia creation to discredit an opponent.  The charter of the fundamentalist Palestinian group, Hamas, cites The Protocols of the Elders of Zion by name and frequently reflects the message of that fraudulent text:

The enemies (The Jews) . . . have labored to amass astounding and influential material wealth, which has been exploited to realize their dream. They have used their wealth to gain control of the world media, news agencies, the press, broadcasting stations, etc. . . . They were behind the French revolution and the Communist revolution. . . . They instigated World War I. . . . They caused World War II. . . . It was they who gave the instructions to establish the United Nations and the Security Council to replace the League of Nations, in order to rule over the world through them.

   The Protocols purports to be the secret transcription of a Zionist Congress that met in Switzerland in 1897 as taken down by a tsarist spy and first published in St. Petersburg in 1903.  At the meeting Jewish leaders allegedly discussed their plans to establish Jewish "sovereignty over all the world."   The Protocols includes their boasts of being invincible and plans to establish a "Super-Government Administration" that will "subdue all the nations."  

Robert Carroll in the Skeptic's dictionary explains that The Protocols of the Elders of Zion is a forgery made in Russia for the Okhrana (secret police), which blames the Jews for the country's ills. It was first privately printed in 1897 and was made public in 1905. It is copied from a nineteenth century novel (Biarritz, 1868) and claims that a secret Jewish cabal is plotting to take over the world.

  The basic story was composed by a  German novelist and anti-Semite named Hermann Goedsche who used the pseudonym of Sir John Retcliffe. Goedsche stole the main story from another writer, Maurice Joly, whose "Dialogues in Hell Between Machiavelli and Montesquieu" (1864) involved a Hellish plot aimed at opposing Napoleon III. Goedsche's original contribution consists mainly of introducing Jews to do the plotting to take over the world.

  The Russians used big chunks of a Russian translation of Goedsche's novel, published it separately as the Protocols, and claimed they were authentic. Their purpose was political: to strengthen the czar Nicholas II's position by exposing his opponents as allies with those who were part of a massive conspiracy to take over the world.

  The Protocols were exposed as a forgery in 1921 by Philip Grave, a correspondent for the London Times; by  Herman Bernstein in The Truth About "The Protocols of Zion": A Complete Exposure, reprinted with introduction by Norman Cohn (Ktav Publishing House, New York,1971); and Lucien Wolf in The Jewish Bogey and the Forged Protocols of the Learned Elders of Zion (London : Press Committee of the Jewish Board of Deputies,1920).

  After the Russian Revolution in 1917, frustrated supporters of the ousted Czar rescued the document from obscurity in order to discredit the Bolsheviks.

   Hitler endorsed the book and made it a key argument in justifying his murder of 6 million Jews.  In the words of historian Norman Cohn, the Protocols served as the Nazis' "warrant for genocide."

   Israel's Channel 7 reported on 12/7/01 about Arab use of the protocols which I quote below:

The Middle East Media Research Institute (MEMRI) reports that several Arab television stations, including those in Egypt, are broadcasting a special series on the "evidence" of a Jewish conspiracy to rule the world, as described in the above Czarist anti-Semitic tract. While "Protocols" is still widely sold in the Arab world, this is the first television series on the subject purporting to show how the Jews and Israel act today to enact the strategy described in the work. The 30-part series, entitled "Horseman Without a Horse," is a huge undertaking starring over 400 Arab actors, including prominent ones, from Egypt, Syria and France. MEMRI reports that the series was produced by Arab Radio and Television, which broadcasts to the Middle East, North America, Latin America, Australia and Africa.

   An Egyptian weekly, Ruz al-Yusuf, lauded the series for "courageously tackl[ing] the 24 Protocols of the Elders of Zion, revealing them and clarifying that they are the central line that still, to this very day, dominates Israel's policy, political aspirations, and racism..." The book contain 24 aspects of an alleged Jewish plot to take over the world, and the TV series states that "19 of the 24 protocols [have already] been put into practice" - and then proceeds to give examples. For instance, the presidency of Bill Clinton is alleged to be the application of a Jewish plot to "choose someone corrupt [for the presidency of the superpower] and when he resists us - we will expose him." Other alleged Jewish "protocols" such as 'Feed a dog, [but] not a Muslim or a Christian' and 'Kill a Muslim or a Christian and take his house as your house and his lands as your lands' are also highlighted.

  According to the Simon Wiesenthal Center, Muhammad Sobhi, a co-writer and actor or The Horseman without a Horse said:

    Zionism exists and it has controlled the world since the dawn of history.

  Daniel Pipes (New York Post 11/4/02) wrote how:

For some weeks now, the Arab Voice (an Arabic language newspaper published weekly in Paterson New Jersey) has been serializing an Arabic-language version of "The Protocols of the Elders of Zion" in its pages....That a forgery that helped caused the Holocaust is now openly published in New Jersey points to two important realities:

1.      Arab and Muslim institutional life in the Untied States remains as radicalized after 9/11 as it was before.

2.      Arab and Muslim institutions are now the primary advocates of anti-Semitism worldwide, including in the West.

    Syria published an updated version of the Protocols in which they included allegations that the Jews burn out the eyes of Palestinians with red-hot iron pokers and that they open up their stomachs, remove their kidneys, liver and heart and then sew them up again. (wnd.com 3/9/05)

   Ibrahim Nafi, the editor of Al Ahram, the Egyptian government controlled newspaper, has claimed that the food the U.S. is dropping in Afghanistan is genetically poisoned.

  Al Jazeera, the popular Qatari satellite channel transmitted pictures of Afghan toddlers with charred limbs and crushed skulls -- the results, it says, of the latest American bombing raid.  Again an effort to stir up the Muslim masses.

  Abu Bakar Bashir, leader of Jemaah Islamiyah whose organization is probably behind the car bombing of the Sari nightclub in Bali which killed 188 people and wounded hundreds of others, accused the United States of carrying out the bombing saying, (New York Post 10/14/02)

It would be impossible for Indonesians to do it. Indonesians don't have such powerful explosives. I think maybe the U.S. is behind the bombings because they always say Indonesia is part of the terrorist network.

   In a Newsweek interview he was asked if it was possible that some other Indonesian Islamic group carried out the bombing.  He replied:

Definitely not, it was carried out by America.  They probably hired some people who claim to be Muslims or are amateur Muslims.  That's a possibility but I'm sure that America and Israel were the masterminds.

When asked about the perception that he is the new Osama bin Laden he replied:

Praise the Lord. Osama bin Laden is a Muslim hero and warrior of God. Not a terrorist. The real terrorists are [U.S. President] George Bush and [Israeli Prime Minister] Ariel Sharon. Osama bin Laden was acting in self-defense. He was defending Islam. He saw Islam being attacked, so he fought back. Thats what we call a mujahedin, not a terrorist. America attacked Afghanistan first, without any reason. Israel kills Palestinians for no reason.

The pattern of committing an atrocity and then blaming it on the United States and/or Israel has been used before by Muslim groups, notably in the accusation that the U.S. and Israel was behind the attacks of 9/11/2000.

   Saudi Sunnis blame Jews for the existence of the Shiite branch of Islam.   When Sheikh Abel Aziz bin Baz was Saudi Arabia's highest ranked Sunni theologian he was asked why Sunnis don't like Shi'ites.  He answered:

When the Shi'ites say that reason must be favored over tradition what they mean is putting man in place of God.  For us Islam is a truth from the beginning to the eternity.  It cannot be something today and something else tomorrow.

   The Saudi Sunnis in order to discredit the Shi'ites have written into some of their government financed books that Shi'ism was "invented by a Jew as a means of splitting Islam" and accuse Shi'ites of practicing incest and cannibalism in secret. (Amir Taheri, Apartheid, Saudi Style, New York Post 5/22/03)

   Muslim terrorists also blame India for their atrocities.  On March 24, 2003, Islamic militants dragged 24 Hindus from their homes and massacred them in a remote village in Indian Kashmir.  Women and children were among those shot by a group dressed as soldiers. (Times Online 3/25/03)

Hizbul Mujahidin, the main Kashmiri militant group, condemned it and accused India of orchestrating it.

  Farouq Qaddumi, head of the PLOs Political Department, was interviewed on December 12, 2001 by Londons al-Hayat newspaper. In that interview Qaddumi described the methods used to fight Israel.  He said:

It is a war based on the element of surprise, in time and place. In this war, one incites the public for 20 hours, and fights for perhaps two hours.

   Examples of incitement in the Palestinian media can be found at Palestinian Media Watch.  After a wave of suicide bombings Israeli soldiers engaged in hand to hand fighting in towns such as Jenin in order to rout out terrorists.  The Palestinians declared that the Israelis carried out a massacre in Jenin.  According to Israeli intelligence, the Palestinians in order to convince the international community that the Jews had massacred Palestinians, dug up graves and moved the remains from those graves to one large grave so as to produce a mass grave to show the international community.  In addition Palestinians held phony funerals in the Jenin refugee camp to make the death toll appear worse than it was.   An Israel Defense Force drone filmed a funeral procession on April 28, during which the stretcher-bearers dropped the purported corpse.  The "dead" man hopped back onto the stretcher, but the next time he was dropped, he walked away in a huff (The Jewish Week 5/20/02).  In reality the Israelis went to great efforts to avoid hurting the civilians of Jenin.  The Palestinians have been circulating a movie Jenin, Jenin at Palestinian film festivals on American college campuses in which they interview Palestinian Arabs who fabricate atrocity stories and make wild accusations of Israeli F16 attacks killing thousands of Arabs in Jenin.  An excellent article about this called "PLO Propaganda Film, Jenin Jenin" (frontpagemag 2/20/04)  can be viewed online.

Films of a 12-year-old Palestinian boy crouching behind his father in terror as Israelis gunned them down in Netzarim junction on Sept 30, 2000 were shown across the world.  A journalistic  study of the incident concluded that it was a piece of Palestinian street theater.    A report about this study titled "Mohammed al-Dura martyrdom a media myth?" is published in the March 2003, edition of Whistleblower. Phyllis Chesler in her book The New Antisemitism, wrote:

A German television documentary that aired in March 2002 strongly concluded that "it is not possible to determine with absolute certainty that Palestinans shot the boy, but the extensive evidence points, with high probability to the fact that the Israelis did not do it.  Israeli shooters were all stationed in low places, and the boy was shot from above.  (IsraelInsider, Mar 20, 2002)

Whistleblower cites reports of Palestinians playing to the camera, including Israeli commentator Amnon Lord's account of the larger scene at Netzarim Junction when al-Dura was supposedly shot to death. He describes "incongruous battle scenes complete with wounded combatants and screeching ambulances played out in front of an audience of laughing onlookers, while makeshift movie directors do retakes of botched scenes."

Palestinian journalist Sami El Soudi echoes Lord's observation, who discloses that

Almost all Palestinian directors take part more or less voluntarily in these war commissions, under the official pretext that we should use all possible means, including trickery and fabulation, to fight against the tanks and airplanes the enemy has and we dont. Our official press reported 300 wounded and dead at Netzarim junction the day when Mohammed was supposedly killed. Most of the cameramen there were Palestinians. They willingly took part in the masquerade, filming fictional scenes, believing they were doing it out of patriotism. When a scene was well done the onlookers laughed and applauded....

Tatiana Menaker in an article called "College Film Festival: Kill the Jews" wrote that (frontpagemagazine.com 12/16/03) :

Palestinian Arabs have become professional victims and actors in the "Israelis-and-Jews-Are-Horrible-Child-Murderers series. These films are constantly shown in Europe and especially in the Middle East due to heavy demand and plentiful funding.

   In another effort to create paranoia toward the Israelis the Palestinians fired on Israelis from the Church of the Nativity and when the Israelis fired back they lit three fires in the church and blamed it on Israel.  Arafat shaking with feigned fury said to reporters:  (New York Post 5/2/02)

I don't care if this room I'm sitting in blows up. It is not important what happened to me here.  What is important is what is happening in the Church of the Nativity. This is a crime that cannot be forgiven. How could the world possibly be silent about this atrocious crime?

   This is hypocritical to say the least as Palestinian gunmen took refuge in the Church of the Nativity, took the Christians inside hostage and fired on Israelis from there and according to Israeli intelligence refused to leave as a result of orders from Yasser Arafat.  According to the Jerusalem Post (4/28/02), monks who managed to flee the church have told security officials how the Palestinian gunmen were looting and destroying property inside the church and threatening the hostages.

   It is also hypocritical when one considers the history of the PLO's lack of respect for churches or for Christians for that matter.  In January 1976 Arafat's men destroyed Damour, a Christian town of 25,000 people in Lebanon. There were five churches and three chapels in Damour. Some 500 people gathered in the Church of St. Elias. They did not know how to escape the murderous assault. An old man suggested that they raise a white flag. "Perhaps if we surrender they may spare us." Pretty soon two men who fled the town earlier knocked at the door of the Church.  They saw the white flag from the shore and rushed to the church to tell the people that it would not help to raise a flag. "We raised a flag in front of Our Lady, and they shot at us."   The people decided to flee the town, except of one old man who said that he could not walk and would prefer to die in front of his own house. He was not killed. Several weeks later Father Mansour Labaky, the priest of Damour, found him in a PLO prison, and learned what happened after the people left the Church of St. Elias. Soon after they were gone "the PLO came and bombed the church without entering it. They kicked open the door and threw in the grenades. The people that left would all have been killed had they stayed" (Jillian Becker. The PLO. St. Martin's Press, New York, 1984).

   The fact that there still is a Palestinian refugee problem is the result of the desire of the Arabs to create paranoia to the Jews.  With all the oil money the Arabs had they could have easily resettled the Arab refugees who fled Israel when the United Arab world tried to destroy Israel in 1948.  Some of these camps are in Arafat controlled territory yet these refugees still live in squalid conditions despite generous aid from the World to Arafat.  Instead of improving their living conditions Arafat has kept the refugees in camps as a propaganda tool while he spent donated money on buying weapons.  Sharon aide Dani Naveh prepared a dossier based on the vast intelligence information garnered as a result of Operation Defensive Shield that revealed that huge amounts of cash sent by Europeans for Palestinian economic projects were funneled to the Tanzim, Arafat's Force 17 presidential guard, and other Palestinian Authority organizations that took part in terror (5/4/02). By diverting funding from the camps Arafat not only accomplished his goal of increased terrorism against Israel, he also accomplished his goal of keeping the level of hatred up against Israel since the poor conditions in the camps probably increases the hatred of the camp inhabitants towards Israel.  Hatred of Israel and the United States is fomented in these camps, children are taught in their textbooks to hate Israel.  30% of the funding of these camps comes from the United States according to the Special Report with Brit Hume TV program(April 30, 2002).

The Franciscan Custody of the Holy Land and the International Coalition for Nazareth, said that local residents told them that every night cars drive through the city with loudspeakers blaring anti-Christian and anti-Israel propaganda (Jerusalem Post online edition 1/21/02).

   As part of the roadmap agreement the Palestinian Authority agreed to stop incitement.  Indeed they did erase some incitement off some walls but on the same day that they were being praised by the International media for doing that Palestinian TV broadcast a high school graduation ceremony during which the graduates sang this song:

With words and with a rifle we will sing.  From Jerusalem to Gaza, Ramallah, Al Bira, Haifa, Jaffa, and Ramla.  There is no alternative even if they promise us the Garden of Eden.  The sound of the submachine gun is heard.  We will live and die only that our homeland should return to us.  I am a Palestinian.  My weapon is the stone and the knife.

   On July 13th, not long after the roadmap agreement Palestinian television broadcast a sermon of Hassan Khader in which he reminded his Muslim audience that (Worldnetdaily 7/15/03):

Muhammad said in his Hadith: "The Hour [Day of Resurrection] will not arrive until you fight the Jews, [until a Jew will hide behind a rock or tree] and the rock and the tree will say: 'Oh Muslim, servant of Allah, there is a Jew behind me, come and kill him!'

   The Palestinians produce music videos to indoctrinate children to become suicide bombers. 

   One way the Palestinians make propaganda against the Jewish settlers is to accuse them of cutting down their olive trees.  Left-wing activist Arik Asherman who is against the settlers investigated the charges.  He said that he knows of incidents in which Arabs cut down their own olive trees in Yesha (Judea, Samaria and Gaza) in order to later blame the Jewish residents and thus benefit from a "propaganda" victory.  The PA's agriculture department pays the damages for cut-down trees from money arriving from Saudi Arabia. (Israel National News 11/27/03)

    Moslems create paranoia to Steven Emerson, a reporter who investigated the network of Islamic terrorist groups in the United States in order to silence him.   Ali Abunimah, a leader of the Chicago-based Arab American Action Network convinced NPR to ban Emerson by accusing Mr. Emerson of being a "well-documented anti-Arab, anti-Muslim racist" and threatening them if they allowed him to speak on the air again.  Arabs actually went further than that and dispatched an assassination team to kill him.

   The cry of racism is often used by Moslems and their supporters in attacking their critics.  Daniel Pipes warned of the dangers of al-Qaida to the U.S. several months before Sept. 11, 2001. Yet his warning was reviled as racist by some, including Columbia University professor Edward Said, who scoffed at "highly exaggerated racial stereotyping" that talked of hijacking jetliners and blowing up buildings. (WorldnetDaily   Muslims Protest Possible Bush Appointment August 14, 2003)

   David Horowitz the organizer of Islamo-Fascism week on campuses discussed in an interview with Glen Beck described how the accusation of racism is used to silence opponents. He said:

The term Islamo fascism first doesn't mean all Muslims We were defending most Muslims. If you believe that there are moderate Muslims and I do we were defending them. We were defending Muslim women from being abused and yet we were called sexist. Because the terms are not used to describe anything real. What they are they're terms to shut you up. To paint a target on your back and make everyone hate you so they won't listen to you to begin with.

  Oriana Fallaci in her book The Rage and The Pride wrote:

"What logic is there in respecting those who do not respect us?  What dignity is there in defending their culture or supposed culture when they show contempt for ours?  I want to defend my culture, not theirs, and I inform you that I like Dante Alighieri and Shakespeare and Goethe and Verlaine and Walt Whitman and Leopardi much more than Omar Khayam."  Well: I got crucified.  "You racist, dirty racist!" It was our cicadas who crucified me with the fraudulent word "racist."And later, that is during the Soviet invasion of Afghanistan, they did it again.  They did it because each time the bearded warriors yelled Allah-akbar while shooting the mortar, I had a foreboding and said: "Let's admit it.   Soviets are what they are, but in this case we should thank them."   Besides, I got crucified also when I pointed out what they used to do to the Soviet prisoners.  I mean they cut off their arms and their legs.  (The same atrocity, don't forget they performed at the end of the nineteenth century on Queen Victoria's ambassadors and on other European diplomats based in Kabul.  After such mutilation, they decapitated the victim still alive, and with the cut head they played buskachi, a sort of Afghan polo.As for the arms and legs, they  sold them as trophies in the bazaar...).  I got crucified then, too, yes.  ...They called me "racist" for that too remember?

   Ironically it is the Palestinian Arabs who are the real racists.  An excellent article about this was written by Alan Dershowitz (The Palestinians Genocide Campaign, Jerusalem Post 4/14/04).  He wrote that the random targetting of civilians in Israel because they are Jewish by terrorists is racist.  He wrote that:

It should not be surprising that Palestinian terrorists employ racist criteria in selecting their civilian targets, since the entire goal of Palestinian terrorism is racist to its core. It seeks to deny the Jewish people the right to self-determination. Under their version of Islamic law, it is impermissible for Jews to govern any land that was once under Muslim control, and it is equally impermissible for a Jewish majority to govern a Muslim minority, namely Israeli Arabs.

   Paranoia is created by Moslems on American campuses.      200 pro-PLO activists convened a 2 day Israel divestment conference at the University of Michigan on Oct 12 and 13, 2002.  University of Michigan graduate and Detroit Attorney Debbie Schlussel, told Israel's Channel 7 (10/14/02) that some of the speakers at the PLO conference delivered hate-filled incitement-laced speeches against Israel and Jews.

   According to Schlussel one of the speakers at the PLO-conference was U of M student Fadi Kiblawi who published an article in a student newspaper the previous year calling on Arabs to strap on bombs and blow up Jewish students.  Schlussel added that university authority's had knowledge of Kiblawi's article but nevertheless allowed him to speak.

   Laurie Zoloth, a professor at San Francisco State University wrote, in a widely circulated email that: (New York Post 5/14/02)

I cannot fully express what it feels like to have to walk across campus daily, past posters of cans of soup with labels on them of drops of blood and dead babies, labeled 'canned Palestinian children meat, slaughtered according to Jewish rites.'

According to John Podhoretz

That's the explicit return of the "blood libel" the foul accusation leveled against the Jews of England in the 12th century that they were killing Gentile babies and using their blood in religious rituals.

   Moslem and Jew Haters in general, see some of Israel's support in the world as stemming from memory of the Holocaust.  For this reason there is a lot of Holocaust denial among Moslems.  Likewise sympathy for Israel increased after the Sept 11th attacks.  This was one reason many Islamic countries accused the Mossad of having carried them out.  Antisemitism has been on the rise in Europe with the results that Jews are attacked daily in countries such as France.  Some anti-semites perceive that the widespread attacks against Jews occuring in France by Moslems could gain the Jews sympathy.  For this reason the April 29 issue of The Tehran Times, cited a report published in the United Arab Emirates-based daily, Al-Khalij, referring to statements made by French anti-globalization activist Jose Bouvet.

According to Bouvet, the Mossad has been organizing daily attacks on synagogues in France "in order to divert French public attention from Israeli atrocities against Palestinians.

    Ion Mihai Pacepa, the former acting chief of Communist Romanias espionage service, whose book Red Horizons was republished in 24 countries told about how the Soviet Bloc added to the paranoia of the Arabs against the United States in a symposium hosted by frontpagemagazine.com (The Terror War, How We Can Win, 11/15/04).  He said:

During the last six years of my other life, as a Romanian intelligence general, the main task of the Soviet bloc espionage community was to transform Yasser Arafats war against Israel and its main supporter, the United States, into an armed doctrine of the whole Islamic world. America was our main enemy, and a billion adversaries could inflict far greater damage on it than could a mere one million. Islamic anti-Semitism ran deep. Our task was to convert its historical hatred of the Jews into a new hatred of the United States, by portraying this land of freedom as an imperial Zionist country financed by Jewish money and run by a rapacious Council of the Elders of Zion, the Kremlins epithet for the US Congress.

According to KGB theorists, the Islamic world was a petri dish in which we could nurture a virulent strain of America-hate. Islamic cultures had a taste for nationalism, jingoism and victimology. Their illiterate, oppressed mobs could be whipped up to a fever pitch. Terrorism and violence against America would flow naturally from their religious fervor. We had only to keep repeating, over and over, that the United States was a Zionist country bankrolled by rich Jews. Islam was obsessed with preventing the infidels occupation of its territory, and it would be highly receptive to our dogma that American imperialism wanted to transform the rest of the world into a Jewish fiefdom.

   Vladimir Putin created paranoia toward his opponents in the November 2007 elections in Russia.  Alex Alexiev wrote (Frontpage Magazine 12/6/2007):

It began with the unusually strident anti-western and anti-American propaganda campaign unleashed by the Kremlin, complete with lurid tales of CIA plots to overthrow the government, that eerily echoed Stalinist times, as did Putin's angry denunciations of his political opponents as paid agents of Russia's foreign enemies. In what may be a reflection of the man's paranoid views, he accused the former communists and their liberal victims both of having willfully destroyed the great Soviet Union. 

   It's quite possible that Putin really believes that those who call for Democracy including the United States were willfully destroying the Soviet Union.  Glastnost led to many countries breaking away from the Soviet Union and one of Vladimir Putin's concerns is that those countries will join in a military alliance with the West.  It is also possible that the United States did want the breakup of the Soviet Union which had been a formidable enemy for such a long time and which under Putin is a formidable enemy again. 

Nashi (Ours, in Russian), is a pro-Putin youth movement.

Adi Ignatius wrote in Time Magazine that:

I went to Nashi's Moscow headquarters ... and met with Lyubov Serikova, a pretty 22-year-old redhead from Russia's Chuvash Republic who is a rising star in the organization. She was thrilled with the recent election and credited Nashi with helping thwart an unnamed enemy's attempt to launch an "orange revolution" in Russia. Her world seemed conspiratorial, and she echoed Putin's own statements: those who run against the President were trying to bring the country down. Putin, she said, "has made Russia a leading country in just a few years."

When we finish talking, I take a look at an official Nashi poster hanging outside her office, which excoriates U.S. policies. It's reminiscent of Soviet-era propaganda with its non sequitur acceleration of hysteria: "Tomorrow there will be war in Iran. The day after tomorrow Russia will be governed externally!" But this is no fringe group. Putin frequently visits Nashi's training camps and meets with its leaders. And from there he sometimes launches anti-Western tirades, including a recent blast at London authorities who are demanding the extradition of the suspected killer of Litvinenko.
 

   Regarding Russia, Ralph Peters wrote:

Russian paranoia is immeasurable, with malice toward all and charity toward none.

   After the Democratic convention in the United States that nominated Kerry, President Bush raised the terror threat.   Bush was beseiged by left wing critics who claimed that he raised the terror threat to stall Kerry's momentum.  One consequence of this creation of paranoia is that President Bush felt it necessary to defend himself by revealing that his reason was information gleaned by the British and Pakistanis when they arrested Mohammed Nasin Noor Khan in Pakistan on July 13.  According to Dick Morris (New York Post 8/11/04):

This unfortunate release of information reportedly crippled ongoing British efforts to use Khan - or at least his computer and e-mail - to communicate with, and therefore identify, his al Qaeda colleagues.

  John Podhoretz in an article called "Anti-War Psychosis" (NYPost 3/11/02) wrote:

Say this for the anti-war movement and its fellow travelers in the media: They're succeeding in driving everybody crazy, including themselves...

Craziest of all, however, is the logic of those who have decided to man the front lines in the anti-war movement: They seem to have convinced themselves that the coming war isn't about what George W. Bush says it's about.  It's not about ridding the world of weapons of mass destruction now in the hands of a dictator who has broken every U.N. resolution he ever signed. 

No, it's about oil.  Or it's about revenge...Or it's about Bush dominating the planet due to his cowboy fantasies.  Or it's about a bunch of Jews in and around Washington secretly manipulating stupid goyim into letting Israel commit genocide and get away with it...

Among those who prefer hate to love are the leaders of the anti-war movement , who have chosen to believe the very worst of those with whom they disagree, In the process, they have induced in themselves a kind of poltiical psychosis...

I know this political psychosis well, because I have seen it at work in conservative ideological quarters during the Clinton years.  Many Clinton-haters would believe anything, literally anything, about Bill Clinton.  They wanted to   believe it...

George W. Bush is grappling with Iraq out of the very highest of motives - to protect and defend the American people and the world in the new, post 9/11 strategic reality.  The inability of those who dislike him to grant him even that much is a mark of how politcally psychotic they have become.

   Why do so many members of the anti-war movement believe these things?  Why do they want to believe these things?  One possibility is that believing that Bush has justifiable reasons for his actions would weaken their ability to defeat him.

   Perhaps the most successful creation of paranoia was accomplished by Prince Abdullah, the de facto ruler of Saudia Arabia when he visited Bush's ranch in Crawford, Tex., in April of 2002.  Glen Kessler wrote in the Washington Post (6/3/03):

In a scene that one senior Bush adviser later likened to "a near-death
experience," Abdullah arrived at Crawford with a book showing pictures of
Palestinian suffering and a 10-minute videotape of images of children shot
and crushed by Israelis that had appeared on Arab television.

The adviser said Abdullah spoke eloquently about what these images meant --
conveying a respect for life rather than a hatred of Israel -- and then laid
it on the line for Bush: Was he going to do something about this or not?

Bush replied that he was working on a vision and would present it soon, the
current and former officials said.

"It certainly made an impact on the president," one official said.

Few leaders had ever spoken so directly to Bush. The president, the official
said, concluded that Abdullah was a good person who has a vision of where he
wants to lead his country. Since then, the president frequently asks aides
whether Abdullah believes Bush is living up to the commitments he made at
Crawford.

The video with pictures of Israeli tanks crushing Arab children were undoubtedly creations of the Arab propaganda machine.  They were very effective in making Bush paranoid toward Israel who since then has aggressively pressured Israel into following a roadmap of territorial concessions and uprooting of Israeli settlements in exchange for Arab promises to fight terror, promises the Arabs already made when they signed the Oslo accords and failed to keep.

   Creating the myth that the Holocaust is a fabrication created by Jews to gain sympathy is a widespread Arab tactic.  Phyllis Chesler in her book The New Antisemitism, quotes Al-Hayat Al-Jadidah (The Jews and the Media Monopoly, July 2, 1998) about this:

Everywhere, the Jews have been the subjects of hatred and disdain because they control most of the economic resources upon which the livelihoods of many people are dependent...Teh winds began blowing in their favor when the campaign of persecution against them was begun by Hitler the Nazi...The international Jewish communications media under their control exploited this in the best possible way, and then the show started.   They begain to disseminate frightful pictures of mass executions and invented the shocking story of the gas ovens, where Hitler allegedly burned them...They focused on women, children and old people and have exploited this to arouse sympathy for themselves when demanding financial compensation, donations and grants from all over the world.

The truth is that the persecution of the Jews is a deceitful myth which the Jews have labeled the Holocaust and have exploted to get sympathy...And even if it is possible that Hitler's assautl against the Jews hurt them a little, the fact is it did tem a clear service whose fruits they are reaping until today.

Phyllis points out that:

Palestinians seem to be accusing the Jews of doing exactly what I am accusing the Palestinians of doing: creating deceptive propaganda about a nonexistent genocide for the purpose of gaining sympathy, money, and power.

   Mabel Elliott in her book, Beginning Again at Ararat wrote about the creation of paranoia by the Tsar of Russia. She wrote:

    When, after the disastrous Russian Japanese war of 1905, the Tsar refilled his treasury by confiscating the wealth of the churches, the peoples of the Caucasus were driven to a frenzy.  There were mass meetings, demonstrations, riots, and a sudden lovefeast of all the peoples.   Armenians, Georgians, Tartars, united to resist the Tsar's attacks on their churches.  Such friendliness among his subject peoples was the most imminent danger to the Tsar; if ever they were united his throne would be destroyed as by a hurricane.   The Russian secret police desperately hastened to avert such a calamity as friendliness among the races of the Russian empire.

    In Baku they disarmed the Armenians and gave arms to the Tartars.  Then hundreds of them, working among the ignorant Tartar masses, inflamed their minds with stories of Armenian atrocities, until on a certain day they distributed free vodka to all the armed Tartars, withdrew the police from the city, and led the drunken mobs into the Armenian quarter.  The massacre was one of the  most terrible in Armenian history; for days afterwards thosuands fo bodies lay piled in the streets.  The whole Armenian quarter was burned; even the oil wells owned by Armenians were set on fire.  The sky was covered with black smoke, the blazing oil ran out over the waters of the Caspian Sea until even it seemed to be burning, and all the passions of ignorant men crazed by vodka rioted through this inferno during three days and nights.  Satisfied, the Tsar's secret police brought back the Cossacks; the carnage ceased in a ruined city.  The desire of the Tsar ahd been attained; there was no more love between Armenian and Tartar. 

    The war between Tartars and Armenians did not cease during fifteen years.  From the massacres of 1905 until the establishing fo the Armenian Soviet government in 1920 there was constant war between Armenian and Tartar villages everywhere int he Caucasus.  Men ventured from tehir villages only in armed groups; the life of a Tartar in an Armenian village of that o fan Armenian in a Tartar village was worth no more than the shortest possible time required to kill him.  Every effort of the leaders of both races to stop this slaughter, to make peace betweent he peoples, was thwarted by the Russian secret police.  So long as the peoples could be kept killing each other, they would not turn against the Tsar.

Xib Creation of Paranoia to Overcome Competition

One would think that Al Qaeda would be part of the cheering squad for Hezbollah after Hezbollahs rocket attacks on Israel in 2006. Instead Al Qaeda sees Hezbollah as stealing their glory and worse their leadership in the Jihad against Israel. A speech allegedly made by Sheikh Abu Abdul Rahman, a senior Al Qaeda leader, has surfaced on a jihadi pro al-Qaeda website in which Rahman is cited as condemning the "infidel Hizbullah" and "the most corrupted regimes of Syria and Iran. (Lappin, Y., Al Qaeda Member: Hizbullah Backed by Evil, Ynet News.com 8/27/2006)

"We need to know the reality, and we already know how Hizbullah do not fight for the sake of Allah. They declare themselves that they

fight for the sake of Lebanon, are backed by the most corrupted regimes Syria and Iran and backed by the most evil people. We cannot be fools to die for nationalism and tribalism, if two entities of Kuffar (infidels) fight that does not bother us. What bothers us is if we side with any one of them Hizbullah has been the shield for the northern border of Israel, just like the eastern and southern shield is Jordan and the western shield is Egypt. These shields are all to prevent any Mujahideen (holy warriors) from entering Israel or to attack them. We remember when al-Qaeda launched rockets from southern Lebanon, it was Hizbullah who rose to defend Israel and condemned it and threatened to cut the hand of those responsible if they caught them.

Thats funny, I dont remember when Hezbollah defended Israel against rockets. I must be getting forgetful in my old age because that is something I think I would remember.

XII Creation of Paranoia to get Revenge

   Senator Lieberman opposed some aspects of the Democrat's health care agenda so Blogger Jane Hamsher got revenge by accusing his wife, Mrs. Lieberman of being a lobbyist who should be fired from her position as global ambassador for the Susan G. Komen for the Cure breast cancer charity.  Only problem is that Mrs. Lieberman is not and never has been a lobbyist.  Kathleen Parker wrote an article about this for the Washington Post.  The comments in response to the article shocked me because they justify Hamsher's revenge on Senator Lieberman.

  In my article Creation of Paranoia that appeared in the International Bulletin of Political Psychology I discuss how religious leaders created paranoia to those who rejected their message because of the hostility they felt toward those who rejected it.  At the time I had not yet read the excellent book The Sword of the Prophet by Serge Trifkovic. In that book he has a chapter on Muhammad and describes what his scholarship has led him to believe led Muhammad to turn against the non-believer.   He writes that Muhammad started preaching to friends and family and that in about 613 AD he decided to go public with his "revelations".  Serge writes:

The beginning of Muhammad's ministry, received with indifference or derision by most Meccans was slow...

His opponents, led by one Abu Jahl, suspected Muhammad of harboring political ambitions and seeking the position of leadership in the city.  A mob raged against Muhammad, the "divider" who wanted to tell real men what they can and cannot do, calling him a blasphemous unbeliever. 

   Serge writes how in the beginning Muhammad was hoping to convert Jews and Christians and how in his Meccan revelations Muhammad wrote:

Do not argue with the "People of the Book, ... but say 'We believe in the Revelation which has come down to us and in that which came down to you."  At that time he allowed for the possibility that Jews and Christians could attain salvation.   They, and his own followers, "any who believe in God and the Last Day and work righteousness shall have their reward with their Lord: on them shall be no fear, nor shall they grieve."  It was only later, in Medina, when Muhammad's prophetic claims were rejected by Jews and Christians, that his position underwent complete change to uncompromising hostility and justification of violence.

   When Muhammad would tell tales delineating the life of the patriarchs and prophets and giving examples of divine retribution that fallen on impious nations, al-Nadr of the Quraysh tribe, would speak after him and say" "Listen now to things which are as good as those with which Muhammad has entertained you."  Serge writes that al-Nadr:

would then relate the marvelous exploits of the Persian heroes Rustam and Isfendiar, adn finally ask his enchanted audience: "Are the stories of Muhammad more beautiful than mine?  He is spouting ancient legends that he has gathered from the mouths of men more learned than he." 

In a battle with the Quraysh, Muhammad's followers captured al-Nadr.  As the corpses of Muhammad's enemies were cast into a pit Muhammad said "Woe unto this people! Ye have rejected me, your Prophet!"  Muhammad then proceded to kill the prisoners.  Al-Nadr bitterly complained that had the Quraysh taken Muslims prisoner, they would never have killed them.  Even were it so, "Muhammad scornfully replied, "I am not as thou and Islam hath rent all bounds asunder."   Al-Nadr was then beheaded.

Trifkovic writes:

Another condemned pleaded for his life, asking who would take care of his little girl.  "Hell-fire," Muhammad replied, and as the victim was slain, he added, "I give thanks unto the Lord that hath slain thee, and comforted mine eyes thereby!"...

After his victory at Badr, Muhammad returned to Medina in triumph and proceeded to settle scroes with his detractors there.  An atmosphere of fear descended on the city; informers passed all disrespectful or merely careless remarks to the prophet...His first victim was Asma bint Marwan, a poetess who disliked both Muhammad personally and the religion he preached.  In one poem, she urged her fellow tribesmen not to obey a stranger who did not belong among them...  Muhammad exclaimed, "Will no one rid me of this daughter of Marwan?"  one of his followers by the name of Umayr duly did, that same night, stabbing her as she nursed her youngist child... 

In Mecca, Muhammad had hoped to be accepted as God's messenger by the Jews and to win them over by ordering his followers to turn in the direction of Jerusalem during prayer, and adopting the Jewish Day of Atonement, Ashura, as the Muslim holy day. 

   The Jews did not accept Muhammad as God's messenger.  Trifkovic writes that:

The perceived slight, as was customary with him (Muhammad), turned into rage.  

   Muhammad then engaged in ethnic cleansing and genocide of Jews.   Trifkovic writes:

The first stage consisted of individual murders of Jews, the second entailed the expulsion of two tribes from Medina; the third was completed with the slaughter of one remaining tribe.  ...He first received a divine warning that the Jewish tribe of Banu Nadir plotted his death, and promptly ordered them to leave Medina within ten days.   At first they refused; but after a siege of several weeks, they surrendered and were expelled.  All of their considerable belongings and land were distributed among Muhammad's faithful.  (They were slaughtered two years later in their new abode.) His own royal fifth finally made him a wealthy man.  The visible and very tangible benefits of being Muslim acted as a powerful inducement of the remaining doubters to embrace Islam, even if they remained unconvinced by Muhammad's preaching.

   Muhammad accused the last Jewish tribe in Medina, the Banu Qurayzah of disloyalty and complicity with the Meccans.  Trifkovic writes:

Muhammad offered the men conversion to Islam as an alternative to death; upon their refusal, up to 900 were decapitated at the ditch, in front of their women and children...   Truly the judgment of Allah was pronounced on high" was Muhammad's comment...   The women were subsequently raped;  Muhammad chose as his concubine one Raihana  bint Amr, whose father and husband were both slaughtered before her eyes only hours earlier; such treatment had already been sanctioned by prophetic revelation.As for the captured husbands fathers, sons, or brothers, the messages now grew even harsher; "Take him and fetter him and expose him to hell fire.  And then insert him in a chain whereof the length is seventy cubits.  (Koran 69:30-37)  Those are the lucky ones; others "will be killed or crucified, or have their hands and feet on alternative sides cut off" (5:33-34)In this world, for the captured infidel, "we have prepared chains, yokes and a blazing fire." (76:4)

  According to the New York Post of July 9, 2001, Moammar Khadafy has at least partly staked his career on as making the United States out as the sworn enemy of Muslims worldwide.  On Sunday July 8, 2001, Moammar Khadafy warned rapt Muslim followers in the Zambian capital of Lusaka. 

I say, beware of the Americans,do not allow them any influence in your countries...The Americans are infiltrating everywhere, using their intelligence agencies.  See the Muslims fighting in Nigeria.  It is the work of the Americans, spreading suspicion and confusion. 

He also said that the United States is a cutthroat global troublemaker masterminding violence everywhere.  The Libyan leader's description of the United States could better describe himself as he played a role in the Pan Am Flight 103 bombing over Lockerbie Scotland.  United States warplanes bombed Libya in 1986 for ties to terrorist organizations so one of his motives for incitement against the United States may be a desire for revenge..

XIII Creation of Paranoia To Divert Hostility and Shift Blame

Early in January 2004 in Iraq, Charles Graner, handed Joe Darby a couple of CDs to duplicate.  So Joe went down to the Internet cafe near the sleeping quarters and started duping the discs.  Graner hadn't given him any warning about special files or secret folders, and Joe was sitting there scrolling through the images, mindlessly, when bam!, the first hideous photo came up.    Then another.  Then another.  Then another.

He said,"What the heck is this?" remembers Janis Karpinski, the Brigadier General who ran Abu Ghraib.  "It was very innocent.  He was absolutely shocked by this."

Late one night, he slipped a copy of the disc under the door of the army's Criminal Investigation Division...

On campuses and in the halls of government, even within the upper echelons of the military command, few would question what Joe had done.  But in his own hometown, plenty of people did...  Joe Darby's decision didn't make him honorable; it made him a traitor.  (The Conscience of Joe Darby, Gentleman's Quarterly September 2004)

   Several of the people involved in the Abu Graib scandal were from towns near where Joe Darby lived.  The message of disgrace he bought back to his neighborhood angered people who blamed him.  His home was vandalized and the army found it necessary to put him and his family in protective custody.  This is an example of how people blame the messenger rather than face that the soldiers that they were so proud engaged in disgraceful behavior.

     When the Corona virus outbreak started in Wuhan China in 2020 doctors who reported on it were arrested.  We know that one of them got the virus and died.  Wuhan is where China's biological warfare lab is located.  Tom Cotton a U.S. senator said that the virus might have been created in the lab in Wuhan.  The Chinese said it was probably transferred to humans from a snake or bat in a market in Wuhan.  Tom Cotton pointed out that the first patient had not been to that market.  The Chinese government was clearly trying to cover things up.  Was it because they were trying to prevent panic or was it because they knew the virus had escaped their lab?  I am skeptical that a country would create a virus that they couldn't control and that could kill their own people but Tom was right to ask the question. 

      The Chinese population was angry at their government for silencing those who warned about the virus.  The Chinese government is shifting blame from itself by blaming the United States.   According to the Washington Times

 China, Russia and Iran are flooding the global information space with false claims about the new coronavirus, according to U.S. officials, who say one of the biggest lies — that the virus that causes COVID-19 is a U.S. bioweapon and was brought to China by U.S. Army personnel — is just the latest in a “surge of propaganda” aimed at undermining America’s image on the world stage. Beijing, Moscow and Tehran are using a vast web of social media accounts, fake news outlets and state-controlled global satellite media to promote false claims by academics and, at times, government officials to blame Washington for the crisis now gripping most of humanity.

     Jews have been accused of creating the Corona virus.  Actress Rosanna Arquette is under fire from most corners of civilized society after she accused the nation of Israel of being part of a conspiracy to spread the COVID-19 virus, known as the coronavirus. In a tweet posted Tuesday, Mar 17 2020, the 60-year-old actress claimed Israel has been working on a vaccine for coronavirus for over a year. She insinuated that Jews were essentially allowing the outbreak to spread to heighten profits from a potential vaccine.  Oxford researchers questioned thousands of English people about the coronavirus in May 2020. The study found that fully one in five English people concur with the false assertion that Jews are behind the pandemic, saying that they agreed to varying extents with the statement “Jews have created the virus to collapse the economy for financial gain.” 

 In Turkey, a senior official who is close to the president said that the virus “serves Zionist interests” and Turkish bloggers said that the Jews created the virus in order to take over the world.

Iran’s PressTV ran a piece clearly insinuating that Israel and the US deliberately “engineered” the novel coronavirus as a form of biological warfare against the Iranian and Chinese regimes.

   Charlie Hebdo is a French satirical magazine.  The magazine published cartoons about Muhammad and became the target of two terrorist attacks one in 2011 and the other in 2015.  On 7 January 2015, two Islamist gunmen (directed by an "Al Qaeda cell in Yemen") forced their way into and opened fire in the Paris headquarters of Charlie Hebdo, killing twelve, including staff cartoonists Charb, Cabu, Honor, Tignous and Wolinski, economist Bernard Maris and two police officers, and wounding eleven, four of them seriously.

During the attack, the gunmen shouted "Allahu akbar" ("God is great" in Arabic) and also "the Prophet is avenged".

Those cries have not prevented French Muslims from blaming the terrorist attacks on the Jews.  Daniel Greenfield wrote:

The man, who gave his named as Mohamed, also said he was a devout Muslim but then changed his demeanor and added, grinning, that he was also a delinquent. Then he said he was a drug dealer and without prompting, invited the reporter into the (also very clean) gas station to show an array of hashish for sale in broad daylight on a shelf next to the ATM.

He also called the Paris terrorist attacks un complot, or conspiracy, and launched into a lengthy explanation of the magical Jews behind it. They were not ordinary Jews, he said, but a hybrid race of shape shifters who have extraordinary abilities. They know how to get in everywhere, he said. They are master manipulators.

You might dismiss him as a lunatic, except that minus the shape shifting part, this is the mainstream narrative in the Muslim world.

   In 2013 pressure cooker  bombs full of nails and  ball bearings were detonated next to the Boston Marathon killing 3 including an 8 year old child and maiming many more.  This is the type of bomb used in IEDs in the Middle East by Muslims.  These types of pressure cooker explosives have been used in Afghanistan, India, Nepal and Pakistan, according to a July 2010 joint FBI and Homeland Security intelligence report. One of the three devices used in the May 2010 Times Square attempted bombing by a Muslim was a pressure cooker, the intelligence report said.  In addition multiple explosions occurred one shortly after the other which is a hallmark of Al Qaeda.  Despite this the New York Post pointed out that the explosions occurred during tax day and reported that authorities think that it is a domestic terrorist who was responsible.  Who is the most likely person who would be angry at taxes?  Why a member of the Tea Party of course.  Tea Partiers are opposed to the enormous spending and borrowing by the U.S. government and especially the Obama administration.  The terrorist acts committed at the Boston Marathon were an opportunity to smear them as terrorists by saying that we don't know that Muslim terrorists are responsible and pointing out that it was tax day.   Obama advisor David Axelrod And Im sure what was going through the presidents mind is we really dont know who did this, Axelrod said. It was Tax Day.

MSNBC talking head Chris Matthews blamed those on the Right, stating incorrectly that, Normally, domestic terrorists, people tend to be on the far right. Rep. William Keating (D-Mass.) played along on the TV show, also suggesting the bombing could have something to do with Tax Day.

Now, we have an international event, the marathon, the oldest marathon, Keating said. And we also have Tax Day, April 15, so we dont know if thats the kind of symbol a domestic terrorist might use as well.

Philip Hodges wrote:

Even a Senior U.S. Counterterrorism expert told CNN that the use of pressure cookers in explosives is a signature for right-wing extremists. Never mind the fact that the supposed right-wing terrorists never used pressure cookers in their explosives.

And never mind the fact that it was an Al-Qaeda publication that recommended the use of pressure cookers to their aspiring terrorist readership. In a 2010 article entitled, How to Make a Bomb in Your Moms Kitchen, it listed which ingredients would be needed in order to make an explosive device from common household appliances. But it said that the prescribed concoction only works in a highly pressurized environment. The pressure cooker is the most effective method, it advised...

 And never mind the fact that using pressure cookers in IEDs have already been done many times in the Middle East and in the U.S. by Islamic terrorists. Breitbart detailed a few examples:

• In 2010, militants in Pakistan attacked the office of Christian aid organization World Vision and killed six workers there, all Muslim. After shooting workers, the terrorists exploded a locally made pressure cooker bomb.
• Also in 2010, Faizal Shahzad attempted a bombing near Times Square by leaving explosives, including a pressure cooker bomb, in car a near Times Square.
• In 2011, police seized two pressure cooker bombs from the hotel room of Naser Abdo, who planned to use them to bomb Fort Hood in Texas.

Yet, somehow this pressure cooker phenomenon is a right-wing thing.

    When it became evident that the bombings were carried out by Islamic extremists the media made excuses.

    When Ilhan Omar was asked about Islamic extremism she said that we should fear white men more.  Many Muslims are white men.  You can see her making this accusation in the video below.  In fact the man interviewing her is a white Muslim.  This is her way to deflect blame away from Muslims.  She takes advantage of feminist and black paranoia toward white men.   Muslims make up a minority of Americans yet have committed or attempted to commit a large number of terror attacks in the United States. See here for attacks in the U.S..  There are non-Muslim terrorists in the United States, in fact according to some web sites there have been years in which the more people have been killed by non-Muslim terrorists than by Muslim ones but that doesn't mean there is no reason to fear Muslim ones of that the Muslim religion is not responsible for Muslim terrorism.   This picture is a reminder of that.

  There is a video of Ilhan Omar deflecting blame to white men below. 

Here is a video of the President of Egypt (before he was president) saying the Jews are bloodsuckers and the descendants of apes and pigs.

When confronted by American senators about his statements Morsi blamed it on the Zionists control of the American media.

Well, I think we all know that the media in the United States has made a big deal of this and we know the media of the United States is controlled by certain forces and they dont view me favorably,

    On Feb 13, 2012 the wife of the Israeli embassy's chief security officer was injured when a bomb exploded in her car in New Delhi, India.  The same day a staffer of the Israeli embassy in Tbilisi, Georgia discovered a bomb underneath his car as he was driving to the embassy.  Iranian Foreign Ministry spokesman Ramin Mehmanparast said that "Israel perpetrated the terror actions to launch psychological warfare against Iran".  He said that such actions were in Israel's "innate nature," adding that Iran condemns terrorism in the strongest terms.

    ISIS is an organization of terrorist Muslims attempting to create a caliphate in Iraq and Syria who have massacred everyone in their path who isn't Sunni or a woman.  The infidel women they make into sex slaves. Five articles in 6 weeks in PA's official newspaper blame the United States for establishing the Islamic State, to divide and control the Muslim world.  Iraqis also blame the U.S. for creating ISIS.

   In March 2011 Arabs infiltrated the home of Udi and Ruth Fogel and massacred them. 

Jeff Jacoby wrote:

    On New Years Eve of 2011 Muslims bombed an Egyptian Coptic church .  21 Christians worshippers died.  The Egyptian and Middle Eastern media were full of reports blaming Israel.  Iran's official TV outlet, Press TV broadcast that "It goes without saying that no Muslim, whatever their political leanings may be, will ever commit such an inhumane act."

    On July 20, 2011 David Miller wrote:

When a European laboratory announced two weeks ago that an infected shipment of Egyptian fenugreek seeds was the source of an E. coli epidemic that killed 48 Germans and a Swede, the Egyptian agriculture minister didnt apologize, nor did he call for an investigation into the matter.

The problem had nothing to do with Egypt, the minister, Ayman Abu-Hadid, told Egyptian press.

"Israel is waging a commercial war against Egyptian exports," he explained, and with that the case was closed.

    This is a classic example of creating paranoia in order to divert blame.

    On April 14, 2014, the Muslim terrorist group Boko Haram kidnapped more than 300 girls in a boarding school in Chibok, Nigeria. Nafeez Ahmed of the Guardian blamed the kidnapping on Climate Change.   Combatting Climate Change is also a way that the left can prove they are doing something good as all their policies lead to disaster.  President Obama and Secretary of State Kerry are losing the world to Russia and China as the American dollar loses its value and America's debt keeps skyrocketing but at least they can say that they are fighting the chimera of Climate Change.

    Most of the world has had record cold winters in 2014 yet like Don Quixote they keep on battling the windmill of climate change.

    Women are considered the evil source of desire by Islam.  This may be because men seek to blame their own feelings of sexual shame on some one else.  It also may be that Muhammad and the Muslims who followed him wanted men to dominate over women.  A consequence of believing women are evil and desiring them at the same time may be a desire to control her.  She should do what I want because she's evil the thinking might go.  This may be part of the logic Muslim men use when they rape infidel women who are not covered enough by Islamic standards.  The idea that sexual desire toward someone who one is not married to is bad may be part of the reason the religious police in countries like Saudi Arabia beat women who aren't covered to their requirements. 

    When women are raped they are assumed to be the guilty party unless they can provide 4 male witnesses proving that they were raped.  Since they then are considered guilty of seduction and they are in the Islamic mind evil, the men who imprison them feel entitled to rape them further.   If a woman is in trouble for other reasons they are raped as well.  Chala Chafiq gave the religious rationale for doing this in Iran: (Le Nouvel Homme Islamiste: La Prison Politique en Iran (The New Islamist Man: The Political Prison in Iran):

A woman's rape is frequently the last act that precedes her execution. This is explained by the rule in Iranian political prisons that the sentence of execution cannot be carried out if the woman is a virgin.  Since there is a theological belief that if a woman dies a virgin she will go to heaven, the politically active virgin is forced to "marry" before her execution and thus to insure she will go to hell.  She is forced to "marry" the hangman who will carry out her execution.

   For more about this see Women and Islam.

    Since Hamas took over Gaza divorce and abuse of women has risen.  An anti-Israel European NGO blamed Israel for this.  Previously the Goldstone Report said no less than eight times that Israel, by attacking Gaza in response to Hamas rockets, was violating the Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination against Women.
 

   On New Years Eve, 2011 an Islamic jihad-martyrdom suicide bomber murdered twenty-two people and wounded eighty more at the Coptic Christian Church of the Saints in Alexandria, Egypt.  Egypt receives billions of aid from the United States which such an attack could jeopardize.  Egyptian President Hosni Mubarak claimed that foreign hands a terrorist operation that is alien to us, rather than homegrown jihadists, carried out the attack. All of Egypt is targeted, Mubarak went on, digging deeper. This blind terrorism does not differentiate between Copts and Muslims.

Robert Spencer pointed out that:

Yet no mosque was targeted, and no Muslim was killed. It was a remarkable coincidence that this blind terrorism that did not differentiate between Copts and Muslims struck at a Coptic church, killing only Christians and no Muslims at all.... Obamas statement was better than Mubaraks in that he acknowledged that the perpetrators of this attack were clearly targeting Christian worshipers. However, he also claimed that the attack killed and injured people from both the Christian and Muslim communities. No Muslims were actually killed or injured in the attack...Lebanese Shiite leader Sheikh Abdel Amir Kabalan said: This terrorist act bears the fingerprints of Zionists who keep on targeting religious sights [sic] and are working to sow discord between Muslims and Christians. Irans PressTV, in an unsigned editorial, struck a tone so similar as to give the impression that a set of talking points were being circulated: The fresh plot by terrorists to target churches is an organized Zionist scenario aimed at creating a rift between Muslims and Christians.

   Egypt is full of hate toward the Jews.  That became visually obvious during the demonstrations to overthrow Mubarak.  In response to the sarcastic question Whats a pro mubarak protester?, a commentator replies, Yeah good question, does he look like this., and posts the following cartoon.

Here is a video in which the Egyptian demonstrators express their hate of Israel.

In the above video an Egyptian protestors says:

The United States stand beside Hosni Mubarak one hundred percent, because they know if Hosni Mubarak fell, the whole people in Egypt they gonna be free. And if the people free in Egypt, they gonna go free the Palestinians! They gonna destroy Israel! The country that controls the United States is Israel!

    When terrorists executed a preplanned attack on the American embassy in Benghazi the Obama administration blamed it on a movie.  Bernice Lipkin wrote:

THERE IS A DARK SIDE to blaming the Benghazi attack on something that insulted Muslims instead of blaming Muslims for slaughtering Americans. In the days that followed the Benghazi massacre, blaming the anti-Islam movie encouraged world-wide protests and rioting and anti-Americanism. In Afganistan, they pelted police with stones and opened fire on them. The police had been told not to return the fire.

Indonesia's anti-terror squad arrested 11 people planning terror attacks against foreigners, including the U.S. Embassy. "Police seized a number of bombs, explosive materials, a bomb-making manual and ammunition, along with a small gas cylinder filled with highly explosive material during the Friday and Saturday raids in four cities, including the capital Jakarta." Muslims rioted in Sydney, Australia. The Pentagon sent Marines to protect embassies in Yemen and Sudan. on Sep 16, protesters gathered outside the US embassy in London to vent their anger. Altogether some twenty protests were recorded. Anger against America was not measured.

A viewer of the movie trailer asked: "Riddle me this Einstein. At the time the protests began in Egypt and Libya the anti-islamic video on youtube only had a little over 300 hits? So are you telling me that 300 plus viewers of this video caused all that violence?" Maybe all it took was the help of a large number of cooperative media people.

   Barney Frank and Senator Chris Dodd blocked attempts to regulate Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac and argued that they posed no danger to America's finances.  When the Office of Federal Housing Enterprise Oversight OFHEO issued a blistering report about Fannie Mae Barney Frank declared that a leadership change at OFHEO not Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac is overdue.  Pressure was brought to bear on banks to lower lending standards so that the poor would be able to afford housing.  This regulation resulted in loans being made to people who could not pay them back.

    Thomas Sowell wrote about how those responsible for creating the mortgage crisis disaster in the U.S. blamed others in his book the Housing Boom and Bust.  He wrote:

In addition to the more or less ad hoc scapegoating of others, many of the architects of the lower mortgage lending standards at the heart of the housing boom and bust more systematically created scapegoats by summoning before Congressional committees various business leaders or federal emloyees to be denounced on nationwide television or before other members of the mass media.  As the New York Times reported in September 2008: "Almost every member of the Senate Banking Committee wagged a finger at what they described as Wall street's greed and lax regulatory oversight."  This is the Committeee chaired by Senator Chrisopher Dodd...  Congressman Barney Frank likewise went on the offensive after the mortgage bust...  The financial crisis was caused by "bad decisions that were made by people in the private sector." Congressman Frank said in 2008, "thanks to a conservative philosophy that says the market knows best." "We are in a worldwide crisis now because of excessive deregulation," he said...

Survival in the market often requires recognizing mistakes and changing course while survival in politics often requires denying mistakes, continuing  the current policies and blaming the bad consequences on others.

Jack McNicholas was a detective in the NYPD who wrote an article about racial profiling after a Harvard professor Henry Louis Gates Jr. accused a policeman of racism who was investigating a report of a break in into his house.  He wrote:

 How about this novel approach, "Certainly, here's my ID and thanks for the quick response Sergeant."?...

after the So please, ponder this for a moment. Who do you think is terrorizing the black community? Who do you think is raping and assaulting young black women? Who do you think is pulling out the nine and shooting young male blacks on the corner over a bag of Cheez Doodles and a Philly blunt?

Pause and ask yourself why do you think more blacks and Hispanics are stopped? Because, you guessed it, they are the ones committing the crimes and fitting the description. The Police Department is not making this up. This is the horrible truth. The carnage is appalling, and rather than address the real issue, liberals and civil rights leaders make excuses and ignore the facts.

The tactic of shifting blame was a methodology of the KGB. Lt. General Ion Macepa the former acting Chief of Romanias espionage service said, in a discussion with Frontpage Magazine that:

Khrushchev introduced a new "methodology" for wet affairs" (the KGBs euphemism for bloody operations), requiring: (1) political assassinations be handled strictly orally; (2) any evidence pointing to the KGB should be dismissed out of hand as ridiculous; (3) after each political assassination the KGB was surreptitiously to spread "evidence" accusing the CIA or other convenient "enemies" of having done the deed. Indeed, since Khrushchev, Russias political police has never owned up to any political crime

The night of November 20, 1998 was shattering for millions of Russians: Galina Starovoitova, the countrys leading female critic of the KGB, now re-baptized as the FSB, was also shot dead while entering her apartment building. Her most trusted aide, Ruslan Linkov, was shot as well, but he survived. While some 10,000 mourners gathered to pay their respects to Galina, Ruslan was visited by his worst nightmareVladimir Putin, the head of the FSB. Putin held Ruslans hand for more than an hour and kept reassuring him: Its all going to be okay. Its all going to be okay.[1][2] It wasnt. During the following investigations, Putins FSB insinuated that Ruslan had killed Galina.

Andrei Piontkovsky (author of Another Look into Putins Soul) told Frontpage Magazine that Kremlin propaganda accuses Western intelligence agencies of the murder of Anna Politkovskaya and Alexander Litvinenko, and accuses the United States of sinking the submarine Kursk and of being behind the massacre of children in Beslan.

Putin in a speech in Munich accused the United States of US of establishing, or trying to establish, a "uni-polar" world.

"What is a uni-polar world? No matter how we beautify this term, it means one single centre of power, one single centre of force and one single master," he said. This accusation of the United States trying to be master of the world and being unipolar is a good description of Putins behavior, coercing other countries by threatening to cut off their oil, buying up other gas companies in Europe, taking control of the Russian Press, eliminating opposition, threatening European countries if they installed missile defenses against North Korea and Iran, and selling missile defenses to protect Irans nuclear factories.

J.R. Nyquist in an article titled One Clenched Fist (May 2007?) wrote that Russian radio news broadcasters have been ordered to make 50 percent of their reporting on Russia positive, and that the United States is from now on to be described as Russias enemy. Nyquist continued:

The Chinese, like the Russians, have carefully crafted their excuse for enmity. And like the Russians, they will blame the American side. The Chinese government, through its official organ (The People's Daily), says that U.S. Right-wing forces are determined to destroy a "fragile" Sino-U.S. relationship. The American side has supposedly manufactured an imaginary "China threat." A typical column published by The People's Daily rhetorically asks: "Why Does U.S. Preach 'China Military Threat'?" According to Beijing's official organ, the Americans are determined to misread China's intentions. "In the opinion of the United States," says the Daily, "... it is still the traditional countries [like Russia and China] that constitute strategic threats." The People's Daily has also stated: "U.S. Right-wing forces ... have all along clung to the Cold War mentality and held fast to the principle of containment in their policy toward China." The People's Daily bitterly complains that the Americans oppose Chinese military expansion in Asia. Psychologically, the outrage expressed by Beijing inadvertently reveals the malevolence of China's leaders. After all, why would The People's Daily express outrage at U.S. opposition to Chinese military expansion? Only a would-be aggressor feels thwarted by the collective security arrangements of neighboring countries. In fact, if we look at recent history we find that China has sent its armies against at least five neighboring countries since World War II: against Korea and the U.N. forces in 1950; against Tibet in 1950; against India in 1962; against Russia in 1969; and against Vietnam in 1979. Each instance involved a sudden, unprovoked strike against foreign forces outside China.

On May 10, 2007 the International Herald Tribune reported that Putin compared American Foreign Policy to the Third Reich. Putin delivered the speech from a podium in front of Lenins Mausoleum on Red Square as he marked Victory Day, the 62nd anniversary of the defeat of Nazi Germany. The International Herald Tribune (5/19/07) also reported how the Kremlin cracked down on small clusters of courageous Russians protesting President Vladimir Putin's authoritarian rule.

When the former chess champion Garry Kasparov's umbrella group of disparate opposition parties, The Other Russia, tried to congregate Saturday in Moscow's Pushkin Square, 9,000 paramilitary and city police showed up to intimidate fewer than 2,000 demonstrators, arresting hundreds. Government TV devoted copious coverage to a rally of Putin supporters and alluded to The Other Russia as "ultra-radicals" whose "unsanctioned march" was cut short by the police. Everything about the response to peaceable dissent was excessive. A leader of The Other Russia in St. Petersburg was detained as she was leaving home to attend the Sunday rally. A journalist was thrown into a paddy wagon for interviewing demonstrators being arrested After being arrested and released, Kasparov said Putin's Russia "is no longer a country where the government tries to pretend it is playing by the letter and spirit of the law." He classified the state that Putin built among the world's most notorious dictatorships, saying, "We now stand somewhere between Belarus and Zimbabwe."

  Elections were held in Russia and Putin won.  Although there are probably a lot of Russians who do support him we'll never know how  many because people were intimidated into voting for him.  He constantly had one of his opponents Kasparov arrested.  He is probably guilty of the murder of Anna Politskaya a reporter who criticized him. We'll never know how people would have voted if they knew what was wrong with Putin because has intimidated the media.  We'll never know if the elections were rigged because the Organization for Security and Cooperation in Europe, regarded in the West as the most authoritative election monitor, canceled plans to send observers.  Putin as most dictators do, blamed the United States.  He claimed the pullout was instigated by the United States to discredit the elections. But the OSCE said Russia delayed granting visas for so long that the organization would have been unable to meaningfully assess election preparations.  In my opinion it is likely that Putin lands to reabsorb Eastern Europe into the Soviet empire.  He has supplied Iran with anti-aircraft missiles to protect their nuclear weapons factories which is a major threat to the United States and ultimately to Russia.

    The Russian populace blames everything on the United States, perhaps Putin's control over the media has something to do with that.  Reuben Johnson wrote:

Americans in general and President Bush in particular are not very popular with the Russian populace these days and are generally blamed for all of the country's ills in the same way that the Jews were the scapegoats for every misfortune during Soviet times. One Moscow colleague told me recently that this "popular disease of blaming the U.S. for everything has reached almost epidemic proportions. The other day I heard some older, retired people talking about the high prices that we all pay in Moscow and--of course--that it is all the fault of Americans."

      Latin America is full of anti-capitalism and anti-gringo sentiments.  The authors of the book Guide to the Perfect Latin American Idiot Mendoza, Montener and Llosa point out that Latinos are shifting blame for the poverty of their countries from their own policies to those of the United States.  Mendoza et. al. give an example of Latin American thinking when they describe a popular book called How to Read Donald Duck.  The authors of How to Read Donald Duck,  Dorfman and Mattelar, both Marxists proposed to find hidden imperialist and capitalist messages in Disney stories.  Mendoza et. al. explain:

And what did they find?  Donald without his costume, that get-up that covers him, is of course, a pathological rogue.  He's also perverted because in his little fantasy world there is no sex, no procreation, no one knows who is whose child because cultivating this type of confusion around the characters' origins actually contributes to the enemy's reprehensible scheme: Disney," these two horrified researchers say, "masturbates his readers without physical contact.  He has created himself another aberration: an asexually sexual world.  This is most evident in the drawings themselves, and not so much in the dialogues."  Those depictions are sexist and - at the same time - emasculate, where the women are always coquettish and repressed if not slightly stupid and cowardly. 

Donald, Mickey, Pluto, and Goofy are not what they seem.  They are covert, right-wing agents, disseminated among children to ensure a relationship of domination between the motherland and her colonies.  The rich uncle is not an egocentric millionaire duck, and those things that happen to him are not entertaining adventures but a capitalist symbol directed at children to cultivate the rawest and most self-indulgent type of egoism.  Duckyland - a metaphor for the United States - is the cruel center of this world, while everyone else - in other words, we - comprise the exploited and exploitable periphery where inferior beings live.  There is no denying it: "Disney drives out everything productive and historic in this world, just like imperialism has prohibited everything productive and historic in the underdeveloped world.  Disney creates fantasies by subconsciously imitating how the world's capitalist system creates reality and how it wants to continue creating it."  No they're not ludicrous stories concocted to entertain children: "Donald Duck as its leader is promoting underdevelopment and the daily heart-wrenching of mankind in the Third World, this being the object of permanent enjoyment for the utopian kingdom of bourgeoisie freedom.  It simulates an eternal party where the only entertainment/repayment is the consumption of the sanitized symbols of the marginal: the consumption of an equivalently unbalanced world...  By reading Disneyland one swallows and digests the condition of being exploited."

As was to be expected, stupidity of this caliber was of course destined to become a bestseller in Latin America.  In 1993 the twenty -first anniversary of the first edition, this little book had been reprinted thirty-two times to the joy of the Mexican branch of Siglo XXI.  And even in our times of healthy skepticism, when it isn't polite to suck your thumb, there's no shortage of prudent revolutionaries who continue to recommend this as undeniable proof of imperial deception and also the intellectual shrewdness of our sharpest and most observant Marxists. 

Why does this book fit so perfectly into the Latin American idiot's ideal library collection?  Because it was written with a tone of paranoia, and there is nothing that excites our idiots' imagination more than believing that they are the object of an international conspiracy hatched to subjugate them.  For these untrusting souls there is always a "gringo" trying to deceive them, trying to steal their brains, fleecing them in financial centers, preventing them from designing automobiles or creating symphonic works, polluting their air, or conspiring with local accomplices on how to perpetuate the intellectual subordination that we Latin Americans suffer from. 

Another book discussed in the book the Perfect Latin American Idiot is called the Open Veins of Latin America.  The Open Veins book was given as a gift to Obama by Hugo Chavez.  The authors write:

The title, purely lyrical, is already an eloquent sample of what is to come.  Latin America is an inert continent, lying unconscious between the Atlantic and the Pacific, victim to the empires and villains who suck the blood out of its veins, in other words, from its immense natural resources.  The image is so plastic and so melodramatic that a progressive group of Argentine musicians have even written a protest song dedicated to it, whereas the Circulo de Lectores edition of this book from Columbia, illustrated by Marigot, displays on its over an enormous U.S. flag in the shape of a knife ruthlessly disemboweling a bleeding South America...

This book is a constant memorial to victimization and the identification of the villains who savagely torment us: those who import our raw materials; those who export goods, machinery, or capital to us; those multinationals that invest and those that don't invest; and international credit organizations (IMF, Inter-American Development bank, World bank, USAID).  Foreign aid is a trick to suck us dry even more.  If they loan us money they are trying to financially ruin us.  If they don't loan us money they are trying to strangle us...

   Of course Chavez is the one who is victimizing Venezuela, a country with so much oil that all its citizens should all be rich.  He has taken control of Venezuela's oil wealth and spends the money on weapons so he can extend his power.  He also has borrowed money from Russia which Venezuelans will have to pay back for years to come so that he can buy even more weapons and become even more powerful.   He has sunk his fangs in the oil veins of Venezuela and sucked up its oil wealth. 

   During Iranian protests of election results in which Ahmadinejad claiming victory against his opponent Mousavi a protestor Neda Agha Soltan was shot and her death infuriated the protestors even more.  The Iranian government tried to shift blame for her death.  The government accused  pro-Mousavi people of killing Neda.  Javan, a pro-government newspaper, blamed the recently expelled BBC correspondent, Jon Leyne, of hiring "thugs" to shoot her so he could make a documentary film (The Guardian June 24? 2009).

   Lebanese Prime Minister Rafik Hariri, who died in a car bomb explosion in 2005.  When a U.N. probe was expected to find Hezbollah guilty Hezbollah chief Hassan Nasrallah delivered television addresses claiming Israel was behind Hariri's killing and that spies working for Israel planted "false evidence" blaming Hezbollah.

   In an article titled "Cooking the Books on Hate Crimes" Michelle Malkin wrote about how the Arab-American Anti-Discrimination Committee (ADC) wants people to believe that a "post-9/11 backlash" has resulted in a nationwide wave of violence and bigotry against Muslims in America.  She writes that in order to concoct a Muslim hate crime epidemic, the ADC report lumps together faulty citations, dubious anecdotes and grossly overinflated claims.  One of their claims was about a Muslim student who was allegedly pelted with eggs at Arizona State University while assailants screamed "Die, Muslim, die!"  The student Ahmad Saad Nasim confessed to fabricating an attack on himself when cops interviewed him after he attempted a second hate crime hoax - in which he locked himself in a library restroom with the word "Die" written on his forehead, a plastic bag tied over his head and a racist note stuffed in his mouth.

Michelle writes:

To further pad the hate-crimes report, the ADC decries the "hostile commentary" of Middle East scholar Daniel Pipes, terrorism expert Steven Emerson, syndicated columnists Mona Charen, Jonah Goldberg and Ann Coulter, Washington Post columnists Richard Cohen and Charles Krauthammer, the Wall Street Journal editorial page, the Weekly Standard, National Review and Jewishworldreview.com, not to mention talk radio and the entertainment industry, as part of an orchestrated "campaign of racism."...

Herein lies the real agenda of the ADC, and other apologists for Islamic extermism: to liken outspoken critics to murderers, to equate speech with violence and to exploit victimhood status in a cynical attempt to distract attention from the true sources of terror in America.

The Council of Islamic Relations CAIR also cooks up hate crimes. After several Muslims were arrested for planning to kill as many Americans as possible at Fort Dix Robert Spencer wrote an article discussing why CAIR cooks up hate crimes. He wrote:

if CAIR succeeds in its attempt to portray Muslims in America as innocent victims of Islamophobic persecution, they will have deflected attention away from the question of whether or not the Fort Dix Six and other jihadists learned to hate and betray America in American mosques. Thus American mosques, seen as victims rather than as possibly abettors of seditious activity, wont face any scrutiny over what they are doing, and not doing, to halt the spread of the jihadist ideology of Islamic supremacism among Muslims in AmericaImportant for the victimhood game: winners receive torrents of money, favorable media coverage, and moral authority that must never be questioned.

    Ironically it is the Muslims who are a fountain of hate in the United States.  One example is the behavior of Muslims on the University of San Francisco campus.

    Abdul Rahman Al-Habib of the Saudi daily Al-Watan in the English-language Arab News wrote that (wnd.com 4/15/2006):

The "difficult path" of hard research and analysis of the problems in Arab society is left aside in exchange for giving readers "some hackneyed diatribe against America."

"The problem here is a lack of understanding about the process of criticism," he said. "Our society is one that lacks dialogue and rejects the mere concept of criticism. There is a severe lack of understanding behind criticism as an application. In our society, criticism is a synonym for defamation."

Al-Habib said that when "something tragic happens, such as an act of terrorism against the West that is committed by one of our children, our 'critics' end up falling back into the trap of painting complex conspiracy theories that depict us as the victims."

When it comes to assessing why Arabs and Muslims are behind in development, the answer always is "because of the West and its agents."

" [W]hen we ask ourselves why the West is developed and advanced, the answer is always satisfactory: because the West stole the sciences of our ancestors and they are still plundering us to advance themselves!

"Can you find prettier, more populist answers than this?" 
 

     It would be nice if that had appeared in Arabic as well.  A former Kuwaiti oil minister, Ali Baghli wrote in the Kuwaiti daily Al-Seyassah, March 30:

"I think if the U.S. did not exist some of us would have invented it. It is because we are used to hanging all our problems and catastrophes on America. We add Israel to America."

     Nonie Darwish (frontpagemag.com 10/5/04)  wrote about the need to blame in Arab countries as follows:

To admit ones flaws and mistakes, to correct and repent, challenges a person of any nationality. In Muslim culture, however, it is inconceivable. To acknowledge one's shortcomings before first blaming others would bring deep shame and dishonor not only to the individual but to his or her entire family. Those who admit fault, even unintentional guilt, are regarded as foolish. If the mistake is a cultural taboo, one's reputation may be scarred for life and the perpetrator might end up brutally punished.

In another article in frontpagemag (Factories of Terror Under Attack, 9/7/05) Nonie Darwish wrote about how Egyptian youth blame the United States and Israel for all their trouble.  She wrote:

In 2001, right before 9/11, I interviewed a large group of Muslim youths in Cairo. Many of them were unemployed, extremely angry and confused. Several of them could not get married because of severe shortages in apartments; a consequence of the extreme rent control of the Egyptian governments  policies since 1960. They blamed the US and Israel for all their problems. It was obvious they were all the product of years of indoctrination. However, amidst all the confusion, hate and anger, I sensed a need by these young Muslims for an escape.  Several of them later asked me How can we get a visa to the USA.

These kids were an example of the confused and angry Muslim youth all over the Middle East. Those among that youth who immigrate to the West find themselves alienated from American society. Some become terrorist sympathizers or, even worse, easy prey to radical mosques installed in the US by the same governments they left behind. Muslim and Arab-Americans cannot escape the culture of terror that follows them all the way to America.

Nonie gave a speech at the Heritage Foundation which can be viewed online in which she said:

Arab media suppresses information that is damaging to Arab and Muslim leaders. And I saw unemployment a lot of unempolyment high inflation widespread corruption and mismanagement but none of this mattered. All you saw on Egyptian media was Israel and America bashing and blaming the West for all their problems. There was even garbage around the Nile valley just garbage pollution and none of this mattered to the media. All they cared is blame the outside world for our internal problems

It is a shame that we have such poverty in the Middle East and blame the West Bank and Gaza poverty on Israel when the Arab world is drowning in money financing terrorism. Let them go and finance improving the lives of the Arabs in the West bank and Gaza and the poor people in Egypt and Syria and Jordan and Iraq. What a shame.

  One of the major attempts to shift blame by the Arab world has been for the attacks of 9/11. A film of these efforts was created by MEMRI and can be viewed by clicking here.  Ahmadinejad suggested that 9/11 was a U.S. Plot to Save Zionism.  Zionism, according to Ahmadinejad is responsible for both World Wars.  In 2010 Ahmadinejad alleged that the United States had orchestrated the 2001 attacks on the World Trade Center and the Pentagon, which killed almost 3,000 people, to create a pretext for the invasions of Afghanistan and Iraq.  In 2011 after a U.S. seal team killed Bin Ladin he said that "Instead of assigning a fact-finding team (to investigate the 9/11 attacks), they killed the main perpetrator and threw his body into the sea.

    Ahmadinejad's attempts to blame the U.S. has antagonized Al Qaeda which wants credit for the attacks.  ABC reported that:

"The terror group al Qaeda has found itself curiously in agreement with the 'Great Satan' -- which it calls the U.S. -- in issuing a stern message to Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad: stop spreading 9/11 conspiracy theories. In the latest issue of the al Qaeda English-language magazine 'Inspire', an author appears to take offense to the 'ridiculous' theory repeatedly spread by Ahmadinejad that the 9/11 terror attacks were actually carried out by the U.S. government in order to provide a pretext to invade the Middle East. 'The Iranian government has professed on the tongue of its president Ahmadinejad that it does not believe that al Qaeda was behind 9/11 but rather, the U.S. government,' an article reads. 'So we may ask the question: why would Iran ascribe to such a ridiculous belief that stands in the face of all logic and evidence?' Though Iran was the first of the two to use the 'Great Satan' as a synonym for the U.S., the author claims that Iran sees itself as a rival for al Qaeda when it comes to anti-Americanism and was jealous of the 9/11 attacks."

   Pakistani TV blamed Hindu Zionists for the attack by Pakistani based Islamic terrorists on Mumbai in November 2008.  Youtube has a video suggesting the Mossad was behind the attack on the Chabad house.  Kanchan Gupta is the associate editor of the Pioneer, of New Delhi, India.  He posted the an article on his web site called India's Denial about reactions to the Mumbai massacre.  Here are some excerpts:

Even before Mumbai's first night of horror wass over, by early morning of November 27 Islamist websites were flush with claims that the multiple attacks had been planned and executed by Hindus, Jews and Christians to malign Muslims.  The Muslim Brotherhood's website, www.ikhwanweb.com, had an article on its home page, allegedly written by a certain 'Amaresh Misra' which said, "It is clear that Mossad is involved in the whole affair.  An entire city has been attacked by Mossad and probably units of mercenaries.."

Later that day, the website posted a message from 'FM Shah' in response to the article.  According to the 'Lion of Khyber' the fidayeen raid on Mumbai had been "made and produced in India with the help of CIA/Mossad in order to make Pakistan the scapegoat."

    A few months later a dozen masked terrorists killed seven policemen and wounded six players of the Sri Lanka National Cricket Team in Lahore Pakistan.  Stephen Brown wrote:

many Pakistani pundits were quick to appear on television and claim their country was a victim of an Indian conspiracy.

The blame-India game did not stop there. Pakistans elite class, which should know better, also helped promote the theory of Indian culpability. A former Pakistani federal minister for shipping, for example, accused India of complicity. Hamid Gul, Pakistans former intelligence chief, added to the conspiracy theory: Its all too obvious that it is the handiwork of the Indian intelligence...

One reason proffered for this deep denial is that the truth is too difficult to face. One observer draws a comparison with parents who are told their child is a drug dealer maintaining It is easiest to find all sorts of excuses not to believe it.

This mindset was in evidence after the Mumbai terrorist attack. Initially, Pakistan also blamed India for that massacre, in which 170 people died. Pakistans prime minister even fired President Zardaris national security advisor, Mahmood Ali Durrani, for admitting the surviving terrorist attacker was Pakistani.

But there is another, more sinister reason behind this blame-India tactic that only serves to damage relations between the two South Asian countries.

The truth is that many members of Pakistans military and civil establishment are infused with a jihadist mindset. Blaming India for terrorist attacks allows these establishment members to escape taking action against the Taliban and other Islamist terrorist groups who perpetrate such atrocities.

    I would add to that, that what could be more effective jihad tactic than not only committing a terrorist attack against the infidel but also inciting more hatred against the infidel by blaming him for the terrorist attack?  Not only is this an effective tactic but it diverts any anger at whatever role one played oneself away from oneself.

    Irans Al-Alam TV broadcast an interview with Jordanian MP Dr. Adnan Hasouna on October 28, in which he claimed that the Mossad is responsible for attacks in Iraq (Muslim Conspiracy Theories, FrontpageMag, 12/30/04):

The Israeli Mossad, the Jewish Mossad, and others strive to distort the image of Islam by striking the National Guard soldiers and civilians. 

    Evidence exists that Iran is behind some of these attacks. Mohamed Selim El-Awwa, a prominent Egyptian Islamist and Secretary-General of the International Association of Muslim Scholars (IAMS), explained that Muslims would not decapitate a hostage and that the Iraqi resistance had been infiltrated by "Zionist and international intelligence services."  In the Saudi daily Arab News on September 7^th, Hassan Tahsin wrote that the Mossad

has many operation centers both in Baghdad and in other major cities in Iraq; their job is to organize terrorist activities to guarantee that Iraq remains unstable "

      After Ahmadinejad supposedly won the election against Mir Hussein Moussavi Mr. Moussavi said the elections were rigged.  A lot of the people who voted for Moussavi agreed and rioted.  Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, Irans top Muslim leader, accused dirty Zionists" and Zionist media for being behind charges that the results of the election were rigged.

   According to the Palestinian Media Watch Bulletin, a poem appearing on the opinion page of  Al-Hayat Al-Jadida (January 16, 2006) gives insight into the Palestinian Authority worldview. The blaming of Arab Muslims for Islamic terrorism, from Bin Laden to Al-Zarqawi in Iraq, is described as a fantasy invented by "occupation forces" to "justify war and disasters."   Itamar Marcus and Barbara Crook wrote:

The poet's questioning the existence of Bin Laden is consistent with a Palestinian denial of Arab Muslim responsibility for the World Trade Center Attacks. A 2003 public opinion poll revealed that only 46% of Palestinians believed that Bin Laden was responsible for the attacks against the US on September 11, 2001. Twenty-six per cent felt that Israel was behind the attacks.

This refusal to acknowledge Muslim responsibility for Islamic terror is not unique to Palestinian society. A popular music video from Egypt, which you can view by clicking here, shows an animated cartoon image of Ariel Sharon pushing the button that sent the terrorists' planes crashing into the World Trade Center. This music video is exceedingly popular throughout the Arab world, and appears regularly on Arab satellite TV.

Today's poem denies the existence of Arab-Muslim terror, and claims it is the West's justification for its wars against Arabs.

    After it was determined by U.N. Chief Investigator Detlev Mehlis that Syria was behind the murder of Rafik Hariri in Lebanon, the Syrians blamed the Jews. (Syrian Blame Game, Frontpage Magazine.com 11/9/05)

    15 of the 19 hijackers on Sept 11th were Saudi.  Saudi "charitable donations" have been traced to terrorists.  In response to growing American anger about this Saudi Interior Minister Prince Naif Ibn Abd Al-Aziz - blamed who else, the Jews.  He said: (New York Post 12/4/02 quoting  Nov. 29 interview by Kuwait's Al Siyasa newspaper.)

Who committed the events of Sept. 11? . . . I think they [the Zionists] are behind these events.  It is impossible that 19 youths, including 15 Saudis, carried out the operation of Sept. 11.

Naif said, adding that the "Zionist-controlled media" in the United States is manipulating the terror war to create a backlash against Muslims.

   Time Magazine Jan 03 reported that the Saudis are pouring money into anti-Israel radio ads in the United States.  This may be part of an effort to shift blame away from themselves.

   Unfortunately the Islamic effort to shift blame to Israel has been alarmingly successful.  Cindy Adams (New York Post 6/17/04) in a discussion with the Chief Rabbi of Israel, broached the issue that many Americans blame his people for 9/11 and thus the war.  She wrote:

Said Yona Metzger, the Chief Rabbi of Israel:

Go back to another war.  The Nazis. Hitler.  A madman.  What was it then?  The Jews.  The world believed then they were suffering only because of the Jews.  That is the fundamental mistake today.  Again we are dealing with a maniac.  But this is not our people.   It is your people.  Bin Laden wants to dominate America. 

America must wake up and smell the coffee.   This man wants to bring your country down...  Al Qaeda wants to change the mind of America.  Not that it should be Democrat.  That it should be Muslim!

    Lebanese Prime Minister Rafiq Hariri was assassinated by a car bomb on 12/15/05.  The Bush administration believes that Syria was behind the assassination.  Syria reacted by blaming Israel.   Aaron Klein wrote an article in wnd.com (Syria blames Israel for Assassination 12/16/05)

the official Damascus press, considered a mouthpiece for Syrian President Bashar Assad's regime, condemned the murder as an "odious crime," and blamed Israel for seeking to create instability in Lebanon with the killing of Hariri...

But Hariri, a billionaire businessman who resigned from his government post last year and had recently joined calls by opposition leaders for Syrian troops to vacate Lebanon in the run-up to a general election in May, was close to many in the Israel government. Hariri was reportedly working behind the scenes the past few months to push for official Lebanese recognition of the Jewish state, and was involved in multiple business ventures with Israeli and Jewish businessmen.

    The Palestinian Authority has diverted funds donated by Europe, the United States and Arab countries to corrupt officials including Yassir Arafat.  In 1992 British Intelligence assessed Arafats personal money accounts at $8 to $10 Billion U.S. dollars plus $1 to $2 Billion per year interest income and profit on money-laundering businesses. ("Dont Underrate Arafats Bank Account" by Rachel Ehrenfeld WALL ST. JOURNAL EUROPE December 2, 1992)  Today the accumulation from Arafat's  lucrative interest income plus all he has skimmed from the donor nations (Arab, European and American) could exceed $15 to $20 billion dollars. As a result of the ongoing diversion of donations many Arab countries have stopped donating funds to the Palestinian Authority.  One motive Arafat may have to create paranoia toward Israel may be to divert the hostility of the Arabs under his administration from the corruption of his administration.

   In a rare instance the 2000 Arab Human Development Report describes corruption, poverty, and illiteracy in 22 Arab countries.  Unfortunately it then blamed it all on Israel!

    Nonie Darish in an article in frontpagemag.com (What a Muslim Learned on Yom Kippur 10/5/04) wrote:

Despite its wealth from oil, the Arab world is among the poorest societies on Earth. The once-great Nile Valley lies amid pollution and garbage.  With rampant unemployment and low average incomes, poor citizens must bribe government officials to survive. And yet, Arab media correspondents ignore these difficult problems, focusing instead on the destruction of Israel. In this manner, they shift the blame for societal problems to an outside force. 

At a time when most religions struggle to explain evil in the world, radical Islam has found the answer: without hesitation, they say it is the Jews. In Friday sermons in mosques around the globe, this theme repeats itself every week. In the wake of the Beslan tragedy, when Muslim terrorists attacked Russian schoolchildren, some Arabs speculated about a Jewish conspiracy. After writing in support of Israel, I personally have been accusing of participating in such a conspiracy. Israel has become the useful enemy that Arabs blame for everything.

    Palestinian terrorists store many of their explosives in residential areas.  This has led to accidental explosions and the death of Arab civilians.  According to a report by Arutz 7 on May 2, 2001, PA Gaza Police Chief Razi Jabali diverted blame to Israel by claiming that the wave of  explosions in the prior weeks within PA-areas were due to explosives included inside Israeli paints.   Jabali, who has been wanted by Israel since mid-1997 for planning terror-attacks against Israeli targets, said that after the paints are stored for a certain amount of time and are then mixed with other materials, they "become very dangerous and can lead to explosion and injury."  These charges have been laboratory-proven, Jabali maintains, adding that all Palestinian security agencies are now engaged in tracking down the materials and removing them from Palestinian stores.

   The Arabs in order to defend Islam against accusations of it being a terrorist faith claim that Judaism is a terrorist faith.   Hussam Wahba, a columnist for the religious Egyptian weekly magazine 'Aqidati, wrote the following accusations in an article (Al-Gomhuriya (Egypt), August 10, 2004):

On the Main Entrance to the Knesset it is Inscribed : 'Compassion Toward a Non-Jew is Forbidden' " The Jews forgot that their primary constitution, on which they rely, is full of intellectual religious terrorism against all other nations...   Whoever visits the Israeli parliament known as 'The Knesset' will notice at the main entrance a sentence written on the wall saying: 'Compassion towards a non-Jew is forbidden, if you see him fall into a river or face danger, you are prohibited from saving him because all the nations are enemies of the Jews and when a non-Jew falls into a ditch, the Jew should close the ditch on him with a big boulder, until he dies, so that the enemies will lose one person and the Jews will be able to preserve their dream of the Promised Land, the Greater Israel!' "This sentence is taken from the Jewish Talmud which is holier that the Torah itself...

I suppose Hussam realizes that most of his readers will never visit the Knesset or read the Talmud.   Dr. Muhammad Abdalla Al-Sharqawi says in his book 'The Talmudic Scandals' wrote that the Talmud says:

'Murdering a non-Jew whenever possible is an obligation. A Jew is a sinner if he can murder non-Jews but does not do so. And a Jewish priest who blesses a person [Jew] who brings evidence that he murdered one or more non-Jews is a blessed priest.  Murdering non-Jews pleases God, because the flesh of non-Jews is the flesh of donkeys and their sperm is the sperm of animals.'   "The Talmud also says 'Kill anyone who is not Jewish even if he is pious. The Jews are prohibited from saving from death any member of the other nations, or rescue him from a ditch in which he fell, because that would mean saving an idolater, even though he is pious.'   "Also, the Talmud says that 'it is righteous for a Jew to kill a non-Jew with his own hands, because whoever kills a non-Jew is offering a sacrifice to God' " Then, God will reward any Jew who contributed to the conflict between the two nations with eternal life in Paradise " The Talmud did not only deal with killing non-Jews, but permitted the violation of their honor [i.e. women] and property, when it says: 'The Jew is not in the wrong if he rapes a non-Jewish woman, because non-Jewish women are permitted'

It's interesting to note that this description of the Talmud fits the Koran a lot better than the Talmud.  The Koran states that Muslims will achieve eternal life in Paradise if they kill the infidel.  The Koran says Muslims can enslave women of countries they have conquered in battle and make them into concubines which means they can rape them for the rest of their lives.

Dr. Jama al-Husseini Abu Farha, instructor in theology at the University of Suez , points out that Jews are 'blood suckers' according to the Talmudic dictates, which urge them to murder and draw the blood of Muslims in particular, and Christians even more so, and to use this blood in religious Israeli rituals.

"Therefore, these rituals that were mentioned in the Talmud and which reflect the truth about the present Jewish terrorist way of thinking are certainly implemented from time to time, while they do not hesitate to distort the image of Islam and describe it as a terrorist faith."

In order to shift blame for Muslim attacks on French synagogues, Al Hayat Al Jadida editor Hafez Barghouti told PA TV in 2004 that secret Zionist gangs in France were blowing up synagogues to force French Jews to emigrate to Israel.

Ezra HaLevi wrote in Israel National News about how Arabs tried to shift blame for a Muslim attack on a Jewish woman. (4/29/2007):

A young Jewish woman was brutalized by two Muslim Arabs in France Thursday.

Audrey Brachelle, 22, was attacked in the French city of Marseilles Thursday evening. The attack began as she walked back from her job as an accountant at a textile factory toward the metro station in the La Rose neighborhood of the city, which is home to many Jews.

Two Arab men followed her and attempted to steal her cell phone. After they grabbed it, the attackers noticed the Jewish ornament on the womans necklace, at which point she says they realized she was Jewish and began focusing on brutalizing her rather than stealing her phone.

The men then punched her in the face, sliced her dress with a knife and carved at least one Nazi swastika into her chest. They also cut off a clump of her hair

Local Marseilles Arabs have been quoted in the left-wing press in France and elsewhere positing that the attack was staged in order to score votes for Sarkozy

The Arabs also shift blame for their attacks on other Arabs to Israel. In 2007 Hamas has launched attacks on Fatah and blamed Israel for it. (frontpagemag.com 5/2007). Cameron Brown and Asaf Romirowsky wrote that:

In the early morning of May 15 [2007], Hamas used mortars, missiles and machine guns to attack a Presidential Guard contingent belonging to Fatah that was stationed near the Karni border crossing with Israel. Hamas then hit a jeep carrying Fatah reinforcements, and ensured their targets were dead by shooting them in the head at close range.

When the shooting was over, 10 Fatah members were dead, with a similar number wounded.

Suddenly aware that their unprovoked massacre may have gone too far, Hamas claimed it was Israel who had actually killed the Fatah people and threatened any journalist who dared report otherwise.

Then, in a truly perverse twist, Hamas launched more than 20 rockets at the Israeli town of Sderot "to take revenge" for the massacre they themselves had committed.

After the Palestinian Arabs converted the Synagogues of Gush Katif into launching pads against Israel Abu Abir, spokesman for the Popular Resistance Committees terrorist organization told Aaron Klein, a reporter for WorldnetDaily that (wnd 2/27/07):

"The liberated lands of the destroyed ugly and Nazi settlements [Gush Katif] is our property, and we have the right to do whatever we feel is suitable for the struggle against the occupation and for the general interest of the Palestinian people The Zionists left these so called synagogues in order to make that one day media outlets like WorldNetDaily would raise the pathetic and rude argument about what we have done to the poor Zionists holy places. (Israel) left the synagogues behind so the world would see the Palestinians destroying them.

Notice the use of the term Nazi to describe Jewish settlements when the Arabs who destroyed the synagogues and turned them into launching pads of rockets against Israeli civilians are the true Nazis. Notice how blame is being shifted to the Zionists who left the synagogues in Gush Katif for their destruction.

     Aaron Klein also wrote how Abu Abir described the "great joy" of looting and burning the Jewish synagogues in Gaza and how he said that (The Late Great State of Israel):

We are proud to turn these lands, especially these parts that were for a long time the symbol of occupation and injustice, like the synagogue, into a military base and source of fire against the Zionists and the Zionist entity.

    Many Israelis blamed the expellees of Gush Katif and the settlers for the terrorism that is launched by Arabs against Israel to the point of hating them.  A video of one of the people expelled from Gush Katif discussing this can be seen here.   A similar creation of paranoia campaign was launched against the Jews living in Judea and Samaria in order to get support from the rest of Israel's population for their expulsion.  (worldnetdaily 10/1/2008)

    Pakistan tried to shift blame for the Mumbai massacres of 2008 to nonstate actors.  The Indians caught one of the terrorists Ajmal Ameer Kasav.  He said he had undergone months of commando-style training in a Islamist militant camp in Pakistan, two senior officials involved in the investigation said.

The training was organised by the Lashkar-e-Taiba militant group, and conducted by a former member of the Pakistani army, a police officer close to the interrogation said. (France 24 Dec 1 2008)

India gave Pakistan specific evidence about who was behind the attack, including intercepted satellite telephone conversations and an account given by the lone surviving gunman, Ajmal Amir Kasav. 
The United States and Britain have joined India in blaming Lashkar-e-Taiba for the Mumbai attacks.

Pakistan denied any links to the 60-hour assault blaming "non-state actors."  The Pakistani government said it had been given no firm evidence of Pakistani involvement.

"Pakistan's response so far has demonstrated their earlier tendency to resort to a policy of denial and to seek to deflect and shift the blame and responsibility," India Foreign Minister Pranab Mukherjee said. (Pakistan Shifting Blame over Mumbai,  India Says, Reuters 12/22/2008)

    I had a conversation with a man who was driving my taxi in New York  in December 2008 who said he was from Pakistan.  He said that India perpetrated the Mumbai attacks and then blamed Pakistan for them.  He said Bal Thackeray and someone named Avinda? were bad Indian people who perpetrated the attacks.

   The Observer, a British newspaper conducted an independent investigation and found out that Ajmal Kasav's parents' names were on the electoral rolls of Faridkot, the village where he said he came from.  Villagers said they new Ajmal.

A villager, who was not named for sake of his protection, said the hamlet was an active recruiting ground for the banned militant group Lashkar-e-Taiba that India has named as being among the organisation's responsible for the Mumbai attacks.

"We know that boy (caught in Mumbai) is from Faridkot," the villager told an Observer reporter in Faridkot. "We knew from the first night (of the attack). They brainwash our youth about jihad, there are people who do it in this village. It is so wrong," he added.

One villager told the Observer: "We've all known from the first day (of the Mumbai attack) that it was him, Ajmal Amir Kasab. His mother started crying when she saw his picture on the television."

Villagers said his parents had been mysteriously spirited away earlier in the week.

"Ajmal used to go to Lahore for work, as a labourer," the villager, who feared being named, told the daily. "He's been away for maybe four years. When he came back once a year, he would say things like, 'We are going to free Kashmir.'"

Shown a picture of Kasav, the villager confirmed he was a Faridkot resident who had last visited the village a couple of months ago during the Eid festival, the report said.

     Obamacare, or the Affordable Care Act has made previously affordable care unaffordable for many Americans.  It has been a public relations disaster for the Democrats.  The response of Democrats has been to say that the stories of Americans losing their health insurance or not being able to pay for them are phony and to attack the Koch Brothers who have contributed large sums to the Republican party.  Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid went so far as to accuse the Koch Brothers of endangering the Ukraine.

The Chinese shift blame

    Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome or SARS was underreported by the Chinese giving the World Health Organization less time to develop a vaccine against it.   Some virologists implicate the farming practices common in the southern provinces of China to the creation of SARS.  Chinese farmers raise hens, ducks, pigs and fish in one integrated system. They use the droppings and leftover food from the pigs to feed the fowl. The fowl droppings, in turn, help fertilize the fish ponds. This opens the door for viruses to mutate and jump species.  "The most likely scenario is that [SARS] has been circulating in another species in southern China, and human beings came in contact with it this past autumn, perhaps in an agricultural setting," said Dr. Stephen Morse, author of "Emerging Viruses." "It is interesting that this part of Asia is the same geographic area from which most known influenza pandemics have arisen."

   The Chinese would much rather shift the blame to the United States then admit their culpability.  According to a Chinese controlled, Hong Kong newspaper, Wenweipo, the original outbreak of SARS was in the United States.  A Taiwan News editorial debunked the story and pointed out that Wenweipo is a well known mouthpiece for Beijing among China watchers and its editorials and articles frequently serve as "trial balloons" for Beijing policy-makers. It concluded that  the Wenweipo's "excavation and creative remix of a news story more than a year old" is an attempt by the Chinese Communist Party to deflect criticism for its handling of the epidemic. (Worldnetdaily 5/9/03)

    In China product faking is common place.  In one case they marked a batch of oranges as "product of Israel".  Those oranges wound up in Iran.  The belief that Israeli oranges had been imported into the country led to outrage.  A government official muttered darkly about a "Citrus plot" by the Israelis to undermine the Islamic regime by bombarding it with infidel Israeli fruit.  Ironically , given the practices of Chinese farmers, one can't help but wonder if Iran would be better off with Israeli fruit than Chinese fruit.

Yu Huafeng, the general manager of China's Southern Metropolitan Daily newspaper, was recently sentenced to 12 years in prison. Li Minying, a former editor in chief, was sentenced to 11 years. Cheng Yizhong, the paper's top editor, is under arrest and has been charged with embezzlement.  According to the New York Times (4/15/04)

Although the official charge was embezzlement of company bonuses, most observers say the most immediate apparent cause for Southern Metropolitan Daily's legal troubles was its reporting in December of a suspected re-emergence of the SARS virus, which caused a deadly epidemic a year earlier.

In this case China is creating paranoia toward the newspaper as part of an effort to keep secret from tourists the reemergence of the SARS virus in China.

XIIIa Creation of Paranoia to Shift Blame to Protect Self Image

This is the excellent foppery of the world,
that when we are sick in fortune, often the surfeits
of our own behavior, we make guilty of our disasters
the sun, the moon, and stars; as if we were
villains on necessity; fools by heavenly compulsion;
knaves, thieves, and treachers by spherical
predominance; drunkards, liars, and adulterers by
an enforced obedience of planetary influence; and
all that we are evil in, by a divine thrusting on.
-Edgar in King Lear by Shakespeare

     Whites are commonly derided as colonialists who occupied Africa.  What is seldom discussed is the good Whites have done for Africa.  Albert Shweitzer is an example of someone who went to Africa to treat diseases at a time when going there was a risky proposition.  Actually it still is.  Students from Chapman University in Orange County, California, vandalized Schweitzers statue saying he was guilty of Racism, Ethnocentrism and White Savior Complex.   No matter what a white man does he is an evil racist according to their delusional view.  If he helps blacks he is racist that too is proof of racism.  When one constructs a schema in which all evidence proves one's beliefs that is a sign of delusional thinking. 

It appears to have been the Nigerian-American novelist Teju Cole, who coined the widely used term "white-savior industrial complex" in 2012, after seeing the Kony 2012 viral video produced by the American charity Invisible Children.

Kony 2012 was meant to raise awareness about the atrocities of the Ugandan warlord Joseph Kony and his Lord's Resistance Army. 

Joseph Kony

Notice how the guilt here is of a black man and his black army yet blame is being shifted to the white man who is trying to help.

Melvin Lee in an article titled The Fallacy of Grievance-Based Terrorism wrote:

Both the United States and Jews have become the focus of Islamists' irrational enmity as Islamist thinkers and Arab demagogues deflect any internal responsibility for Muslim countries' woes. This was a common theme both of Sayyid Qutb, the leading Muslim Brotherhood ideologue and, later, Al-Qaeda founder Osama bin Laden.[30] In Knowing the Enemy, Mary Habeck, a professor of military history at Johns Hopkins University's School of Advanced International Studies, documents how Qutb and bin Laden spread a message that the decline of majority Muslim polities is not the result of flaws within Islam itself but is instead the deliberate effort of the United States and the Jews.[31] Today Pakistani madrasas (Islamic schools) alone spin out more than one million graduates per year steeped in jihadi ideology.[32]

The Islamic Republic of Iran Broadcasting, attributed all tensions between Muslims and Westerners to a Zionist conspiracy. During the Rushdie affair, the Iranian official statement breaking diplomatic ties with the UK blamed the publication of the book on the Agents of International Zionism.  The left wing Center for American Progress issued a report that also blames the negative view that Americans have of Islam on a handful of Jews. Irans PressTV picked up the report focusing on the individual names. Frank Gaffney, David Horowitz, David Yerushalmi, Daniel Pipes, Robert Spencer, Steve Emerson and many others are given their own paragraph by the press agency of a regime where blaspheming against Islam is a crime that leads to imprisonment or even death....

We know exactely who they are, wrote Muslim Waffen SS. Still is a blessing until some one eliminate them, wrote another commenter.

 

XIIIb Creation of Paranoia for Unknown Reasons

    Jug Burkett and Glenna Whitley in their book "Stolen Valor", wrote that over 1700 individuals including some of the most prominent examples of the Vietnam veterans as dysfunctional loser had fabricated their war stories.   Many had never even been in the service  Others had been, but had never been in Vietnam.(Slandering a Generation New York Post 2/12/04)  Many stories of atrocities were fabricated  Perhaps some of them were trying to get attention and enjoyed shocking people. perhaps they wanted to be treated as heros. 

Sgt. Leon Peters of the 4/64 Scout Platoon said that in Faluja, Iraq: (City of Deadly Rumor, Jonathan Foreman, New York Post 5/7/04)

The biggest rumor going down the street is that the U.S. soldiers have devices with X-ray vision.

   One chief complaint of the already hostile population in Falluja was that U.S. troops were using their night-vision goggles to look beneath the clothes of the town's womenfolk.

Perhaps this rumor started because of generalized paranoia toward Americans.

   On January 30, 2003, Nelson Mandela told an International Women's Forum in Johannesburg the following:

One power (the US) with a president (Bush) who has no foresight and cannot think properly, is now wanting to plunge the world into a holocaust ... Why is the United States behaving so arrogantly? All that (Bush) wants is Iraqi oil ... Is it because the secretary-general of the United Nations is now a black man? They never did that when secretary-generals were white ... If there is a country that has committed unspeakable atrocities in the world, it is the United States of America. They don't care for human beings.

    The Jews are accused of manipulating the United States into going to war with Iraq.  Such an accusation was even made on Time Magazine's web site.  Vasko Kohlmeyer pointed out the irony of this in an article in Frontpage Magazine.  He wrote:

Most American Jews oppose this war. In 2005 the Annual Survey of Jewish Public opinion found that 70 percent of Jews in America disapproved of the Iraq war. Two years later a Gallup poll found that 77 percent believed the war was a mistake. As a point of comparison, only 52 percent of the American public held this belief at the time.

Thousands of anti-war demonstrators took to the streets across South Africa on February15 ("Viva Osama" they chant in South Africa, www.yourdotcomforafrica.com 2/16/03) to exercise their relatively new democratic right to publicly protest. In this case, they protested against the looming war in Iraq. Reports from the region say that South African protestors dressed up as suicide bombers ready to go to Iraq and work as a human shields against American attacks, chanted "Viva Osama," "Down with the US," and "Peace, no war." They also burned American flags, called Americans imperialists, and lectured Americans that they are not God.

XV Islamic Tolerance of Jews:

   One objection I heard to the statement in my article regarding intolerance toward Jews being written in the Koran is that there have been tolerant periods towards Jews who lived in Arab lands.  This may be because Muhammed discovered that the nonbelievers were more useful as a live source of income than as dead infidels.  If non-Moslems (called Dhimmi) paid special taxes, the jizya, or poll tax, and kharaj, or land tax they were offered "protection" by the rulers and the right to practice their religion.  Even with this protection however, the Dhimmi were second class citizens and victims of humiliation by the Muslims.  In spite of these taxes and their lower class status some Jews rose high in trades of finance, medicine, and diplomacy.  Muslims felt dealing with unbelievers from outside the regime left them tainted and impure, so dhimmis from within the Empire filled commercial, diplomatic, and medical vocations.  An old Arab saying stated the Jew rises to greatness with either the medicine bottle or the moneybag in his hand.  Both modes of employment had specific advantages.  As doctors, dhimmi physicians with great skill earned the gratefulness and support of many noble Muslims.  Many Muslim, Jewish, and Christian physicians exchanged knowledge and worked together in their profession, some even accepting interfaith apprentices.  Muslims felt handling money and many precious metals held danger to their immortality. Dhimmi bankers often aided rulers in need of ready cash and used these dependencies to gain court favor and power.  However, when the Jews became too powerful the Moslems often reacted violently.  In 1066, for example hundreds of Jews were killed in progroms by Muslims intent upon putting the Dhimmi where they belonged.  For more on this subject see Jewish Life Under Early Islam by Elizabeth Broughton and The Dhimmi by Bat Yeor.

When the Jews were not Dhimmi there was and is zero tolerance for them.  A current Egyptian textbook of "Arab Islamic History" (See Oslo Terror and Weapons of Mass Destruction by Louis Rene Beres Freeman Center Broadcast Feb 19, 02), informs new teachers as follows:

The Jews are always the same, every time and everywhere. They will not live save in darkness. They contrive their evils clandestinely.  They fight only when they are hidden, because they are cowards....The Prophet enlightened us about the right way to treat them, and succeeded finally in crushing the plots they had planned. We, today, must follow this way and purify Palestine from their filth.

  In 2001, the Talmud, Judaism's holy book of law, was vilified on Al-Akhbar's website (Al-Akhbar is an Egyptian newspaper) where Al-Kurdi was quoted as saying:

People around the world learned that the insane myths of the Talmud are being implemented against the non-Jews in the world.  I called on the [Cairo] summit to take action so that the day won't come when big bottles will be filled with Arab blood.

   The following is a paragraph from an article in the Egyptian newspaper Al Ahram that appeared in the week of (1/27-2/02/02):

The first thing we have to make clear is that no distinction can be made between the Jew and the Israeli....The Jew is a Jew, through the millennia...in spurning all moral values, devouring the living and drinking his blood for the sake of a few coins. The Jew, the Merchant of Venice, does not differ from the killers of the (Lebanon) camps. They are equal examples of human degradation. Let us put aside such distinctions (Jews and Israelis) and talk only about JEWS.

    This article is about the psychiatric pathology of paranoia as it infects society.  One would hope that Egyptian psychiatrists at least would recognize it and fight against it yet an Egyptian psychiatrist said on mainstream Egyptian-Saudi TV: (David Hornik, frontpagemagazine.com Israel's Latest Friendly Policeman 9/9/05)

. . . Israel will not exist forever. . . There are no Israeli civilians, they are all plunderers. . . . leave them one on one with the Palestinian people with the only weapon being dynamite, then you will see all Israelis leave, because there is not even one Israeli among them willing to don a belt of explosives. We will throw Israel into the sea, there is no middle ground. Coexistence is total nonsense.

     An Egyptian scientific publication wrote:

In the summer of 1949 cholera spread throughout Egypt, following the establishment of Israel in 1948. Egyptian documents indicate that the disease originated from Israel. Prior to the October War of 1973, they injected birds with germs and released them above Jordan, Palestine and the Suez Canal. Also, Jewish tourists infected with AIDS are traveling around Asian and African countries with the aim of spreading the disease. Israel continues to use germ warfare to destroy the Palestinian people on its occupied land.

    Sean Cannon, in an article titled Poisonous Propaganda (frontpagemag.com 3/2/2006) wrote:

On January 31, the state-owned Syrian daily, Al-Thawra, suggested that Israeli scientists at the Institute of Biological Research at Ness Ziona had developed the avian flu virus for use as a biological weapon against the Palestinians, releasing it in South East Asia to obscure the truth by shifting the world's attention to that distant region...and in order to make its transmission through birds seem like a natural phenomenon. Two weeks earlier, the chairman of the Palestinian Environment Authority, Dr. Youssef Abu Safiyah, had told a press conference in Gaza that Israel had buried 85,000 infected birds at Beit Furik outside Nablus in an attempt to spread the disease.

This is not the first time that Israel has been accused of waging war in this way. In December 1997, the PAs Committee for Consumer Protection claimed that Israel was knowingly importing chocolate contaminated with Mad Cow Disease into Palestinian cities while its representative to the UN Human Rights Commission alleged at a meeting in Geneva the previous March that Jerusalem had injected 300 Arab children with AIDS. Over the years Israel was also accused by Arafat or his flunkies of distributing contaminated food in an organized plan and conspiracy to poison and harm the Palestinian population; of attempting to completely destroy the genetic systems of Palestinian boys with hundreds of tons of toxic chewing gum; and, in May 2001, of starting a new genocide against the Palestinian people by poisoning them, using poisoned candy bags dropped down from airplanes. Even his wife Suha was co-opted into the cause; in November 1999, she told an audience which included Hillary Clinton, that Israel was causing cancer and other horrible diseases in Palestinian women and children through the intensive daily use of poison gas and the poisoning of 80% of the water supply with carcinogenic chemical materials.

   A July 17, 2009 Palestinian Media Watch Bulletin reported that:

Hamas has accused Israel of supplying "sexual stimulants" and other drugs to destroy Palestinian youth.

Hamas police spokesman Islam Shahwan said recently that Israeli intelligence officers are behind the smuggling of sexually stimulating drops and chewing gum into Gaza to "weaken and destroy" Palestinian youth and the social structure, according to Palestinian news agency FPNP ("Firas- Palestine News Press)

Shahwan claimed that a parent had complained to police that his daughter had chewed the Israeli gum and suffered "side effects." He said that Hamas police had subsequently arrested the distributors, confiscated the aphrodisiacs and confirmed that the drugs had been supplied by Israeli intelligence...

One PA official even accused Israel of distributing sports shoes that cause the wearer to become paralyzed, and perfumes that cause drug addiction.
 

     Israel National News reported that:

Palestinian Authority Arabs have made a variety of accusations against Israel over the years, from distributing bubble gum that corrupts Muslim youth to attacking with trained pigs. The latest rumor making the rounds among Arabs in Samaria is that Israelis are training snakes to attack innocent farmers, according to the Bethlehem-based Maan news, which is closely associated with the Fatah-led Palestinian Authority.

The rumor apparently began when a snake bit a woman outside a village adjacent to the Jewish city of Ariel. Local Arabs said that after the attack, the snake escaped toward Ariel. The snake's movement was taken as a sign that it had been released from Ariel by Israelis intent on harming Arabs.

The Maan report also accused Ariel residents of ruining farmland in the area by dumping waste onto Arab land.

PA villagers in the same area were the first to accuse Israelis of using trained pigs to attack Arab farmers. Several such accusations have been published by PA media. In addition, PA media has accused Israel of unleashing anti-Arab super rats in Jerusalem.

There is no scientific evidence indicating that rats or snakes can be trained as attack animals, or that either of the species can differentiate between Jews and Arabs.

    Daniel Pipes wrote that:

The Economist, with Al Jazeera hot on its heels, has dug up a new Israeli villain: traffic lights. This joins aphrodisiac bubble gum, poisonous candy, super rats, and stripper assassins in Israel's purported arsenal of tools to oppress Arabs. According to a March 6, 2010 article in the mainstream British news magazine, traffic lights in Jerusalem "flick green only briefly for cars from Palestinian districts while staying green for cars from Jewish settlements for minutes."

In the clip below an Iranian movie producer says that the Harry Potter books and movies are part of a Zionist plot.

Iran TV: Harry Potter Is A Zionist Hollywood Plot
 

Citing to a well-known HADITH (an Arabic term which refers to the oral tradition by means of which sayings or deeds attributed to the prophet Mohammed have been handed down to Muslim believers), King Sa'ud once informed a British visitor to his court:

Verily, the word of God teaches us, and we implicitly believe it, that for a Muslim to kill a Jew, or for him to be killed by a Jew, ensures him an immediate entry into Heaven and into the august presence of God Almighty.

   Itamar Marcus and Barbara Cook of Palestinian Media watch wrote a report called "Kill a Jew Go to Heaven" about the incitement by the Palestinian Authority.  A web page with their article and movie clips of the PA can be seen by clicking here.  The allegations by the Palestinian are as crazy as their imagination.  For example According to the PA papers (Palestinian Media Watch 7/24/2008), the Israelis have developed a rat  that is:

1. Immune to rat poison;
2. Aggressive and larger than usual;
3. Unafraid of cats and able to scare them away;
4. Highly fertile -- female rat gives birth to 140 babies a year, four times the normal average;
5. Highly selective -- Jewish residents of Jerusalem apparently are not affected by these rats.

and the Israelis release these rats in Arab neighborhoods.  Israel's goal, the libelous PA articles accuse, is "to turn the residents' life into a living hell, forcing them to leave."

The Palestinian Arabs also accuse the Israelis of poisoning Palestinian Prisoners ala Mengele

 
"The method employed by the Israeli Occupation in which they [are] instigating slow death ... doctors in Israeli prison clinics use the prisoners as guinea pigs for clinical drug testing under the pretense of 'treatment.'" [Al-Hayat Al-Jadida, July 6, 2008]
 
"Many of the male and female inmates received injections from needles they had not seen before, and which caused their hair and facial hair to fall out permanently ... others lost their sanity, or their mental condition is constantly deteriorating... and some are suffering from infertility." [Al-Hayat Al-Jadida, July 4, 2008]
 
"The doctors in these prison clinics are using the prisoners as guinea pigs for clinical testing of drugs and treatment-methods." [Al-Hayat Al-Jadida, July 3, 2008] 
 

In January 2009 , Egyptian cleric Zaghloul Al-Naggar called on waging war against the Jews, who are devils in human form.

   The Syrian red cross magazine had an article in which they wrote

• Israelis are the soldiers of the devil, successors of pirates, killers of prophets;
• They are the promoters of drugs, prostitution, homosexuality and crimes;
• The attempt of the band of evil to indulge their symbol (the Star of David)...is an attempt to force humanity to accept the symbol of evil and aggression among the emblems of welfare and safety.

   In my article I show how a lot of anti-semitism resulted in response to rejection by the Jews of other beliefs.   This may also be the cause of the persecution by Moslems of the Lebanese Christians since the 7th century.  Professor Walid Phares the author of, "Lebanese Christian Nationalism: The Rise and Fall of an Ethnic Resistance." believes, the "Christians of Lebanon were and are still targeted because of their Christian identity and their determination to remain Christian." 

   Paranoia creates a cycle in which hostility is generated which in turn generates further paranoia.  A diagram of this process in the Middle East can be seen by clicking here.   One tragic consequence of this cycle is that the paranoid get evidence supporting their paranoia.  The Palestinian Arabs by attacking Jews get attacked in return and this becomes further evidence that the Jews are evil.

   Individuals may create paranoia toward others in order to justify taking something from them.  During the Puerto Rican Day Parade in New York in June 2000 mobs assaulted women.  Roberto Camacho was accused of taking part in 15 of 30 attacks that took place that day.  When others tried to stop him, they say he shrugged them off by scowling, "F- that, they bitches anyway." He probably wanted to believe "they bitches" so he could justify sexually assaulting them.

  If an individual or group engaged in a criminal act faces punishment or retaliation often he will ignore his own responsibility and view those who try and stop them as evil.   They may even rationalize that they are heroes fighting against the wicked people who are trying to stop them.  When the United States House of Representatives passed a  package (June 29, 2000) that included $1.3 billion for Colombias war on drugs  Ivan Rios, a commander of the Revolutionary Armed Forces of Colombia, or FARC, said his group would arm coca farmers if needed to resist "U.S. aggression." "The peasants will defend themselves and we will stand by them," said the bearded rebel, a pistol and a large knife bulging from his olive-green fatigues. "It's going to be war out there."

  Creation of paranoia against another group or person is a way to motivate people to act against that group or person.  One example is Parental Alienation Syndrome in which one parent who wants sole custody of the child convinces the child to hate the other parent.  Another example of this was the paranoia created against a minister who posted the Bible verse, Leviticus 18:22, which reads, "Thou shalt not lie with mankind as with womankind; it is abomination." He was accused of being a hateful bigot and received death threats.  The story appeared in the New York Post.

    Creation of paranoia toward another group is the first step toward attempting to destroy or subjugate that group and so is the first step to war.   History is rife with creation of paranoia by groups toward each other.  Aaron Beck in his book Prisoners of Hate gives many examples of this.

  One motive for creating paranoia is to gain power.  A Totalitarian government, in order to  motivate the people it rules to conquer another country  is likely to indoctrinate them that the people in the other country are an evil threat.    In 1939 Hitler spread rumors that the Czechs were persecuting the German minority in the Sudetenland in order to inflame German anger against the Czechs and motivate them to conquer the Sudetenland. 

   Totalitarian religious groups often indoctrinate their followers that those who are not under the control of the religion are evil infidels and oppressors who must be destroyed in the name of God.  For examples see the "Negative Aspects of Religion Page". 

    Governments create paranoia toward a group in order to divert blame for failures of the government.  Egyptian author and publisher Amin Al-Mahdi wrote a  book, The Arab-Israeli Conflict:  the Crisis of Democracy and Peace in which he wrote

Our media directs the public opinion against Israel in order to divert it from the real problems... 

   The Palestinian Arabs start creating paranoia early.   One way the PA militarizes Palestinian children is through government-run television programming. They used to do so through their version of Sesame Street until the United States threatened to cut their funding.  (To see a clip of PLO Sesame Street click here.)   Norway nightly news showed clips compiled by Palestinian Media Watch about how money provided by the Norwegians and others is being used by the Palestinian Authority to incite children.  Of course that didnt stop the PA from inciting child hatred. In one fictitious music video that has run continually over the past few years on PA TV, a young Palestinian boy is shown heading to shahada, or martyrdom. Scenes of his death are accompanied by selections from his suicide letter, such as, How sweet is shahadabe joyous over my blood, and do not cry for me. Other PA music videos show children defacing Jewish symbols, such as the Menorah, and throwing stones at Israeli soldiers while chanting, You will not be saved, oh Zionist. Hamas TV brings, Farfur, the Palestinian Arab Mickey Mouse to the TV sets of Palestinian children who teaches them to annihilate the Jews and fight for Islamic supremacy (Hamas Steals Mickey Mouse Image to Teach Hate and Islamic Supremacy, 5/6/2007). They decided to end the show by having the Israelis beat Farfur to death. (movie) "Farfur was martyred while defending his land," said a teen hostess of the program. The mouse character had called the Israeli a "terrorist" and the hostess said he died at the hands of the "killers of children."

Farfur was replaced with a bee named Nahool, tells the hostess he is Farfurs cousin and that he wishes to continue the path of Farfur the path of martyrdom, the path of the Jihad warriors and in his name we shall take revenge upon the enemies of Allah, the murderers of the prophets (Jews)... (youtube)

  According to PMW bulletin (2/11/2008):

Farfur (Mickey Mouse) was beaten to death by an Israeli policeman
Nahul the Bee died when the Israeli "siege" of Gaza prevented him from reaching a hospital
Now there's a new character for Tomorrow's Pioneers, Assud the Rabbit
A girl asks the Hamas rabbit: "Why is your name 'Assud' ["lion"], since you are a rabbit?"
Assud, the rabbit: "A rabbit is a [term] for a bad person and coward. And I, Assud, will finish off the Jews and eat them. "
The girl hostess agrees: "Allah Willing!"

To see this on youtube click here.  In July of 2014 cartoons became reality and a homicidal Hamas chicken was killed in an Israeli air strike.

On Aug 27 Sheikh Muhammad Al-Munajid told viewers of a religious affairs programme that mice were agents of Satan and that Sharia law called for the extermination of all mice: from the common house mouse (Mus musculus) to cartoon mouse (Mickey Mouse).

A former diplomat attached to the Islamic Affairs Department at the Saudi embassy Washington, al-Munajid appears regularly on Saudi television to discuss religious and ethical topics. (Mickey Mouse must die by George Conger)

     Hmm, that's confusing, does that mean it was good that the Israelis killed Farfur?

Here is a video from 2015 in which a Palestinian girl explains how she wants to stab a Jew.

   Hamas has long courted top Palestinian high schoolers in order to groom them for future leadership positions within the organization. But these Hamas recruitment drives arent just limited to the secondary school level. Even preschoolers are sucked into the groups culture of death.   

    For example, another popular Hamas website, www.al-fateh.net, features snapshots of Palestinian pre-teens and toddlers dressed in Hamas military regalia and holding automatic weapons. (Junior Jihadists frontpagemag.com 8 6 04)

   Syria also creates paranoia toward Israel among children.   Dr. Meyrav Wurmser, Executive Director of the Middle East Research Media Institute (MEMRI, ), analyzed some 40 Syrian schoolbooks.   and found the following themes stressed in the Syrian school curriculum:

• Zionism is totally negated, and youngsters are inculcated with their moral obligation to take anti-Israel action.
• Zionism is colonialism, is based on fabrications, is similar to Nazism, and is the ultimate racist movement inspiring Nazi thought and action.
• Zionism endangers the Arab world in its entirety, and is the ultimate contradiction to Arab nationalism and the dream of Arab unity.
• Israel is an aggressive and expansionist enemy, singularly responsible for the backwardness of the Arab world.  Syrians must act to remove that threat to the Syrian state and obstacle to Arab unity through "holy war" and martyrdom.

   Dr. Wurmser adds that the Syrian educational system "expands hatred of Israel and Zionism to anti-Semitism directed at all Jews.    That anti-Semitism evokes ancient Islamic motifs to describe the unchangeable and treacherous nature of the Jews.  Its inevitable conclusion is that all Jews must be annihilated.

   A study released by B'nai B'rith International on 6/25/02 entitled, "Jihad, Jews, and Anti-Semitism in Syrian School Texts," cited many examples of anti-Semitism and anti-Israel sentiment including an excerpt from a 10th grade social studies text that describes Zionism as "a racist-imperialist-colonialist-aggressive-expansionist political movement." In an 11th grade reader, Zionism is called the "new Nazism" and a "model of racist evil." Eighth-graders are taught that, "It is known that the Jews of today do not have any connection to Palestine," and sixth-graders learn that "The Prophet [Muhammad] knew about the treacherous intention harbored in the Jews' souls." By age 15, Syrian children are read in their Islamic studies textbooks that Jews deserve to be liquidated: "Co-existence with them or having them as neighbors is an enormous danger that threatens Islamic and Arab existence with destruction and extinction... Their criminal intention should be turned against them by way of their elimination." An Islamic studies text for grade-5 students describes praises Palestinian youth for "rushing towards death, trying to reach it ahead of one another," and 6th-graders learn: "There is neither excuse nor forgiveness for the one who refrains from jihad for the cause of God, for the purification of Palestine of the Jews." (Jerusalem Post 6/26/02)

   Syria is having peace negotiations with Israel yet Fayez Al-Sayegh, a member of the Syrian negotiating team in a February 2 2000 article in Al-Thawra wrote

Israel...was established on Arab land following the banishment of its original inhabitants, their expulsion, and their murder in a series of horrible massacres...What is the Holocaust in comparison with these massacres?" 

   Syrian Defense Minister Mustafa Tlas, has resurrected his work, The Matzah of Zion.  Originally published in 1983, the book endorses the Damascus blood libel of 1840, promoting the medieval canard that Jews use the blood of non-Jews to make Passover matzahs.  In 2001, the Egyptian weekly Roz Al-Yussuf reports that Egyptian producer Munir Radhi is making a film adaptation of the book. According to Radhi,

The purpose of the film,  is to respond to all of the Zionist films distributed by the American film industry, which is backed by the Zionist propaganda apparatus.  Among these films is "Schindler's List" which supports the idea of the Jews "right to the land of Palestine."

   The Center for Monitoring the Impact of Peace and the American Jewish Committee released an analysis of 93 books that were part of the curricula of more than 2,000 Saudi schools in first through 10th grades from 19999 through 2002.  In the books Israel and Jews are frequently denounced as wicked, sly and crooked and maps in geography books label Israel as occupied Palestine.

Now Palestine is occupied by the Jews, a people of treachery and betrayal who have gathered there from every place, Poland, Spain, America and elsewhere.  Their end, by God's will is perdition.

read an eighth grade dictation exercise. 

    Western ideas are often given similar treatment in the Saudi textbooks, as history and geography books are filled with passages aobut the evils of the Crusaders.  The books say the current spread of Western ideals represents a danger to all Muslims.

    Islamic influence on American school texts is resulting in anti-Israel indoctrination of American school children (frontpagemag.com 3/19/04)

Andrew Bostom summarized some of the anti-Jewish indoctrination in these text books.  He wrote:

a 3-month long NY Daily News investigation of textbooks widely used in New York city area Islamic schools published March 30, 2003, demonstrated that the same Antisemitic archetypesbased on central motifs in the Koran, hadith, and siraare being taught to American Muslim students. The report provided these examples:


In Long Island City, Queens, for example, fifth- and sixth-graders at the Ideal Islamic School on 12th St. learn that Allah has revealed [pace Koran 2:61/3:112] that the Jews killed their own prophets and disobeyed Allah.Yet a third book, in use at the Ideal school, describes the hostile relations between Jews and the [Muslim prophet] Muhammad in Medina in the 7th century. The reasons for Jewish hostility lies in their general characteristics, the book says. Numerous Koranic citations follow with negative references to Jews - for example, You will ever find them deceitful, except for a few of them. [3:71; 4:46]


On Jewish hostility to Islam: The reasons for Jewish hostility toward the Muslims of 7th century Medina lies in their general characteristics described in the Koran. Example: You will find the most implacable of men in their enmity to the faithful are the Jews and the pagans. [Koran 5:82; from a textbook The Messenger of Allah, p. 34; targeting Grades 6-9]


Finally a review of textbooks from the Islamic Saudi Academy of Fairfax, VA published in October 2007 by the U.S. Commission on International Religious Freedom, concluded, according to commissioner Nina Shea, that they contain blatant Antisemitism, blaming the Jews even for divisions within Islam.. The latter charge repeats an allegation made continuously for over a millennium since the earliest Sunni historiographies (for example by al-Tabari, d. 923) that a renegade Yemenite Jew, Abdallah b. Saba, is responsibleidentified as a Jewfor promoting the Shiite heresy (as mentioned earlier) and fomenting the rebellion and internal strife associated with this primary breach in Islams political innocence, culminating in the assassination of the third Rightly Guided Caliph Uthman, and the bitter, lasting legacy of Sunni-Shiite sectarian strife.

     In an article published by the Saudi government daily Al-Riyadh (March 10, 2002), columnist, Dr. Umayma Ahmad Al-Jalahma of King Faysal University in Al-Dammam, wrote on "The Jewish Holiday of Purim."

This holiday [Purim] begins with a fast, on March 13, like the Jewess
Esther who vowed to fast. The holiday continues on March 14; during the
holiday, the Jews wear carnival-style masks and costumes and overindulge in
drinking alcohol, prostitution, and adultery. This holiday has become known
among Muslim historians as the "Holiday of Masks."

She also wrote about the Hamantashen Jews eat on Purim.

During this holiday, the Jew must prepare very special pastries, the
filling of which is not only costly and rare - it cannot be
found at all on the local and international markets.

Unfortunately, this filling cannot be left out, or substituted with any
alternative serving the same purpose.  For this holiday, the Jewish people
must obtain human blood so that their clerics can prepare the holiday
pastries. In other words, the practice cannot be carried out as required if
human blood is not spilled!!

Before I go into the details, I would like to clarify that the Jews'
spilling human blood to prepare pastry for their holidays is a
well-established fact, historically and legally, all throughout history.
This was one of the main reasons for the persecution and exile that were
their lot in Europe and Asia at various times...

Let us now examine how the victims' blood is spilled. For this, a
needle-studded barrel is used; this is a kind of barrel, about the size of
the human body, with extremely sharp needles set in it on all sides. [These
needles] pierce the victim's body, from the moment he is placed in the
barrel.

These needles do the job, and the victim's blood drips from him very
slowly. Thus, the victim suffers dreadful torment - torment that affords the
Jewish vampires great delight as they carefully monitor every detail of the
blood-shedding with pleasure and love that are difficult to comprehend.

After this barbaric display, the Jews take the spilled blood, in the bottle
set in the bottom [of the needle-studded barrel], and the Jewish cleric
makes his coreligionists completely happy on their holiday when he serves
them the pastries in which human blood is mixed.

      In the same month in the same paper (Al-Riyadh) Ms. Al-Jalahma wrote a piece "The U.S. Should Expel the Jews,".  She wrote that George Washington bemoaned the fact that the states "have not attempted to fight and annihilate the Jews - even though [the Jews] have proven to be a group of lethal insects who [pose] the gravest dangers to the United States and its security." She quotes Benjamin Franklin as agreeing, declaring that unless "you do not make haste and expel the Jews from our country today and forever, your children will curse you in your graves." These words, according to Ms. Al-Jalahma, came from a "1789 convention for the declaration of the American constitution." There, she writes that Benjamin Franklin demanded an amendment to ensure the deportation of Jews from the United States.(THE SAUDI MEDIA HATEFEST Diana West The Washington Times 3/22/2002).

     What you never read about this in the history books?  It must be a Zionist coverup!

   Prof Jalahma also explained why the American War with Iraq started in March. The New York Post )4/20/03) reported this as follows:

"The American war on Iraq started in March to concur with [the] Purim feast," Prof. Umayma Jalahma explained last week, according to a report by the Middle East Media Research Institute.

Why is Purim a good time for war?

Because, Jalahma wrote last year, on Purim, "the Jewish people must obtain human blood so that their clerics can prepare the holiday pastries . . . That affords the Jewish vampires great delight."

The West went to war in March, you see, to collect Arab blood for hamantaschen.

   In an article that I think was published in September 2002 in the official Saudi daily newspaper Al-Jazira, columnist Dr. Muhammad bin S'ad Al-Shwey'ir also accused Jews of using human blood for holiday celebrations. Excerpts from the column:

Christian Europe showed enmity toward the Jews when it transpired that their rabbis craftily hunt anyone walking alone, [tempting] him to enter their house of worship. Then they take his blood to use for baked goods for their holidays, as part of their ritual. Often this deed was uncovered. When these incidents proliferated, the security apparatuses began to follow them, until they caught their rabbis committing the crime. The 24th protocol [of the anti-Semitic book "Protocols of the Elders of Zion," which claims that the Jewish people secretly strive for world conquest] represents the goal towards which the Jews strive with their tactics, their false media, and their treachery. The free world must take notice. where the intentions of the Jews have been revealed as they gnaw away at the societies like the worm gnaws away at the wood until it is entirely consumed before signs [of the damage are visible]. [The West and America] must awaken, and must support the Muslims against [the Jews] before it is too late.

    In 1960, when Adolf Eichmann was abducted from his hiding-hole in Buenos Aires by Israeli secret agents, Saudi Arabia's principal government-controlled newspaper recorded the event as:

    ARREST OF EICHMANN, WHO HAD THE HONOR OF KILLING 6 MILLION JEWS.

In an apparent attempt to turn the tables on critics of Saudi incitement of Jew hatred (Saudis Fabricate Report of Jews Teaching Hatred WorldnetDaily 6/13/03):

a Saudi-owned weekly published a story claiming a study shows Israeli society is teaching its children to hate Palestinian children, making a peace agreement impossible.

However, in a statement sent to WorldNetDaily, the author of the study says Arabic-language al-Majalla magazine completely misrepresented his work.

The Egyptians who signed a peace treaty with Israel are busy creating paranoia toward the Jews as well.  The following is an example that appeared in Al-Akhbar, February 8, 2000.

Zionist propaganda continues, even today, to raise the issue of the Nazi crematoria for Jews, although the historical evidence, revealed by renowned German, British, and French historians, proved that claims that such crematoria existed in the Nazi detention camps are jokes...  [These claims were] used by the Zionist movement for two purposes: first, to terrify the European countries during World War II so that the Jews would flee from Europe to Palestine, because the Zionist movement realized that the Jews ignored its call to immigrate to Palestine..." (Al-Gumhuriya , March 4, 2000) "Israel is the second country, after Nazi Germany, that has a clear Nazi basis and carries out a policy of ethnic cleansing, from Dir Yassin to Sabra and Shatila.   Israel is unique in its corrupt and base political and social system that discriminates between people based on their religion or ethnicity... 

  The Egyptian who wrote the above paragaph is actually doing two things.  He's making the Jews appear worse than they are and the Nazis appear better than they are.  Hesham Mohamed Ali Hadayet the man who opened fire at a crowded El Al airlines ticket counter on July 4, 02 and killed two people before he himself was killed, believed that (The New York Times 7/5/02):

the Israelis tried to destroy the Egyptian nation and the Egyptian population by sending prostitutes with AIDS to Egypt.

and that

the two biggest drug dealers in New York are Israeli.

  Since the mid 1990s (during the peace process) Jews were accused of deliberately infecting the young people of the Muslim world with AIDS and of spreading homosexuality in Arab society, of contaminating Egyptian agriculture, and propagating Satanic cults among Egyptian youth.(A-Sha'ab, October 3, 1995; Al-Ah'd, October 13, 1995; A-Sha'ab, November 3, 1995; cited in Porat, Dina (Chief Editor), Anti-Semitism Worldwide 1995/6, Tel Aviv, The project for the Study of Anti-Semitism, Tel Aviv University, 1996, p. 180.)  The Jews were accused of selling sex-stimulating chewing gum and fruits with hormones which kill male sperm. 

  The Arabs are so paranoid of the Jews that according to an article by Christopher Dickey and Gameela Ismail in Arabic Newsweek (April 16, 2001) and that was posted on the web by MSN many believe that Pokemon are really Zionist agents.  Pokemon are very popular animated creatures, developed by Satoshi Tajiri.  According to the article:

IN WHAT MAY be the most bizarre pronouncement since his predecessor declared the world flat, Saudi Arabias mufti, Sheikh Abdul Aziz bin Abdullah al-Sheikh, has issued a formal fatwa on Nintendos monsterettes, banning the wildly popular game from the kingdom.

His reason: Pokemon includes card trading, which the mufti denounces as gambling. Worse still, Pokemons constantly morphing creatures evoke Darwins theory of evolution. According to the mufti, thats Islamically unacceptable. Andsurprise, surprisePikachu and his Pokey pals are clearly Zionist agents. That six-pointed Star of David is a sly symbol for their powers.

Though many serious Islamic thinkers find his reasoning laughable, the mufti has garnered support among some influential religious conservatives in the Arab worldand among populations ready to see conspiracy wherever they look.

Qatars Islamic authorities have joined in the edict. Dubais have declared Pokemon un-Islamic. In Jordan rumor has it that Pokemon, which is short for pocket monsters, means Jewish in Japanese or, more arcanely, I am a Jew in Syriac, a Middle Eastern language related to ancient Aramaic. The Syriac Orthodox Church in Jordan received so many threats that it felt compelled to publish an announcement in the local press denying it had any Pokemon connections.

In Egypt, the hysteria has reached fever pitch. Im not letting my kids eat any more potato chips that have Pokemon coins inside since we all know that they have a material that gets into the skin of the potato, then into their stomachs and then causes infertility, wrote one parent in a letter to the editor of the semi-official daily, Al-Ahram.

        Mahmood Abdallah, a history teacher in Kerdasa primary school, warned: Our kids deal in these cards daily. They touch them and rub off the material covering the card which, in turn, will affect their fertility. They want our population to diminish so they can defeat us.

     Another bizarre accusation was made by Egyptian Cleric Mahmoud Al-Masri who said that The Protocols of the Elders of Zion Use Soccer to Distract the Islamic Peoples,"

     Abu Dhabi broadcast a TV program of a skit in which Prime Minister Sharon is portrayed drinking Palestinian blood (Arutz 7 News, Nov 18, 01). 

   A good source for incitement in the Arab media is the Middle East Research Media Institute (MEMRI) website.  One can view creation of paranoia by the Palestinian Authority on their web site www.ipc.gov.ps .

     Dr. Louis Rene Beres a Professor of Political Science at Purdue University wrote the following about creation of paranoia in the Middle East and by the Nazis in an article sent out by the Freeman Center.

In 1972  Yehoshafat Harkabi published a major book titled ARAB ATTITUDES TO ISRAEL.  At that time, in the days of The Old Middle East, Harkabi cited the Arab use of scurrilous language about Israel to include "the Zionist monster;" "the Zionist plague;"  "the purulent abscess;" "the illegitimate daughter of Europe;" "a cancer in the heart of the Arab nation;" "the Zionist cancer;" "the gang of hypocrites and criminals;" "the focus of evil;" "dirt;" "filth;" "sewage;" "the octopus;" "the spider;" "the bacillus of evil;"  etc, etc, etc. Hamas's, charter still calls unambiguously for Muslims to deal with Jews in only one way:  "Assault and kill;  assault and kill; assault and kill."

Let us return to the Nazis.  As objects of their propaganda, Jews  were notorious because they allegedly devalued German life, threatened its "racial purity," and threatened its very physical survival.  Hence, the Jews were "pests," "parasites," "bloodsuckers," "child murderers," "molesters,"  etc, who exploited "real Germans," despoiled "Aryan" purity and, of course, always conspired to acquire power.

  Islamic creation of paranoia has been so successful in the Arab world that when the Israelis hunted terrorist in Jenin and offered the Palestinian Arabs blood for their wounded the Palestinians refused because it was Jewish blood (The Jewish Journal May 29, 2002). 

  Libyan leader Moammar Khadafy has accused the United States of having manufactured the AIDS virus.  On September, 1, 2001 he said:

America manufactured the AIDS virus in its military laboratories and it must take the responsibility for the treatment of AIDS victims...

Evidence exists now that America set off the AIDS virus when it launched its bacterial defense programs in the early 1980s.

XVI Creation of Paranoia by the Jewish Left

  The first and most serious creation of paranoia was by a Jewish convert to Christianity who told Christians that as part of Jewish ritual Jews use Christian children's blood.  The blood libel has cost the lives of untold number of Jews through the ages.

  Many of the early Zionists were socialists who dreamed of creating a Utopian state.  When the British limited immigration these Zionists, instead of fighting the British selected the "better" i.e. socialist Jews to come to Israel.    There were heroic Jews, led by Vladimir Jabotinsky, who did struggle to help their brethren flee Europe.  Yitzhak Ben Ami wrote in Days of Wrath, Days of Glory that Ben-Gurion, the Socialist leader, regularly called Jabotinsky "Vladimir Hitler" and the National Zionist Organization  (N.Z.O) the "N.A.Z.O.".  These people were a threat to Ben Gurion's authority and the Labor leadership because they were doing what Labor was failing to do.  They formed a delegation in the United States to get help for the Jews of Europe.  The American Zionist Council, like Ben Gurion saw the Jews who were pressing the United States to save the Jews of Europe as a threat to their power.  They delivered a fourteen page document to the U.S. Department of Justice  that said the raison d'etre of the delegation's existence was to destroy the existing Zionist leadership and to place themselves in control of Zionist affairs.

Yitzhak Ben Ami wrote that:

With four million Jews dead, and millions more about to be killed, the Establishment was concerned, above all, with control.

When Jabotinsky's followers tried to raise money from Robert Rothschild, Chaim Weizmann, a follower of Ben Gurion's, warned Rothschild "When you soup with the devil, you've got to have a long spoon."  Weizmann warned Rothschild that not all of these immigrants formed an altogether satisfactory element.  American Jewish Leaders such as Rabbi Stephen Wise, Rose Halprin, the leader of Hadassah and Henry Montor, head of the United Palestine Appeal followed Ben Gurion's lead and issued instructions to the Jews of the United States not to contribute funds to assist the followers of Jabotinsky in rescuing the Jews of Europe and not to contribute funds to the several thousand "unselected" immigrants assembling in the Danube delta for immigration to Palestine.

  The Jewish Left in it's zeal to bring peace to the Middle East introduced a pro-Arab and anti-Israeli texts into the school curriculum while Ehud Barak was prime minister.  It also suppressed free speech of the Israeli right (See Steve Plaut, The Assault on Free Speech in Israel.  One of these was a poem by a Militant Palestinian Nationalist and the other was a history text which distorted Israeli history to fit the leftist ideology.  When Sharon came to power he appointed Limor Livnat to restore to head the education ministry.  She removed the poem and the history text from the curriculum.  The Israeli left cried that she was suppressing freedom of speech. 

   Columnist Gidon Spiro compared Livnat's actions to the repressive measures adopted by the Chinese Communist party against its foes (Kol Hazman, March 16). Hebrew University Prof. Eli Poudeh warned that if Livnat continues on her current course, "the Education Ministry will turn into, in the words of George Orwell, the Ministry of 'Truth' " (Ha'aretz, March 19).

   Tom Segev, considered to be one of Israel's top journalists, labeled Livnat the "Batwoman of Zionism" and asserted, "Her fury transforms her into a sister of the Buddha-smashing Taliban in Afghanistan" (Ha'aretz, March 16). Columnist Yoel Marcus invoked the shadows of the past when he wrote, "What will she do next? Burn books in the downtown districts of Israel's cities?" (Ha'aretz, March 16).

Aryeh Stav compiled a list of antisemitic remarks by the Jewish Left regarding the Israeli ultra-orthodox (Haredim) (Notes on the Dialectics of Israeli Antisemitism (freeman.org broadcast 10/22/04).  I include some of the remarks below.

Meretz MK Ran Cohen considers them to be "black ants".
Journalist Amnon Dankner thinks of them as dogs, "tied up in the yard and barking Psalms all night long".
Tour guide Sefi Ben-Yosef sees them as "a humming collection of locusts". Poet Moshe Dor pictures them as "the dark forces of our era".
Columnist Amnon Avramovicz maintains that they are "a death-causing plague".
Commentator Natan Donevitz imagines them as "black swarms".
Yoel Marcus, author and newspaperman, knows they are "black forces" and "soul snatchers".

Playwright Yosef Mondey opines that they are "rude baboons".
The now defunct Marxist daily, Al HaMishmar, the mouthpiece of the Mapam party, held them to be "barbarians...the black front...representing the most mystical, magical, primitive urge...their schools are institutes of darkness".
Gideon Sammet, journalist and former diplomat, knows they are "the most obscurantist and ugly phenomena of our time".

Shulamit Aloni, former Education Minister and progressive politician, is convinced they are "bloodsuckers...snakes...suckling from the most darkest urges that the Nazi horror suckled from. They are greedy, domineering, evil and primitive, immoral, parasitical and power-hungry".
Uri Avnery, media person, sees them as "bloodsuckers".
Meretz MK Professor Naomi Chazan "a terrible evil...a black genie". Acclaimed writer Amos Oz "armed groups of gangsters, criminals against humanity, sadists, pogromists and murderers...".
(All the quotations appeared in newspapers and other periodicals except for the words of Shulamit Aloni which were spoken in the Knesset Chamber).

Aryeh Stav write that in an article published on June 8, 1989 in the Yediot Ahronot daily, under the title "In the Name of the Life and the Death", the Israeli author Amos Oz penned these phrases about Gush Emunim, the Bloc of the Faithful:

[Gush Emunim is] "a messianic junta, insular and cruel, a bunch of armed gangsters, criminals against humanity, sadists, pogromists and murderers, that exited out from some dark corner of Judaism...from out of cellars of bestiality and defilement...in order to cause a thirsty and insane blood worship to rule."

I personally visited a Gush Emunim village on a visit to Israel when I was a teenager and attended one of their worship services and can testify that they are no such thing and I write this as a secular Humanist.  Aryeh Stav also wrote about what the Jewish left says should be done with the Haredim. 

"The Charedim should be hanged from the lampposts" suggested the Hebrew University scholar, Dr. Uzi Ornan; "because they are religiously observant, they should receive the death penalty" wrote Yediot Ahronot ; "the time has come to bury them" advises Uri Avnery ; "Meah Shearim should be entered with half-tracks and 50-caliber machine-guns, and to crush them"

   The Israeli left goes as far as inciting the Arabs to violence.  Left-wing writer Uri Avnery calls for the Palestinians to continue their war against Israel. In an article in the official Palestinian Authority newspaper Al Hayat al-Jadida, Avnery wrote, "The Palestinians have attained a great victory in the battle over the settlements. The conclusion is that you should not stop the intifada, but if you must [stop], then do so only for tactical reasons." (Thursday June 21, 2001 Arutz 7)

  The Israeli left also blames the Jewish victims of terror.  On the night of July 2, 2001, extensive searches were underway for Ya'ir Har-Sinai , 51, of Susia, who had not returned after a day of shepherding. The father of nine, his body was finally found with bullet holes to his head and back.

  Susia resident Akiva London told Israel's channel 7 about his late friend: "Ya'ir was a unique figure in Susia. He was friendly with the Arabs, he lived with nature, was always with his sheep, refused to take weapons and not even a radio, with the idea that no one will harm him if he is 'clean.' For years we were afraid for him, and we always tried to get him to take at least a walkie-talkie. He was a man of great faith in G-d. He didn't want to use modern things, but rather electricity from wind-powered sources and water from a cistern; he lived in a stone house on the edge of Susia; he dressed in the way in which he felt that our ancestors dressed 2,000 years ago... He was very environment-conscious, and zealously guarded the state-owned lands. He had nine children.

  A spokesman for the left wing Rabbis for Human Rights organization, which is against Jewish settlements in Judea and Samaria and which therefore regards all settlers as bad, created paranoia toward the terror victim by issuing the following statement:

Today a brutal person was brutally murdered... Yair Har Sinai, a settler about whom I have heard Palestinians speak fearfully as long as I have been working for RHR, was found murdered at 3:00 AM...

   Rabbis for Human Rights and B'tselem ran bold ads in the newspapers the week of March 1-7, 02,  equating Prime Minister Ariel Sharon, Binyamin Ben-Eliezer, and Meir Sheetrit with Saddam Hussein, the Ayatollah Khomeini, and Idi Amin! Why? Because they supported the passage of a Knesset law that will keep Hizbullah and Amal chieftains Obeid and Dirani behind Israeli bars. "Israel is turning into a terrorist and outlaw state that holds hostages," claimed the ads.  It is remarkable that the Jewish Left would make such accusations against the government for keeping terrorist leaders under arrest.

   The leader of the Meretz party Yossi Sarid was quoted in Haaretz as calling the Jewish settlers "a cancerous growth"... "the Sodom of the Jewish state"... "members of a different planet" ... "not my brothers" ...  
"who make me ashamed of being an Israeli and a Jew."

  Yet, paradoxically, when Chief of General Staff Moshe Ya'alon referred to the confrontation with the Palestinians as an "existential cancerous threat to Israel," he was accused of using Nazi terminology and told "he should know when to shut up" by Yossi's left wing colleagues.

   The most likely explanation for this is that Yossi and his colleagues see the settlers as a threat to peace with the Palestinians and do not fear antagonizing the settlers since they know the settlers are peaceful and not likely to do anything.  By demonizing the settlers they hope they can eventually convince the Israeli public to force them to withdraw.  At the same time as they demonize the settlers they condemn and attempt to silence those who criticize the Palestinians because they know the Palestinians are violent and are afraid such criticism will lead to further violence.  In essence the Settler's peaceful nature is a reason for the creation of paranoia toward them by the left whereas the Palestinian's violent behavior is a reason to not criticize them.

    Leftists in Israeli Academia have created paranoia against their country with statements such as:

'Fortress Israel, as we call it, is by necessity based on a culture of strength, violence and crudity. In the final analysis, it will be the bulldozer that razes the structure that once was Israel.

Israels Nazification needs no dictatorship since plenty of sturdy little Hitlers seem to be securely ensconced in a great many number of hearts.

Israel wants to do more than keep the suicide bombers out. . . .  It wants to erase the Palestinian nation once and for all.

This unarmed uprising was turned into an armed revolt by harsh Israeli retaliation to demonstrations and street protests.

There is an entire sector in the Jewish public which I unhesitatingly define as a copy of the German Nazis.

STOP ISRAEL!

The Israeli army has been terrorizing cities and villages in the West Bank. . .  there is one simple thing that anybody can do: Boycott Israel!... Israel is not the US. It is a small country with hardly any economy, and with a self-image completely detached from reality. It can be stopped.

These leftists are being monitored at Israel Academic Monitor.

    One way Israeli leftists apparently create paranoia is to cut down Arab olive trees and blame that on the settlers.  Hillel Fendel wrote in Israel National News (Tree Cutting "Libel"-Once Again, Jews Stand Accused 11/28/05)

It was widely reported Sunday, in the name of Arab sources in the Palestinian Authority-controlled areas, that Jewish settlers from the Shomron had chopped down 200 olive trees owned by Arabs. The Ynet site, for instance, wrote, "Palestinian sources reported that settlers from an outpost near Elon Moreh had cut down" the trees.

The reports were immediately followed by condemnations of the Jewish population in the Shomron and Israel's rule there. The extremist left-wing organization "Peace Now" released a statement saying that the incident was a direct result of the lack of law enforcement in the areas and the continuing "problem of the [Jewish] outposts."

However, the Yesha Council looked into the matter and said that though "we condemn all violence, including harming Palestinian property," it had found that the incident was apparently a provocation staged by extreme left-wing activists who "wish to sully their Jewish brothers, while at the same time extending their hand to terrorists."

The residents of Elon Moreh, in a statement, "wish to emphasize that we have no connection with this incident, which is based on the testimony of a single Arab."

A widely-published AP photo of an Arab woman weeping and embracing an allegedly chopped-down tree (similar photos were taken by Reuters, AFP, and others] shows that the trunk is intact, and that only the top branches are cut off - as if it had been purposely pruned. In fact, the Haifa-based Land of Israel Task Force says that this is exactly what happened.

"The left-wingers and Arabs pulled the same trick last year," Task Force head Aviad Visuly said, "and using the same method." Photos of the trees show that the branches were sawed off in a manner that is beneficial to the trees. "Why would vandals bother sawing off each individual branch? Wouldn't they just cut down the trunk?"

The branches begin growing back 2-3 months after they are cut, and grow to full size within two years. "In the meanwhile," Visuly said, "the orchard owners receive stipends from the Saudis, via the PA."

Those who made the accusations refused to submit to lie detector tests.

These left wing Jews separated themselves from other Jews and then hated them in part to absolve themselves of outside hostility toward Jews. Francisco Gil White wrote:

But many other assimilated Jews, finding themselves in limbo, rejected by the Christian society they had tried to assimilate to, and incapable of solidarity with a traditional Jewish community they had abandoned and attacked, concluded that they must really be plagued by an intrinsic inferiority that could not be shaken. Coming thus to the logical end of their ideology, they arrived at that singular phenomenon: hatred of their own selves, culminating in the pathos of that absurd -- though ideologically consistent -- curtain call of suicide. It was the case, for example, of Otto Weininger, who converted to Christianity in 1902, followed by his family. A year later he argued in Sex and Character that women were inferior in everything, devoting also a chapter to Jewish inferiority. He went out of his way to point out that he was a Jew and not excluded from his own condemnations. A year later he took the logical step and killed himself.

    Left wing Jews create paranoia to Americans they don't agree with.  The left wing Jewish Anti-Defamation League attacked Rep. Virgil Goode Jr., R-Va., after he said:

"In the next century, we will have many more Muslims in the United States if we do not adopt the strict immigration policies that I believe are necessary to preserve the values and beliefs traditional to the United States of America."

The ADL attacked Rep Goode, saying,

"Bigots have always hid behind the immigration issue."

Is Rep Goode a bigot or is his statement the truth?  Hint: Europe is becoming Eurabia.

XVII Funding Paranoia Creation

   Saudia Arabia poses as an ally of the democracies in the anti-terrorist coalition while wealthy Saudis spend vast sums of its oil revenues to promote their radical brand of Islam Wahhabism through Organizations such as the Muslim World League.  Jay Tolson in his article "Struggle For Islam" that appeared in U.S. News and World Report Oct 15, 2001 writes how:

Saudi Arabia...actively supports the spread of its own homegrown brand of puritanical and intolerant Islam.  From the madrasahs of Pakistan to the mosques of Indonesia to Islamic centers in Europe and the United States, that brand of Wahhabi Islam has challenged traditional, locally inflected, and usually broad-minded versions of the faith, spreading an intolerant religiosity that can spawn violence in the name of holy war...Wahhabi money and influence permeate many Muslim organizations and mosques in Western Europe and North America, even though studies have shown that most American mosques eschew radical or literalist Islam. 

   Perhaps there are such studies but clearly not all American Mosques eschew radical Islam.  On August 5, 2004, the leader of an Albany mosque who was listed as "The Commander" in an address book carried by a terrorist in Iraq was busted on terror charges tied to the purchase of a shoulder-fired missile.

    An 89-page report by Freedom House's Center for Religious Freedom, "Saudi Publications on Hate Ideology Fill American Mosques" had the following key findings of the report (wnd.com 1/29/04, Report: Saudis Spread  Hate Through U.S. Mosques):

• Various Saudi government publications gathered for the study, most of which are in Arabic, assert it is a religious obligation for Muslims to hate Christians and Jews and warn against imitating, befriending, or helping them in any way or taking part in their festivities and celebrations;
• The documents promote contempt for the United States because it is ruled by legislated civil law rather than by totalitarian Wahhabi-style Islamic law. They condemn democracy as un-Islamic;
• The documents stress that when Muslims are in the lands of the unbelievers, they must behave as if on a mission behind enemy lines. Either they are there to acquire new knowledge and make money to be later employed in the jihad against the infidels, or they are there to proselytize the infidels until at least some convert to Islam.

Any other reason for lingering among the unbelievers in their lands is illegitimate, and unless a Muslim leaves as quickly as possible, he or she is not a true Muslim and so too must be condemned. For example, a document in the collection for the "Immigrant Muslim" bears the words "Greetings from the Cultural Attache in Washington, D.C." of the Embassy of Saudi Arabia, and is published by the government of Saudi Arabia.

In an authoritative religious voice, it gives detailed instructions on how to "hate" the Christian and Jew: Never greet them first. Never congratulate the infidel on his holiday. Never imitate the infidel. Do not become a naturalized citizen of the United States. Do not wear a graduation gown because this imitates the infidel;

• Other Muslims, especially those who advocate tolerance, are condemned as infidels. The opening fatwa in one Saudi embassy-distributed book, published by the Saudi Air Force, responds to a question about a Muslim preacher in a European mosque who taught that it is not right to condemn Jews and Christians as infidels. The Saudi state cleric's reply rebukes the Muslim cleric: "He who casts doubts about their infidelity leaves no doubt about his." Since, under Saudi law, "apostates' from Islam can be sentenced to death, this is an implied death threat against the tolerant Muslim imam, as well as an incitement to vigilante violence;
• Sufi and Shiite Muslims are viciously condemned;
• For a Muslim who fails to uphold the Saudi Wahhabi sect's sexual mores [i.e. through homosexual activity or heterosexual activity outside of marriage], the edicts published by the Saudi government's Ministry of Islamic Affairs and found in American mosques advise "it would be lawful for Muslims to spill his blood and to take his money";
• Regarding those who convert out of Islam, the Saudi Ministry of Islamic Affairs explicitly asserts, they "should be killed";
• Saudi textbooks and other publications in the collection, propagate a Nazi-like hatred for Jews, treat the forged Protocols of the Elders of Zion as historical fact, and avow that the Muslim's duty is to eliminate the state of Israel;
• Regarding women, the Saudi publications instruct that they should be veiled, segregated from men and barred from certain employment and roles.
  
  

   Saudi money funded the Pakistani madrassahs that spawned the Taliban.   According to Philip Smucker and Michael Satchell in their article Hearts and Minds, U.S. News and World Report, Oct 15, 2001:

Pakistan's madrasahs may be grooming as many as 4.5 million budding mujahideen.  

   Smucker and Satchell write that the widely respected Sheik Sami ul Haq runs the Haqqania madrasah and that:

He repeats the belief widespread throughout the region that the September 11 attacks on America were an Israeli plot to discredit its Muslim enemies.  "The purpose of the Jewish planners is to pit the Americans against the Muslims: Adolf Hitler knew a lot about controlling the Jews [and] we need a rebirth of Nazi Germany" the Haqqania rector declares.

   Seyyed Vali Reza Nar, a professor of political science at the University of San Diego, said in a speech he delivered in Washington in 2000 that:

The rogue states [such as Iraq and Libya] are less important in the radicalization of Islam than Saudi Arabia.

   The Saudis are creating paranoid delusions of the West by funding these Madrassahs.   According to the October 8th 2001, Weekly Standard, Wahhabi doctrine justifies the unrestrained destruction and bloodshed by Moslems through history including massacres of non-Wahhabi Moslems in the 18th century, the slaughter of 58 tourists in Egypt in 1997, the orgy of killing in Algeria in the 1990s and the assault on the World Trade Center in September 11, 2001.  The Taliban and Osama Bin Ladin are Wahabis.  The conspirators against the World Trade Center were all Saudis.   Powerful elements in Saudi society have supported bin Laden through out his campaign of terror, just as they support the Taliban.  John Podhoretz wrote in his column in the New York Post (Oct 17, 01) that Vincent Cannistraro, a former CIA official, told the Los Angeles Times that:

There is a whole pile of Saudi businessmen who have been providing regular contributions to al Qaeda.  The amounts of money from Saudi businessmen going to the al Qaeda organization accounts for much of the resources the al Qaeda has.

   Seymour Hersh in an article in the New Yorker, called Kings Ransom (10/22/01) wrote that:

Since 1994 or earlier, the National Security Agency has been collecting electronic intercepts of conversations between members of the Saudi Arabian royal family, which is headed by King Fahd. The intercepts depict a regime increasingly corrupt, alienated from the country's religious rank and file, and so weakened and frightened that it has brokered its future by channelling hundreds of millions of dollars in what amounts to protection money to fundamentalist groups that wish to overthrow it.

The intercepts have demonstrated to analysts that by 1996 Saudi money was supporting Osama bin Laden's Al Qaeda and other extremist groups in Afghanistan, Lebanon, Yemen, and Central Asia, and throughout the Persian
Gulf region.

   According to Stephen Schwartz in his article "The Islamofascists" New York Post Nov. 4, 2001 p34:

The Wahhabi-Saudi establishment subsidizes terrorism while seeking to control Muslim religious institutions and activities around the world.  Saudi influence reaches even the overwhelming majority of mosques in the United States...In 1999 Kabbani (a critic of the Wahhabis and member of the Islamic Supreme Council of America) warned that 80 percent of mosques in the United States are subject to Wahhabi manipulation through financial subsidies...Wahhabism is based on the justification and promotion of violence against all, including Muslims, who do not share the Wahhabi outlook.   Kabbani has called this its "most harmful legacy to society."...Dr. Gibril Fuad Haddad a Lebanese writer and opponent of Wahhabism-Saudism, has placed nearly the whole Islamic establishment in America and other Western countries on the roster of Saudi-subsidized propagandists.  This includes the functionaries who stood alongside President Bush at the Washington Islamic Center soon after Sept. 11.

   Items in the Wahhabi-Saudi budget, according to Stephen Schwartz include $250,000 for an education center in Washington, and 30 million for Islamic associations in India.

   As long as this indoctrination continues there will be more bin Ladens.   The following picture is of a baby whose Jordanian mother named him Osama bin Laden (New York Post 11/30/01).

   Within hours of Israel's killing Sheik Yassin there were several more.   A father of one of the newborns  said he would be proud if his son one day shared the fate of his more famous namesake.  (New York Post 3/24/04)  Saudi Arabians have funded Hamas hit teams and the Kassam rocket to be used against Israel (New York Post 1/3/02 p20).

     According to Lee Kaplan in an article titled  The Saudi Fifth Column on Our Nations Campuses (wnd.com 4/5/04)

Over the last 30 years the saudi royal family has contributed upwards of 70 billion US dollars to infiltrate worldwide institutions with propaganda against the West and Israel.

..

One wonders why a theocratic totalitarian regime where 30% to 50% of the population is illiterate, and where PhDs teach that Jews use the blood of gentile children to make matzoh, would take such interest in the American educational system instead of their own. Yet the money the Saudis are pouring into our universities and colleges as gifts and endowments is alarming: King Fahd donated $20 million dollars to set up a Middle East Studies Center at the University of Arkansas; $5 million was donated to UC Berkeleys Center For Middle East Studies from two Saudi sheiks linked to funding Al Qaeda; $2.5 million dollars to Harvard; $8.1 million dollars to Georgetown including a $500,000 scholarship in the name of President Bush; $11 million dollars to Cornell; $1.5 million dollars to Texas A&M; $5 million dollars to MIT; $1 million dollars to Princeton; Rutgers received $5 million dollars to endow a chair as did Columbia which tried to hide where the money came from.  Saudi largesse included UC Santa Barbara; Johns Hopkins; Rice University; American University in Washington, D.C.; University of Chicago; Syracuse University; USC; UCLA; Duke University; and Howard University among many others.

XVIII The Cause of Secular Anti-Semitism

   While there is a lot of evidence supporting religious causes for the cause of anti-semitism they leave a major question unanswered which is why is there secular antisemitism?  Why did those Nazis who were anti-Christian, hate the Jews?  Why do the Communists, for example, who reject religion altogether, hate the Jews? 

   Both Marx, the founder of communism and Hitler the leader of Nazism, grew up in antisemitic environments.  William Nicholls in his book Christian Antisemitism, a History of Hate: wrote that:

Hitler had "known" from childhood that Jews were bad because he had been brought up in a Catholic milieu.

   The Nazis and Hitler had great admiration for Nietzsche.  Nietzsche saw Christianity as a "semitic infection".  He wrote in The Antichrist, that:

The Jews, have made mankind so thoroughly false that even today the Christian can feel anti-Jewish without realizing that he is himself the ultimate Jewish consequence.  

   William Nichols wrote that:

Nietzsche, for his part, was radically opposed to the christian ethic, with its emphasis on mercy.  This was a reversal of the true Aryan values of "pride, severity, strength, hatred, revenge."  Who had been responsible for this transvaluation of values?  None other than the Jews.

   Solomon Zeitlin in the introduction to his book Who Crucified Jesus? wrote about how first the Jews were reproached by the masses for crucifying Jesus and then they were reproached for having given Jesus to the world.  He wrote:

Many writers in Germany have given impetus to the thought that Christianity was a slave religion devised by the Jews to enchain the strong and by an ethic of pity and compassion to rob them of their natural power to rule.   This, they claimed, was the real Jewish conspiracy against the world.

The writings of Karl Marx were antisemitic and the antisemitism in his writings may have contributed to the antisemitism of the Communists.    But why was Karl Marx, antisemitic?  Karl Marx lived in an antisemitic environment.  In such an environment there is bound to be a lot of slander against the Jews.  In addition paranoia toward a group leads to the development of conspiracy theories about that group.   It is likely that such slander and conspiracies convinced Karl Marx that the Jews were evil.  The Nazis believed extremely paranoid conspiracy theories about the Jews.   The self-propagating nature of paranoia is such that even when the original cause of the paranoia is gone, (in this case the belief in Christianity) it continues to propagate itself.  This is illustrated further in the vicious cycle diagram below.

   Karl Marx believed that capitalism was a major root of evil in society and the causes of capitalism were greed, dishonesty and self interest.  If one were to start from those assumptions and combine that with the assumption that Jews are evil one might conclude that Jews are greedy dishonest and selfish.  Karl Marx wrote (Bottomore, Karl Marx; Early Writings):

What is the profane basis of Judaism?  Practical need, self-interest.  What is the worldly cult of the Jew?  Huckstering.  What is his worldly god?  Money.

and

The social emancipation of the Jew is the emancipation of society from Judaism.

   This is a very ominous statement because it suggests that the Utopia of Marx's dreams can be achieved by getting rid of the Jews.  It's quite possible that Marx was hostile to religions in general, he called religion "The opiate of the masses".  He may have been hostile to religion because he wanted people to believe in his system of beliefs and felt that any competing system of beliefs would interfere.

Francisco Gil White gives alternative reasons why Marx may have been so anti-Jewish. He argues that Marx whose father was a Jew who converted to Christianity was trying to prove to his anti-Semitic peers that he was not one of those evil Jews. Dr. Gil White writes:

We have here the prototype of the assimilated Jew, who wants to demonstrate to Christians that he is truly on the other side, a good Jew, acceptable because he attacks his former people. Marx was quite loud and proud in his displays of antisemitism.

   After 1991 a lot of information came out exposing the evils of the Soviet regime.  When  Jamie Glasov presented this information to left wing historians he knew they dismissed it.  He asked Professors John Earl Haynes and Harvey Klehr, the authors of In Denial: Historians, Communism, and Espionage why these historians were so dismissive of the evidence that he presented to them.  Klehr answered:

Jamie, many of those you speak of live in a different reality from that of the rest of us. Psychologically, they do not see what you see. They see the present and the past through a special lens. What is overwhelmingly clear to them is an imagined future collectivist utopia where antagonisms of class and race have been eliminated, the economic and social inequalities that have driven people to crime have been removed, poverty does not exist and social justice reigns, world brotherhood has replaced war and international strife, and an economy planned by people like them has produced economic abundance without pollution or waste. Coupled with this vision of the future is loathing of the real present which falls woefully short of these goals and hatred for anyone or anything that stands in the way of their illusion of the radiant future.

   Klehr's answer may also shed light on Marx's thinking.  Marx may have hated any belief system that he felt stood in the way of his illusion of a radiant future.   He wanted to create a wonderful socialist man and believed that Jews were the antithesis of this and so hated them.  Marx didn't like religion in general probably because he wanted people to believe his religion, the religion of communism and not their religion.  From Marx's point of view Jews may have been doubly bad, because not only were Jews the antithesis of the ideal socialist man, they were also believers in a religion which wasn't his religion.  They were non-believers.  The irony of all of this is there were many Jewish communists of Jewish origin who foolishly believed that communism would lead to a better world.

   Although Communism is a secular ideology much of the antisemitism of the Soviet Union is carried along certain popularly responsive religious themes. According to a position paper of the Union of Councils for Soviet Jews Antisemitism in the Soviet Union, an Overview:

The current messages of choice remain the most ancient ones--the Jew as Christ-killer and the "blood libel," in which Jews are accused of killing Christian youths and using their blood for sacramental purposes, such as the baking of matzos for Passover. These themes continue to find currency, especially in Russia, Belarus and Ukraine. They were also revived in 1995 by a Tashkent judge, who raised the blood libel possibility in the infamous murder trial of an innocent Bukharan Jew, Iosef Koinov.

   The combined influence of religion and Karl Marx's antireligious ideology may be the reason for both the antisemitism and anti-Zionism of the Soviet Union. 

   They may be the reason that a Soviet document from July 1919 called Zionism "one of the branches of the imperialist counter-revolution," an idea subsequently repeated ad nauseum by the Soviet propaganda apparatus.

  They may be the reason for modern anti-semitism in the Soviet Union.  An article in Response Magazine Summer 2001 issue gives the following 3 Russian quotes.  The Russian News (Russkiye Vedomosti) wrote:

Russia is the last stronghold in Europe and the Jews are preparing to deliver their final blow.  One of their main goals is to annihilate Russia and its unruly people...The Jewish religion preaches satanic values: meanness, lying, murder, robbery, cheating, unrestrained despotism and will to rule other nations, striving for richness, money, gold.

  Duel had an article by V. Gryaznov who wrote:

There is only one Holocaust in the world, and it's the Holocaust of Russians, organized by the Jewish Soviet power after the October revolution.

  A book "Will Putin Save Russia?" by Yuri Kozenkov, declares that

The 20th century, a century of their [Zionists] total influence has passed, and the 21st century has come, which is the century of the purification from the filth of the Zionists' leprosy, greed, impudence, meanness and sadism.  Jewish racism and discrimination against the Russian people have become intolerable.  There is no point to enumerating all the well-known evidence of Jewish crimes in Russia.  The important thing is how to put an end to it, once and forever.

The Russian People's Patriotic Party in their February 2002 organizing meeting demanded that Jews (Response Spring 2002)

must return what they have looted in Russia and publicly repent to the Russian people for the crimes that Jewish terrorists and extremists have committed.

William Nicholls in his book Christian Antisemitism, A History of Hate, wrote that:

Liberals, Marxists, and Nazis, as well as Christians of a conservative stamp, continued to blame Jews for the evils of society...The modern, liberal ideology had ostensibly abandoned mythical thinking in favor of rationality and empiricism.  But myths about Jews had not died.  In the Nazi ideology, they were overt and lethal, but the liberal world had not fully exorcised them either... The old myths weakened the West's defenses against genocide...The liberal culture of the west (like the churches) failed to mobilize the world against the Nazi Holocaust... If anything, liberals at that time preached tolerance and understanding of German grievances against the treaty of Versailles and the Nazis' wish to redress them, while continuing to believe in the possibility of peace with Germany long after it had ceased to be realistic...The events leading up to and during the Gulf War proved to be a rerun, in most respects, of the thirties.   Liberals and pacifists preached appeasement, indifferent to the obvious fact that appeasement could only be at the expense of Israel and its people, let alone Kuwait, Saddam Hussein's first victim.  They continue to preach understanding for Arab grievances against Israel and condone Arab violence and terrorism, while blaming Israel for its attempts at restraining them....Antisemitism is also mutating into new forms, of which the most conspicuous are denial of the historical reality of the Holocaust and anti-Zionism, hostility toward the Jewish state.  Holocaust denial has become a minor industry of pseudoscholarly falsification of history, while anti-Zionism is constantly expressed in gross distortion by the media of the eevents and issues of the Middle East conflict, supporting governmental policies that once again place the safety of the Jewish people in doubt. 

  Paranoia spreads through conspiracy theories to cultures which then create new ones.  An example of this is Japan which developed the belief in a global Jewish conspiracy bent on destroying Japan.  One Japanese writer, Masao Masuda wrote in 1942 that:

No country has a more profound relationship with the Jews than Japan.  The relationship can be traced back to ancient times...What is known as Judaism today is actually a counterfeit religion forged by Jewish priests who dressed up the Satanic god Yahweh in the garb of the Sumerian sun god and other gods...What is known as Jewish culture developed diabolically as a counterfeit expression of Japanese Sun Goddess culture. (Quoted in Conspiracy by Daniel Pipes p 124)

   According to Daniel Pipes, Jewish conspiracy theories have become so popular in Japan that bookstores have set up Jewish corners to handle a profusion of books on the subject.

   Fuji Co. removed Israel from its complimentary world map that they give to their customers with the purchase (Freeman Center Broadcast 2/21/02). That may have been partly a result of Japanese anti-semitism and partly a result to make their product appeal to Arabs.

  Immigration of Anti-Semites also spreads antisemitism.  In recent decades there has been a large influx of Arabs into Europe.  Yisrael Harel in an article called "The Price of Weakness" (Ha'aretz Thursday, July 12, 2001) wrote how:

  Knesset members who returned this week from an Interparliamentary Association conference report that they encountered a hostile atmosphere and genuine hatred, the likes of which they had never encountered before. Major newspapers and television stations, especially in Europe, have come out pointedly against Israel, in some cases using terminology reserved in the past exclusively for Nazis.   It seems that when the Jewish people demonstrate weakness, particularly in their own country, all swoop down to attack it with the their beaks and claws. And Israel's crisis of direction, will and military ability is having a deleterious effect on the Jews of the Diaspora. In many locations in Europe, they find they are once again forced to contend with soaring and terrifying hatred, like in the days when the Jews did not yet have a state. Jewish schools are guarded like prisons and community institutions have become fortresses. Anti-Semitic hatred, more often than not camouflaged as "legitimate" anti-Israeliness, is once again rearing its ugly head, especially in the media.

   Anti-semitism did not just infect the secular world, the secular world has it's own original sources of anti-semitism as well.  According to communist ideology religion is evil.  The communist ideology wants people to believe in Communism and nothing else.  Secular groups disapproved of by religion are likely to disapprove if religion in turn, for example homosexuals are very active in the ACLU which is trying to purge religious symbols from government buildings and religious speech from public schools.

XVIIIA Cross-Infection of Other Religions with Anti-Semitism.

    Just as religious antisemitism has infected the secular world, anti-semitism from one religion can jump to another and anti-semitism from the secular world can infect the religious world.   Bernard Lewis wrote:

The Arab reader had at his disposal a wide range of anti-Semitic literature, all of it Christian and European or American origin. It included the products of clerical and anti-clerical, right wing and left wing, socialist and fascist anti-Semitism. Some of these books were translated several times, and went through many editions. As well as books, there were articles in newspapers and magazines, broadcasts, public lectures, and exhortations, all of which helped to familiarize the Muslim Arab reader with the set of themes and images previously unknown to him the Jew as a ritual murderer, as Freemason, as capitalist, as communist, as reactionary, as subversive, and as the center of an evil conspiracy aiming at the domination of the world.[1][2]

    Bat Ye'or, in her book, Eurabia shows how the antisemitism in the Islamic world is re-infecting the Western World.   The Palestinians are portrayed as the new Jesus who are being crucified by the Jews.  David Gutman in an article titled from Deiicide to Genocide (frontpagemag.com 3/28/05) wrote about the leader of Palestinian clerics who promote this ideology:

One of the most prominent leaders of such Palestinian clerics is Dr. Naim Ateek, an Episcopalian priest and the major exponent of Arab liberation theology, a philosophy that relates the scriptures to contemporary Third World experience, usually with socialist and revolutionary overtones. Not surprisingly, the Crucifixion story provides Dr. Ateek with the strongest link between the scriptural past and the Palestinian present: It seems to many of us that Jesus is on the cross again with thousands of crucified Palestinians around him. It only takes people of insight to see the hundreds of thousands of crosses throughout the land, Palestinian men, women, and children being crucified. Palestine has become one huge Golgotha...  The Israeli government crucifixion system is operating daily. Palestine has become the place of the skull.

This theological confounding of deicide and genocide, of the crucifixion of Christ and the supposed persecution of the Palestinians, has been taken up by Anglo-Saxon churchmen as well. Take for instance, Brandt Driscoll, of the Strait Gate Ministry, an organization that traffics in anti-Jewish conspiracy theories. Driscoll, who regularly asserts that the treatment of the Palestinians by the Jews is a form of slavery and oppression, has likened Israels treatment of the Palestinians to the Passion of Christ, claiming that the crucifixion of Jesus and his passion is being collectively applied to a people. 

Similarly, in an anti-Jewish screed titled Crucifixion of the Palestinian People, Charles Carlson (not to be confused with former Nixon aide and friend of Israel, Chuck Colson), the head of the Strait Gate Ministry, cavorts with Holocaust-deniers but mourns the superhumanly brave Palestinian suicide bombers, rejoicing that they have brought Israel to its knees by crippling the tourist-based Jewish economy.

The American religious activist and paleoconservative pundit, Gary North, has put forth a related claim. Giving voice to the explicit anti-Semitism and hectic anti-Zionism much in fashion among the paleoconservative right, North has claimed that the modern crucifixion of the Palestinians will result in future acts of terrorism: If Jews and Christian Zionists succeed in this modern crucifixion, it will not produce another Savior. Not all 100 million Arabs and one billion Muslims are turn-the-other-cheek followers of Jesus. This crucifixion will produce a thousand more World Trade Center horrors.

    Notice how the attack on the World Trade Center is being blamed on the alleged mass crucifixion of the Palestinians by the Jews.

   David Gutman explains the European embrace of this theology as an attempt to shift the burden of the Holocaust.  If the Jews are so bad that they crucify the Palestinians than the Holocaust becomes more justifiable.   He also wrote that:

Secular Europe, no stranger to Jew-bashing, is also getting into the act. When the IDF besieged terrorists in Bethlehem's Church of the Nativity, Italy's La Stampa published an editorial cartoon showing the Baby Jesus, crouching in his manger under an Israeli tank, while crying out, Oh, no! They don't want to kill me again?!..

There is no indication that the rhetorical assault on Jews and Israel has alleviated the plight of the Palestinians. Still, it has had several results, neither of them propitious for Europe. For one thing, the Jew as Anti-Christ line of attack has contributed to the Palestinization of Europe, creating a cult worship of everything Palestinian, coupled with an equally mindless debasement of Israel and the Jews. 

More worryingly for Europe, the incessant attacks on Jews and Israel have distracted Europeans from their own immigration crisis, which looks to make Christian Europe safe for Islamic Eurabia. Consumed with convicting Israeli Jews of deicide, Christian Europe has failed to recognize its own looming destruction.

   Instead of facing reality and the fact that radical Islam is responsible for the plight of the Jews and the Palestinian Arabs and that Europe is in danger of being Islamicized the Europeans blind themselves into helplessness by blaming the Jews.

XVIIIB Creation of a Power Myth

    When you blame everything bad that happens on the Jews, you need people to believe that the Jews are powerful enough to be responsible for everything bad that happens.  The historian Richard Hofstadter described such power myth creation as "the paranoid style" of politics, which shifts responsibility from the self to sinister, omnipotent others.  "The central image," said Hofstadter, of this defective way of looking at how history works,

"is that of a vast and sinister conspiracy, a gigantic and yet subtle machinery of influence set in motion to undermine and destroy a way of life... [The] enemy is clearly delineated," Hofstadter observes, much in the way the Jew is depicted in the vicious forgery gaining renewed interest of late, The Protocols of the Elders of Zion: "He is a perfect model of malice, a kind of amoral superman..."

Henry Ford in The International Jew, described Jews as

this grasper after world-control, this actual possessor and wielder of world-control,

William Pierce, head of the neo-Nazi National Alliance and author of The Turner Diaries, warned that:

the Jewish control of the American mass media is the single most important fact of life, not just in America, but in the whole world today. There is nothing - plague, famine, economic collapse, even nuclear war - more dangerous to the future of our people.

After September 11th David Duke said:

The primary reason we are suffering from terrorism in the United States today is because our government policy is completely subordinated to a foreign power: Israel and the efforts of world-wide Jewish Supremacism.

V.T. Rajshekar claimed at the Holocaust Denial conference in Iran that the Jews of India are the Hindu Brahmins and that they control the media which is why people are unaware of their crimes. He claimed that the Brahmins came to India over 3,000 years ago, destroyed the glorious Indus Valley Civilisation, then killed Buddhism and systematically enslaved the indigenous people. Ever since they entered India he claimed that the Jews of India are ruling India and perpetrating the worst kind of violence against its people. So much so India is struggling as a Third World country even after 60 years of "independence".

    According to U.S. News and World Report (9/27/04) many Iraqis

believe the American superpower is omnipotent and so U.S. forces could avoid the collateral damage. clamp down on street crime, and end the terror attacks - if only they wanted to.  "The majority of people blame the Americans for creating this crisis in order to stay longer and longer in Iraq. " says Majid Salim, a Baghdad talk radio host

   The Iraqis probably wouldn't believe this if they hadn't been bought up hating America so this is also an example of the assumption that a group is evil (The Americans)  leading to the paranoia that they are guilty.

    Online videos of creation of paranoia regarding the omnipotent Jews created by the Syrians can be viewed by clicking here.

XIX Who are the Greedy Conniving Jews That Everyone Hates so Much?

Links to prominent Jews and their accomplishments can be found at:

http://www.yahoodi.com/famous/medic1.html
http://www.yahoodi.com/famous/science1.html
http://www.yahoodi.com/famous/actors1.html

A summary of the accomplishment of Israel can be found at:
http://masada2000.org/israel-stats.html and a movie about it can be found at   http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WV6K08RFRQs

   One of the stereotypes of Jews is of their being money hungry and greedy.   This stereotype arose because they were forced to be moneylenders during the Middle Ages and the people who owed them money didn't want to pay the interest they owed the Jews.  The real greed was of the debtors who on occasion killed the Jews they owed money to in order to avoid paying their debts.  While reading a book by Yitzhak Ben-Ami called Days of Wrath, Days of Glory, I came across the the will of a Jew by the name of Shneour Levi Yitzhak from the Ukrainian city of Kharkov.  In his will he discusses the Jewish attitude toward money so I include it below.

   Love and respect the Almighty.  To achieve this, my beloved children, you must set aside time for study, even if only for a few minutes.  A day should not pass without your having studied.  Whether it is the Mishna or the law of Gemara, in no way forget your daily psalm - it is precious to the soul of Israel. 

   Remember, a man is known by Kisso (his pockets), Kosso (his cup), and Kaaso (his anger) - how he behaves in matters of money, drink and anger.  Therefore, be conscientious in your dealings with men, be truthful and righteous to the end.  An angry man is like a worshipper of idols, so sleep over your anger at least one night.   Set aside a part of what you earn with God's help, to help the needy.  Beware of intoxicating drinks...Do not imbibe except for your health or to celebrate happy events or on the Sabbath and holidays.

   Watch over your sons and daughters.  Give them the best and most righteous teachers.  Do not economize on this.  Watch, especially in their teens, with whom they associate; keep them away from bad company.  Watch over their manners and language, that they should follow in the path of the Torah and wisdom and be without blemish.  Do not say that you are too occupied with your daily livelihood and warn your wives to abide by this.  Pray for this since it is in you life!

My dear children, what is the lot of man for all his travail?  Not money, fancy clothing, precious jewelry, or glory does man acquire to last forever.  Wealth is taken away from man or man is taken away from his wealth.  Even when he leaves his possessions, it is uncertain how his heirs will manage them.  Therefore, the important thing for a man to leave his children is his teachings. 

All that I say is not my invention: this is the basis of life for any man of Israel - to learn from God's teachings and guide himself accordingly.

My beloved ones, I and your  mother, may she rest in peace, have gone through a lot of suffering for you.  But all I ask is that you observe the anniversary of my death according to our tradition...ask for mercy for my soul and my spirit.  Do it for the glory of the Almighty, and  my soul, too, will benefit...

XX Creation of Paranoia by the Chinese

   The mainland Chinese create paranoia toward those who are against their taking over Taiwan.  They said that if Taiwan declared independence that would be declaration of war on China.  They accused the pro-independence candidate Chen, of putting his political ambition above the good of the Taiwanese people because he ran for office.

   When Chen won and the Taiwanese Nationalist Party lost Taiwanese fury erupted toward Lee Teng-hui chairman of the Nationalist Party. 

"He betrayed Taiwan!" "He's a traitor who sold out the Nationalist Party!"

"He's a monster, lower than a dog!"

were accusations made by a demonstrating crowd.  Many protesters in the streets said they believed that Mr. Lee had intentionally schemed to get the independence-leaning Mr. Chen of the opposition party elected, even if it meant the near-destruction of their cherished Nationalist Party. These demonstrators have no proof of this so why do they believe it.  It appears to me that they needed a scapegoat.   They needed to blame someone and so created paranoia to Lee.  He may have been guilty of many things but he probably is not deserving of scheming to get the opposition elected.  Most people try and get themselves elected.  Even if he was guilty that doesn't make him a monster.

   Creating paranoia also involves hiding information about the opponent that shows them to be good people.  The Mainland Chinese hide information about how Chen was democratically chosen by the people of Taiwan for example.

   Frank Gaffney in an article in Worldnetdaily called the Threat We Are Ignoring Now (3/31/04) wrote:

China is crushing freedom in Hong Kong. Ever since Britain surrendered the Crown Colony to the PRC in 1997, Beijing has, like a boa constrictor, inexorably tightened its grip on the people of Hong Kong. After briefly backing away from antidemocratic legislation in the face of massive public protests, the communists are now shredding what remains of the assurances it gave the United Kingdom about respecting liberty. Party organs are brazenly trying to intimidate courageous, freely elected legislators like Martin Lee and their followers by branding them "traitors." 

    In addition to creating paranoia to defenders of freedom in Hong Kong the Chinese communists are creating paranoia to Taiwanese by suggesting that their elections will endanger lives and property of their compatriots.  They said:

We will not sit back and look on unconcerned should the postelection situation in Taiwan get out of control, leading to social turmoil, endangering the lives and property of Taiwan compatriots and affecting stability across the Taiwan Strait.

   Yesterday, (March 18,2000) I was walking in Manhattan and a demonstration walked by me.  The demonstrators were protesting recent police shootings of unarmed black men.  The mayor of New York, Rudolph Giuliani, has a history of defending the police in these cases.  At least one of the protestors created paranoia by carrying a banner with a swastica and picture of Giuliani made to look like Adolph Hitler. The most recent black man killed was Patrick Dorismond.  In order to show that Patrick wasn't an innocent victim Mayor Giuliani released Dorismond's arrest record.  Rep. Gregory Meeks condemned the mayor's move and said that "the practice of demonizing victims to stir up emotion ... It's racial profiling by this mayor and this administration."(New York Post March 18,2000) Yet he did not criticize the demonization of Giuliani.

   There is a lot of creation of paranoia by the left and the right toward each other.  The left tends to want more government spending on welfare programs than the right.  One argument of the left is that there is a lot of need and more money should be provided by those who have for those who have not.  One argument of the right is that too much welfare spending can hurt the economy and result in less for everyone.  In addition it can create an incentive not to work and that can hurt the economy.  Both sides have valid arguments.  Yet they demonize each other.   The left wing accuse the right of taking away money from the poor the elderly and the sick. 

  A classic example of paranoia that I encounter often is toward the "evil corporation".  In March 2001 President Bush decided to soften the emission standards of corporations.  A friend of mind said "Now Bush is revealing his true colors".  When I pointed out that the economy was bad and corporations were probably complaining that emissions would be the final death blow my friend said contemptuously that Corporations are always saying that.  Shortly before he had told me how his company was laying off people.

  The left is more likely to see criminals as victims of society who should be compensated and rehabilitated.  The Right accuse the left of being soft on crime.

   If there is any chance of reducing the number of wars in this world, we must battle the creation of paranoia.  We shouldn't wait for wars to happen because then the battle has to be with weapons.  We must battle such creation of paranoia by disseminating corrective information.  The countries of the free world should make every effort to disseminate corrective information to the people of countries that create paranoia.  The internet facilitates this and ultimately may be a great peace maker.

   Before NATO went to war with Iraq they arranged for a mutual broadcast in which Bush would appear on Iraqi TV and Saddam would appear on American TV.  That effort was too late and too little to prevent the Gulf war.

   How do we know what the corrective information is?  We need to take the time to do the research.  We need to read what both sides have to say.  We need to learn the history of the situation.  We need to ask ourselves what our biases are, what we want to believe and try not to let those biases influence us in our research.  This is the kind of thing that should be taught in schools.   Students should be asked to prepare for debates in which they take one side in one debate and the other side in another.  People are willing to go to great lengths to do heroic acts for justice, suicide bombers are willing to even give up their life for what they perceive to be just, yet these same people are unwilling to spend the time to research their beliefs.

XXI Creation of Paranoia in America

    Ben Shapiro wrote a book called Bullies, How the Lefts Culture of Fear and Intimidation Silences America.  He was interviewed about that book by Frontpage Magazine.  In the interview he spoke about how the left creates paranoia to overcome opposition.  He said:
 

The lefts favorite bully tactic is painting its opposition as morally deficient and unworthy of being part of the conversation. The left uses this tactic on virtually every topic. Sequestration? It turns out that those dastardly right-wingers just want to hurt first responders and teachers. Gun control? Those conservatives just dont care about dead kids. Gay marriage? Conservatives hate homosexuals. Once you paint your opposition as morally bankrupt, you dont have to win the debate. You win by default. Thats the basis of the political correctness movement.

The way the Democrats handled sequestration is a great example of paranoia creation.  The United States has enormous debt that is growing at the rate of approximately $50,000 a second as of Jan 2013.  The Republicans are trying to get that debt under control by restricting Obama's spending.  Obama argues that the solution is to tax the rich but the Republicans point out that the rich are companies that hire people and that taxing them is bad for jobs.  Obama has refused to agree to any Republican spending cuts.  Instead he agreed to sequestration which was across the board spending cuts which took a disproportionate cut out of the military if no agreement would be reached.  The cuts weren't really across the board because many programs can't be cut by law.  Then when sequestration was about to take effect he warned about the terrible consequences of the cuts that the Republicans were forcing on the American people. 

      In Feb 2011 Wisconsin was broke. The budget was $137 million in the red. Governor Walker proposed a budget which would cut benefits to public worker unions.  Protesters carried signs likening Wisconsin governor Scott Walker to Adolf Hitler and Hosni Mubarak. One protester carried a placard that posed the question why do Republicans hate people? while others likened Walkers budget cutting efforts to rape. He was called a dictator by some and an image of the governor was overlaid with crosshairs by at least one protestor. A mob marched on the governors home.  Wisconsin state senator Randy Hopper, a Republican, told National Review that he and his colleagues have been receiving threats of a physically violent nature, and that law enforcement has stepped in to protect the homes and businesses of Republican legislators in the Dairy State. 

    Jeff Jacoby wrote:

IF WISCONSIN GOVERNOR SCOTT WALKER were getting a dollar for every protester, politician, and pundit accusing him of union-busting, attacking public-sector employees, or waging a war on working people -- to say nothing of those likening him to Hosni Mubarak and Adolf Hitler -- it wouldn't be long before he could personally close his state's $137 million budget shortfall.

To angry protesters occupying the Capitol building in Madison, it may seem clear that Walker's bill restricting the scope of collective bargaining for government employees is "an assault on unions," as President Obama called it, and no doubt many of them would agree with the AFL-CIO that "nothing less than democracy, fundamental rights, and freedom are at stake" in the fight over public-sector bargaining.

But they aren't at stake. There no "fundamental right" to collective bargaining in government jobs. Indeed, labor leaders themselves used to say so.

   One of the causes of the current financial disaster the U.S. is in was the CRA.  Whenever sensible lawmakers tried to curb the awful Community Reinvestment Act (CRA), a bizarre financial affirmative action scheme that forced banks to lend money to homeowners doomed to default, Barney Frank and Maxine Waters called the reformers mean-spirited racists. They even demanded that banks step up their lending to unqualified borrowers.

     On 9/11 the Barack Obama web site urged people to fight those who they call right wing domestic terrorists not Islamic terrorists.  The following was written on BarackObama.com

All 50 States are coordinating in this -- as we fight back against our own Right-Wing Domestic Terrorists who are subverting the American Democratic Process, whipped into a frenzy by their Fox Propaganda Network ceaselessly re-seizing power for their treacherous leaders.

       The Obama administrations green jobs czar Van Jones resigned in September 2009 in the wake of revelations, initially ignored by the left wing press (New York Times and Washington Times etc.), that he has a long record as a political radical, a background that includes his association with the so-called Truther conspiracy theorists who claim that the September 11 attacks were an inside job by the U.S. government.  Once he resigned the left wing media rallied to his defense, depicting Jones as the victim of a vicious smear campaign by foes of his environmental politics a charge echoed by the administrations Democratic allies. (The Fall of the Red Czar)
 

     Ben Johnson wrote in an article titled Leftist Hate Crimes that:

    The Birthers are people who believe that Obama was not born in the United States.  Orly Taitz attempted to make their case on MSNBC  .  There are pundits both on the right and the left who consider their claim absurd and perhaps it is, yet it is strange that Obama doesn't put the controversy to rest by releasing the long form of his birth certificate.  Ann Coulter is a conservative attorney who thinks the Birther controversy is absurd who pointed out that the Left have their share of conspiracy theories.  She wrote:

Which party contains 99 percent of the people who believe (or believed):

* O.J. is innocent;

* Bush shirked his National Guard duty;

* Sarah Palin's infant child, Trig, was actually the child of her daughter;

* Justice Antonin Scalia threw the 2000 election to Bush so that his son could get a legal job with the Labor Department;

* The spectacularly guilty Mumia Abu-Jamal was framed;

* The Diebold Corp. secretly stole thousands of Kerry votes in 2004;

* Duke lacrosse players gang-raped a stripper;

* Bill Clinton did not have sex with "that woman";

* Heterosexuals are just as likely to contract AIDS as gays;

* John Edwards didn't have an affair with Rielle Hunter;

* John Edwards' campaign aide Andrew Young is the father of Rielle Hunter's child.

And as has been recently noted, a 2007 Rasmussen poll showed that 35 percent of Democrats believe Bush knew about the 9/11 attacks in advance, while 26 percent aren't sure ...

Holy mackerel.

    When Obama came to office he spoke about his desire to unify people yet he has created paranoia to those who oppose his policies.  He described the Republican economic plan as:

"Let's have dirtier air, dirtier water, less people with health insurance."

Obama is increasing debt every month by astronomical amounts and when the Republicans propose necessary cuts he demonizes them.  He urged Latino voters to:

"punish our enemies and reward our friends

    On Jan 20, 2008 Hillary Clinton attempted to court black voters by attending a service honoring Martin Luther King Jr. at a Harlem church.  According to AM NY a group of boisterous Obama supporters shouted:

"You've come to Harlem to steal the black vote!"

    Since when is trying to get elected "stealing" votes? 

On January 27, 1998 CNN reported that:

First lady Hillary Rodham Clinton on Tuesday firmly denied allegations that her husband had an affair with former White House intern Monica Lewinsky. Mrs. Clinton blamed the sex allegations on a "a vast right-wing conspiracy" against President Bill Clinton.

It is now well known that President Clinton did have sexual relations with Monica Lewinsky. Hillary knew about his past extramarital affairs so but in order to avoid the right wingers gaining support it was convenient to blame it all on a vast right wing conspiracy. Or perhaps she really believed it.

   Muslims in the Middle East believe that Lewinsky's affair with Bill Clinton was a Jewish conspiracy.  The talk show host Rusty Humphries said that:

Everything is a huge conspiracy to the terrorists, On my many travels to the Mideast, I've been told by Muslims it was the Jews who sent Monica Lewinsky to Bill Clinton so the Jews could rule the U.S.

Hillary Clinton in a speech in September 2007 said that you can tell when the Republicans are getting restless when Darth Vader emerges. She was referring to Dick Cheney.

Hillary realizes that in order to win support from Republicans she has to come across as tough on terror. When asked Monday 10/8/07 whether her vote for Lieberman-Kyl would open the door to war with Iran , Hillary chafed, suggesting that the questioner was a plant of another campaign (Ben Shapiro WorldnetDaily 10/10/07). The original Lieberman-Kyl bill had a section declaring that it was the policy of the United States to "combat, contain, and roll back the violent activities and destabilizing influence inside Iraq of the Government of the Islamic Republic of Iran," utilizing "all instruments of United States national power in Iraq, including ... military instruments, with respect to the Government of the Islamic Republic of Iran." Hillary voted for the revised bill that removed the use of military part. Hillary stated, "What I have said is that I will do everything I can to prevent Iran from becoming a nuclear power, including the use of diplomacy, the use of economic sanctions, opening up direct talks." Shell do everything except use the necessary military force to stop Iran and when someone points that out they are an evil plant of the other campaign.

An amusing article about Democratic paranoia toward the Republicans titled Evil Genius Joins Annals of Dark Lords, was written by John Podhoretz when Karl Rove announced his resignation and was published in the New York Post on 8/14/07. Here is an excerpt:

Come with me, if you dare, into the nightmare vision of liberal pundits and activists everywhere as they imagine the next phase of Karl Rove's life: With his resignation, Rove will instantly be voted into the Evil Republican Genius Hall of Fame, which is located in a secret lair buried deep below the headquarters of Halliburton Energy Services. Rove will be welcomed at the entrance by the ranking Hall of Famer - James A. Baker III, who helped get both Ronald Reagan and the Elder George Bush elected and helped them run their administrations Baker will usher Rove into a private lunch.  At the table will be Arthur Finkelstein, the New York consultant who made ads for - please cover the children's ears now - Jesse Helms. Also present will be Newt Gingrich, who tricked voters in 1994 with his diabolical Contract with America

 More than a third of the American public suspects that federal officials assisted in the 9/11 terrorist attacks or took no action to stop them so the United States could go to war in the Middle East, according to a new Scripps Howard/Ohio University poll. (Was 9/11 an inside job?) Mark Steyn wrote an article about this insanity. On her winter vacation to Saudi Arabia in December, a professor at Brandeis University whose work has been promoted by the Saudi Embassy in Washington, D.C., Natana DeLong-Bas, gave an interview to Asharq Al-Awsat.

"I do not find any evidence that makes me agree that Osama bin Laden was behind the attack on the twin trade towers," she said of the terrorist attacks of September 11, 2001. That ought to win her some funding from Saudi Arabia.

   The tactics of paranoia creation were accidentally revealed by a misdialed phone call.  In 2010 Joe Miller was running for Senate in Alaska.  Here is the transcript of the phone call:

FEMALE REPORTER: Child molesters ...

MALE REPORTER: Oh yeah ... can you repeat Joe Miller's ... uh ... list of people, campaign workers, which one's the molester?

[Inaudible]

FEMALE VOICE: We know that out of all the people that will show up tonight, at least one of them will be a registered sex offender.

[Laughter]

MALE REPORTER: You have to find that one person ...

[Inaudible]

FEMALE REPORTER: And the one thing we can do is ... we won't know ... we won't know but if there is any sort of chaos whatsoever we can put out a Twitter/Facebook alert saying what the ... 'Hey Joe Miller punched at rally.'

FEMALE REPORTER: Kinda like Rand Paul ... I like that.

[Laughter]

FEMALE REPORTER: That's a good one.

 

   Jeff Jacoby in an article titled The Thanks We Owe John Ashcroft (Boston Globe 11/18/04), wrote about the demonizing of John Ashcroft during George W Bush's first term. 

The lynching began as soon as he was nominated by President-elect Bush four years ago. People for the American Way compared him to the "virulent segregationists" of the Jim Crow South. Handgun Control Inc. likened his views to those of "convicted mass-murderer Timothy McVeigh." The Los Angeles Times depicted him in a cartoon as a Klansman, complete with white robe and hood. It was a contemptible pack of smears. And it was just the beginning...

The ACLU accused him of having "led a massive assault on our most basic rights" and displaying "an open hostility to protecting civil liberties." CBS News titled him the "Minister of Fear." A song parody, "The Twelve Days of Fascism," was widely posted on the internet, including at Democrats.com (Excerpt: "On the third day of fascism, John Ashcroft gave to me / Three wiretappings / Two detained Muslims / And a Department of Homeland Security.") And on the presidential campaign trail, the candidates libeled him with gusto:
  
   "John Ashcroft is not a patriot. John Ashcroft is a descendant of Joseph McCarthy." (Howard Dean)
  
   "We cannot allow people like John Ashcroft to take away our rights, our freedoms, and our liberties." (John Edwards)
  
   "I look out at this audience, and there are people from every background, every creed, every color, every belief, every religion. This is indeed John Ashcroft's worst nightmare." (John Kerry)
  
   One of the most grotesque calumnies came from the prominent columnist Anthony Lewis. "Certainty is the enemy of decency and humanity in people who are sure they are right," he told The New York Times in an interview, "like Osama bin Laden and John Ashcroft." In the fever swamps of the left, there is no important difference between the man who masterminded 9/11 and the man trying to ensure that the horrors of 9/11 are never repeated.

   One of the ways the Kerry campaign tried to drum up support from black voters was by creating paranoia that the Republicans prevented their votes from being counted in 2000 and plan to do it again.   Here is an excerpt of an interview Larry Elder had with Peter Kirsanow, a black member of the U.S. Commission of Civil Rights that investigated the allegations of voter fraud, manipulation or deliberate suppression of the vote in Florida (A Million Black Voters Disenfranchised 8/12/04 townhall.com).

Larry Elder: Peter, John Kerry said a million black voters were disenfranchised. I assume he means all over the country, not just in Florida, in the year 2000. Is that true?

Peter Kirsanow: No, absolutely not. This kind of rhetoric has been trafficked in for the last going-on-four years now by a number of individuals. It's kind of surprising that a presidential candidate would actually do the same. But, as you may recall, before the polls were even closed in Florida during the 2000 election, activists had descended upon the state and already were proclaiming that voters were being disenfranchised, harassed, intimidated. In fact, some people were saying that dogs and hoses were being used on black voters and that tens of thousands were either being obstructed from going to the polls or otherwise harassed. There was a six-month investigation by the U.S. Civil Rights Commission . . . also an investigation by the Civil Rights Division of the Justice Department. . . . There was absolutely no truth to any of those allegations . . . not one person who was intimidated . . . (or) had their vote stolen. There was no disenfranchisement . . . no truth to any of those allegations...

Elder: Isn't it insulting and condescending? You are making a lie in order to get people to embrace your point of view and to have hostility toward the Republican Party based on a falsehood.

   Kerry by creating such paranoia created racist hatred of whites by blacks but apparently he felt getting elected is worth it.

Jason Riley, senior fellow at the Manhattan Institute shows that the evidence contradicts the propaganda about voter suppression in the video below.

    According to Ron Christie, the former special assistant to the president and deputy director for USA freedom Corps as well as author of Black in the White house spoke about the paranoia of many of the U.S. black leaders when he said: (Remembering King, frontpagemag.com 1/16/06)

Unfortunately, I believe that many so-called Black Leaders today see a world in which the glass is half empty and there are oppressors and demons lurking behind every corner. Such much progress has been made since the original Civil Rights era that we can all be thankful for.

Rather than focusing on the issues that divide us rather than unite us, I only hope that leaders such as Rev. Jackson and Rev. Sharpton would utilize their talents to promote positive dialogues and discussions to move this country forward rather than inserting inflammatory rhetoric designed only to polarize and pull us apart...

Once I left the Presidents staff in 2004, I was appalled by the negative tone of media accounts of the Presidents intellect, policies, and Administration. I was further motivated by disingenuous criticism from the liberal Black establishment who claimed that the President was indifferent or worse to the conditions and concerns of African Americans.

There is large scale creation of paranoia toward whitey in black rap music. Myron Magnet wrote about this in Frontpage Magazine 7/30/07 as follows:

Sings Ice-T in Cop Killer:

Im bout to bust some shots off.
Im bout to dust some cops off. . . .
Im a cop killer, better you than me.
Cop killer, fuck police brutality! . . .
Fuck the police, for Rodney King.
Fuck the police, for my dead homeys.
Fuck the police, for your freedom. . . .
Cop killer, but tonight we get even!

In the rap worldview, as it developed, the police actively set out to murder blacks. Did they not murder Amadou Diallo, Patrick Dorismond, Sean Bell, and even Huey Newton himself back in 1989and to general applause? As Tupac Shakur puts it in Changes: Pull the trigger, kill a nigga, hes a hero. And the song (released two years after the singers 1996 murder) goes on to accuse racist white society of purposely introducing drugs into the ghetto to destroy blacks, a widespread inner-city paranoid myth (along with the myth that the government intentionally infected the ghetto with AIDS to exterminate black Americans). In fact, Tupac raps, if blacks commit crimes, mainstream society bears the blame for inciting them to do so:

Give the crack to the kids, who the hell cares,
One less hungry mouth on the welfare.
First ship em dope and let em deal the brothers.
Give em guns, step back, watch em kill each other.
Its time to fight back, thats what Huey said.
Two shots in the dark, now Hueys dead.

In a final, diabolical turn, the police then hunt down black youths for dealing the drugs that whites introduced into their community in the first place. Instead of war on poverty, Tupac charges, they got a war on drugs, so the police can bother me. And why do cops do this? Tupac asks in Strictly 4 My N.I.G.G.A.Z. (1993):

Cause the police love to break a nigga,
Send em upstate cause they straight-up hate the niggaz.

Later rappers focus their ire on racial profiling, charging the police with purposely harassing blacks out of racist malice. Chamillionaire, in the MTV Best Rap Video of 2006, Ridin, describes looking into his rearview mirror and seeing officers smiling with pleasure in the expectation that when they stop him, theyre bound to find drugs (dro):

A nigga upset for sure cause they think they know that they catchin me with plenty of the drink and dro,
So they get behind me tryin to check my tags, look at my rearview and they smilin,
Thinkin theyll catch me on the wrong, well keep tryin,
Cause they denyin is racial profiling.

But they are wrong to profile him as a criminal:

When they realize I aint even ridin dirty, bet youll be leavin with an even madder mood. . . .
This a message to the laws tellin them WE HATE YOU!..

Once again, the right response, as Fabolous puts it in Breathe (2004), is resistance. Make sure to keep some handguns hidden away:

But I keep the Glocks in the stashes,
Cuz the cops wanna lock and harass us.

Tony Rafael wrote an article The Axis of Lunacy (frontpagemag.com 8/4/04) about the paranoid delusion that 9/11 was an elaborate ploy by George Bush to seize Iraqi oil.  Mr. Rafael wrote:

A case in point is a new book on the Required Reading list of Deaniacs, Moore-ophiles and the anyone but Bush crowd, The New Pearl Harbor. Authored by a philosopher at the Claremont School of Theology in named David Ray Griffin, the book claims to have discovered the truth about the 9/11 attacks. postulates that Flight 77 never crashed into the Pentagon. What might have hit the Pentagon, he claims, was a missile. No word from , of course, on what happened to Barbara Olson and the rest of passengers. They were probably conspirators. Her husband, after all, was on the Bush team so therefore it follows that he was part of the plot.

The book is full of other vile theories. The , according to , came down not as a result of the two airliners that hit it. Someone planted massive thermite explosives at the base of the towers and set them off after the planes hit. That someone, of course, is the man who would stand to gain the most from the incident -- George W. Bush and his SMERSH cabal of oil pirates that include Dick Cheney, Daddy Warbucks, Doctor Evil, Snidely Whiplash, Montgomery Burns, Ernst Blofeld, that guy who looks like Colonel Sanders in Monopoly, Thurston Howell III and no doubt, the ultimate puppet masters, Halliburton.

In case you havent guessed, the reason President Bush orchestrated the 9/11 attacks was to have an excuse to invade and grab the oil. But for that to be believable, you have to explain Osama Bin Laden taking credit for the attacks. Theres an answer. Bin Laden is a stooge of the CIA and the Mossad. The poor dupe only thinks hes fighting a Jihad. Hes actually doing the bidding of the man that Whoopi Goldberg claims is the dumbest guy ever to hold public office. Bush is so devilishly clever, hes convinced his enemies that hes dumb.

    After Bush won the election in 2004, Jeff Jacoby wrote a column about the creation of paranoia toward him by the Democrats (A Big Loss For the Bush Haters, Boston Globe, 11/4/04)

  For four years, Americans watched and listened as President Bush was demonized with a savagery unprecedented in modern American politics. For four years, they saw him likened to Hitler and Goebbels, heard his supporters called brownshirts and racists, his administration dubbed "the 43rd Reich." For four years they took it all in: "Bush" spelled with a swastika instead of an 's', the depictions of the president as a drooling moron or a homicidal liar, the poisonous insults aimed at anyone who might consider voting for him. And then on Tuesday they turned out to vote, and handed the haters a crushing repudiation.
  
   Bush was re-elected with the highest vote total in American history. He is the first president since 1988 to win a majority of the popular vote. He increased his 2000 tally by 8 million votes, and saw his party not only keep its majorities in the House and Senate, but enlarge them. And he did it all the face of an orgy of hatred the likes of which we've never seen before.
  
   The smears and rancor were bottomless and venomous. Michael Moore accused Bush of being in cahoots with Osama bin Laden. George Soros said the president's policies reminded him of the Nazis. Cameron Diaz warned that if Bush was re-elected, rape would become legal. Randi Rhodes told her radio audience that Bush, like Fredo in "The Godfather," should be taken out and shot. Whoopi Goldberg headlined a New York fundraiser in which Bush was called a "thug" and a "killer." Howard Dean speculated publicly about the "interesting theory" that Bush knew what was going to happen on Sept. 11, but kept silent.

    In a later article (Hate Speech From the Left 12/30/04)  Jeff Jacoby wrote:

Former Vice President Al Gore referred to GOP activists as "brown shirts." Newsday columnist Hugh Pearson likened the Republican National Convention to the "Nazi rallies held in Germany during the reign of Adolf Hitler." Linda Ronstadt said that the Republican victory on Election Day meant "we've got a new bunch of Hitlers." Chuck Turner, a Boston city councilor, smeared National Security Adviser Condoleezza Rice as "a tool of white leaders," akin to "a Jewish person working for Hitler."
  
   Even a federal judge, Guido Calabresi of the Second Circuit Court of Appeals, couldn't resist a Third Reich comparison. Bush became president because of an "illegitimate" Supreme Court ruling, he told the American Constitution Society. "That is what happened when Hindenburg put Hitler in." (Calabresi later apologized.)
  
   Such Nazi labeling is no less disgusting when it comes from Republicans. According to Bob Woodward, Secretary of State Colin Powell described Undersecretary of Defense Douglas Feith as running a separate government out of his "Gestapo office." Commentator Ralph Peters, writing in the New York Post, accused Democrat Howard Dean of using the tactics of Hitler and Goebbels to silence his competitors. Too many conservatives and libertarians refer to antismoking extremists as "tobacco Nazis," or to the humorless critics of fast food as "food Nazis." Whether it comes from the right or the left, language like that is vile.
  
   Overwhelmingly, though, political hate speech today comes from the left. It has increasingly become a habit of leftist argumentation to simply dismiss conservative ideas as evil or noxious rather than rebut them with facts and evidence.

Paul Eidelberg made similar observations in an essay titled: The Cultural Left: Islams Ally (Freeman Center Email Broadcast 2/19/07) wrote:

Bush is a devout Christian as well as a Conservative Republican .  I know of no president who has been so vilified .  He has been denigrated by the Cultural Left as a Mussolini, as worse than Goering, and as the biggest terrorist in the world.

    Whether one supports the war in Iraq one has to keep in mind that the majority of the Democrats who attack Bush for it voted for it based on the intelligence information available at the time and one has to keep in mind the scenario that drives Bush's foreign policy which is that of Islamic terrorists with nuclear weapons.  This is what Democratic Rep. Peter Stark said about Bush.

During debate on the State Children's Health Insurance Program, or S-CHIP, Democratic Rep. Pete Stark of California accused Republicans of misplaced fiscal priorities. Said Stark: Where are you going to get that money? Are you going to tell us lies like youre telling us today? Is that how youre going to fund the war? You dont have money to fund the war or children. But youre going to spend it to blow up innocent people if we can get enough kids to grow old enough for you to send to Iraq to get their heads blown off for the presidents amusement.

Vice president Cheney is the target of leftist hatred as well. After a suicide bomber tried to kill him at Bagram airbase in Afghanistan in Feb 2007 and killed 14 other people instead, postings such as these were posted to the Huffington Post blog.

• Better luck next time! (TDB)
• Dr Evil escapes again ... damn. (truthtopower01)
• So Cheney is personally responsible for the deaths of 14 innocent people ... and then he waddles off to lunch!! What a piece of sh--! (fantanfanny)
• Jesus Christ and General Jackson too, can't the Taliban do anything right? They must know we would be so gratefull (sic) to them for such a remarkable achievement. (hankster2)
• Hey, Thalia, lighten up. I, for one, don't wish Cheny (sic) had been killed. I wish he had been horribly maimed and had to spend the rest of his life hooked to a respirator. Feel better now? (raisarooney)
• Let's see ... they're killing him over there so we don't have to kill him over here? (ncjohn)
• And they missed!? Oh, Hell. Like Mamma used to say, I guess it's the thought that counts ... (Anachro1)
• You can never find a competent suicide bomber when you need one. (Mark701)

The left has been creating paranoia toward the Christians in the United States. Some examples cited by Don Feder are:

A book titled American Fascists The Christian Right and The War on America by former New York Times' correspondent Chris Hedges.

In a profile piece in The New Yorker, Al Gore compared the faith of George W. Bush to Saudi Wahabism.

In its May 2005 issue, Harpers Magazine ran a cover story titled "The Christian Rights War on America." (The left demonstrates its commitment to the environment by recycling smears.)

A professor at Harvard Divinity school said: "'The Nazis,' he said, 'were not going to return with swastikas and brown shirts. Their ideological inheritors in America have found a mask for fascism in patriotism and the pages of the Bible.'

Religion Gone Bad: Hidden Dangers of the Christian Right" by Mel White

"The Left Hand of God: Taking Back Our Country from The Religious Right" by Michael Lerner

"Theocons: Secular America Under Siege" by Damon Linker

"American Theocracy" by Kevin Phillips

"The Baptizing of America: The Religious Rights Plan for The Rest of Us" by James Rudin

"Piety and Politics: The Right Wing Assault on Religious Freedom" by the Reverend Barry Lynn

"Kingdom Coming: The Rise of Christian Nationalism" by Michelle Goldberg

   Rachel Ehrenfeld wrote an article How Terrorist Propaganda Kills, Frontpage Magazine, 12/10/2004, about how pro-terrorist outlets are broadcasting in Europe and North America.

In the text above I have given many examples of Creation of Paranoia by Muslims In America.  I give one additional example below and then discuss paranoia created by non-Islamic groups.  The following was witnessed by the anonymous author of Terrorist Hunter at the 1999 Islamic Association of Palestine conference in Chicago.

In the evening came the closing ceremonies, culminating in the performance of schoolchildren on the stage. Young kids. The name of the play was How I Became a Martyr. On stage, in the Ramada Plaza hotel in Chicago, Illinois, the United States of America, in the last days of the twentieth century, young Arab Americans acted out how good Muslim boys engage in jihad, kill Jews, and become martyrs. It was a gruesome display.

The following text is from Chapters in American Jewish History presented by the American Jewish Historical Society in the Jewish Week of May 10, 2002.  In 1928 a "blood libel" accusation against the 100 or so Jewish residents then living in Massena, New York, tore the city apart.  Blood libels have been a part of Jewish history at least since 1144, when the Jews of England were accused of having purchased a Christian boy - the child martyr, William of Norwich- to torture and crucify him.  At the heart of the blood libel is the charge that Jews murder Christian children to procure their blood, or more rarely their internal organs, to make matzoh at Passover.   Geoffrey Chaucer, author of the Canterbury Tales, accused the "cursed Jewes" of infanticide in "The Prioress's Tale."  The myth of Jewish ritual sacrifice persisted through the centuries and occasionally resonated on the fringes of American society, no place more openly and angrily than in Massena, New York. 

On Erev Yom Kippur, 1928, the New York State police brought in Rabbi Berel Brennglass of Massena's Orthodox congregation Adath Israel for questioning.  Four year old Barbara Griffiths of Massena had disappeared and Albert Comnas, an immigrant from Salonika, Greece, charged that, as the highest of Jewish holy days was at hand, the Jews of Massena might have kidnapped little Barbara and ritually murdered her for her blood.   The police interrogated Rabbi Brennglass for more than an hour about Jewish practices in respect to human sacrifice and the use of blood in food.  Fortunately, during the interrogation, Barbara emerged from the woods where, having become lost, she had spent the night in the tall grass.

Her reappearance did not fully calm some townspeople.  They suggested that the Jews had released her only on discovery of their plot.  Choosing to believe this was true, mayor W. Gilbert Hawes organized a boycott of Massena's Jewish owned businesses...

The incident ended during the next two or three weeks.  The New York Times picked up the story and made it a national event.  Mayor Hawes, a Republican with his eyes on his pending re-election campaign and apparently under pressure from the national Republican Party, issued a public apology. 

   Daniel Pipes in his book Conspiracy, writes that the majority of black Americans hold the U.S. government responsible for the spread of drugs.  He writes about the once popular drink Tropical fantasy stopped being popular when anonymous pamphlets appeared warning that the soft drink was manufactured by the Klu Klux Klan and contained "stimulants to sterilize the black man".  A 1990 poll showed that almost 1 in every 3 blacks believed that AIDS was deliberately created in a laboratory in order to infect black people.

  After the Enron scandal the liberals tried to pin it on the Bush administration one of their arguments being that Bush and Cheney were oil men.  After the way President Bush's popularity skyrocketed for the way he responded to the attack on America on 9/11 liberals realized they had to bring his popularity done.  After a contingency plan of the Bush administration to strike back with nuclear weapons at terrorist countries who used them was leaked (perhaps intentionally) several liberal groups began comparing the Bush administration to Dr. Strangelove.  After 9/11 President Bush made a statement about Iran and Iraq being part of an axis of evil.  He also set up a secure emergency government to take over if the U.S. government was destroyed in a terrorist attack.  Robert Kuttner, the liberal editor of The American Prospect, and columnist for the Boston Globe said (New York Post 3/15/02):

Whether it is an ill-specified axis of evil, or a decision to make tactical nuclear war thinkable, or a domestic 'shadow government,' or deliberately leaked plans to attack Iraq, George W. Bush in his own way is as frightening as al Qaeda.

   Richard Lowry wrote an article called "In the Land of Bush Haters" (NYPost 8/20/03) in which he wrote:

Bush is routinely portrayed as a Nazi on left-wing Web sites, which post pictures of Bush with a Hitler mustache and sell T-shirts with Bush's name spelled with a swastika. The anti-war Web site Takebackthemedia.com features a Flash movie complaining that "the media will not tell you of the Bush family Nazi association" and theorizing that in order "to offset their reputation as World War II traitors, former President Bush joined the U.S. Navy as a pilot." (Clever, those Bushes.)  "It's going a bit far to compare the Bush of 2003 to the Hitler of 1933" writes a judicious Dave Lindorff in "Bush and Hitler: The Strategy of Fear" on the left wing Web site Counterpunch.org.  "Bush simply is not the orator that Hitler was...  The web site Bushbodycount.com lists hundreds of murders in which Bush and his family have allegedly been involved, including the John F. Kennedy assassination.

    Former president Clinton also had accusations of murder made against him by the right wing.

XXIB Creation of Paranoia in Latin America

     One possible reason for paranoia toward the United States in Latin America is jealously of the greater wealth there.  Also the dictators there see U.S. freedom as a threat and so create paranoia.  Venezuela's Chavez is an example  In March 2007 U.S. president George Bush went to Latin America with the message that the United States cares and that U.S. aid to Latin America has doubled since 2001.  He was met with demonstrations full of placards of him with a Hitler Mustache and swastikas.

XXII Feminist Paranoia

    One result of feminist paranoia was an 8 year old boy, Stephen Fogelman, being suspended from school after being accused of sexual harassment for kissing a classmate on the cheek(New York Post 2/27/04).  His parents say he can't understand why he's in trouble - because he doesn't even know what sexual harassment is.  Undoubtedly he will learn to be afraid to show affection to women in the future.  As a man I share this same fear.  There was once a girl at work who was affectionate to me, and who even kissed me.  One day I made the mistake of putting my arm around her and she complained to my supervisor that I was sexually harassing her.  The result of the feminist paranoia that leads to this behavior is that men who were affectionate learn to be afraid to be affectionate and even to be hostile to women.

   In an article in the Women's Quarterly called "Sex, Lies, and Audiotapes, (Summer 2001) p7  , Dr. Rael Jean Isaac wrote that:

There is a widespread belief that sexual abuse of children is endemic to society.   This is a relatively new notion.  In fact it can be traced to a particular moment in history: April 17, 1971.

On that day the New York Radical Feminists...held a groundbreaking conference on rape in New York.

   At that meeting Florence Rush gave a speech in which she said:

The family itself is an instrument of sexual and other forms of child abuse.

She added that this abuse:

is permitted because it is an unspoken but prominent factor in socializing and preparing the female to accept a subordinate role.

Susan Brownmiller an attendee of the meeting recalled:

I have been to many feminist meetings, but never before, and not since, have I seen an entire audience rise to its feet in acclaim.  We clapped.  We cheered.

Catherine MacKinnon then announced that 40% of all women are victims of incest.

One problem with all these accusations was that there was no evidence supporting them.   The fact that no one knew about these millions of abused women, including the women themselves contradicted these claims of widespread abuse.

The answer found by feminists to this objection was the theory of repressed memories.   Supposedly no one knew about the widespread abuse because they forgot it.   They forgot it because their minds repressed it because it was so terrible.

   Why did these feminists accept with such enthusiasm the paranoid message of Florence's speech?  Why did they accept such an unlikely explanation for it?  Dr. Isaac explains:

Many women at the gathering had backgrounds in the New Left of the 1960s.   They felt their male comrades had exploited them, relegating them to making coffee, typing and sex.

Now they could show that feminists had uncovered the great American secret: Behind the picket fences, hidden by those starched suburban curtains, fathers were raping daughters to prepare them for their proper role in society.  Beyond racism, imperialism, and capitalism lay the true root of evil--patriarchy.

   By being paranoid they could boost their self esteem.  They were now the great discoverers of a terrible truth, they were now heroic victims of terrible men. 

    There was a demonstration by women in Grand Central Station in NY on Jan 19, 2019, the day of the women's march.  Many held signs protesting discrimination against disabled women.  I asked one of the women there what they were referring to.  She angrily said that there should be more elevators in the subways.  How that discriminated more against disabled women then men she did not say.  How it was discrimination against handicapped she didn't explain either.  Elevators cost money, lots of money.   NYC planners decided that a better way to spend the money was to make buses handicap accessible.  What is happening here is these women are looking for reasons to cry discrimination against women whether the reasons exist or not.  Victimhood is the route to power or at least they think so.  The same demonstration had people demanding accessibility to all of the United States to immigrants.  That means open borders.  Most of the world would flood the U.S. demanding free welfare benefits.

   Kay Hymowitz wrote an article called Feminist Fog (New York Post 2/9/03) about the feminist silence about the oppression of women in Arab countries.  She writes:

Why the sisterly silence?  It is helpful to think of feminisms...The first variety - radical feminism (or gender feminism, in Christina Hoff Sommers' term) - starts with the insight that men are ... brutes.  Radical feminists believe that maleness is a kind of original sin.  Masculinity explains child abuse, marital strife, high defense spending, every war from Troy to Afghanistan, as well as Hitler, Franco and Pnochet.

Thus the war in Afghanistan could not possibly liberate women from their oopressors: It would simply expose women to yet another set of oppressors , in gender feminists' view...

Yet this idea of superior feminine virture is becoming an increasingly tough sell for anyone actually keeping up with world events.

Mothers all over the Muslim world are naming their babies Osama or praising Allah for their sons' efforts to kill crusading infidels.  Last February, 28 year old wafa Idris became the first female Palestinian suicide bomber to strike in Israel, killing an elderly man and wounding scores of women and children.  And in April, Israeli soldiers discovered under the maternity clothes of 26 year old Shifa Adnan Kodsi a bomb rather than a baby. 

The second variety of feminism, especially prevalent on college campuses, is multiculturalism and its twin, postcolonialism...the post colonialist feminist scholar...focuses her ire on Western men...she might refer to Israel's "masculinist military culture" Israel being white and Western - thoguh she would never dream of pointing out the "masculinist military culture" of the jihadi...

The final category in the feminist taxonomy, which might be called the world government utopian strain, is in many respects closest to classical liberal feminism....The motto of the 2002 International Women's Day - "Afghanistan is Everywhere" - was in part a reproach to the West abouts its superior airs.   Women in Afghanistan might have to wear burqas, but don't women in the West parade around in bikinis?

MeToo is a feminist paranoia creation movement against men.  Betty Arndt speaks about this and other feminist paranoia creation below.

     David Horowitz was interviewed by cspan2 book program and that interview was shown on 10/14/07.  During that interview a woman called in and asked him how he could say he was for woman's rights when one of the speakers at an Islam-fascism week that he organized was against abortion.  She implied that if you are against abortion you are against women's rights.  This reminds me of a sign at an anti-abortion rally which said "Protect the Rights of Unborn Women".  What about the rights of the unborn women?  Couldn't one argue that if you are for abortion you are against the rights of unborn women, in fact you are for murdering them.  The people who are against abortion are either against if because their religion teaches them it's immoral or because they believe that it is a form of murder.  This raises the question of whether the embryo is a baby that is being murdered or a mass of cells that is being disposed of.  It raises the question of at what point of development of the embryo does it become a person vs a mass of cells.  These are questions that are difficult to answer maybe we don't have the answers.  In that case should we not err on the side of caution and not abort?  Whatever one's opinion is, the fact is that the issue is not just one of women's rights, someone who can be for women's freedom in every other aspect of life could be against abortion.  There is a reason for women to ignore this fact and demonize those who are against abortion by accusing them of being against women's rights.  The idea is that if you demonize the opposition you can discredit it and abort as much as you want.  (David Horowitz incidentally is not against abortion) and I am unless the mother's life is in danger and no I'm not religious.  I believe that a female friend that I had, broke off contact with me because I told her that I was against abortion.  In her youth I know that she had a lot of sex with different men and it's quite possible that she became pregnant and chose to have an abortion and didn't want to associate with someone who thought it was wrong.

It was 1969. Kate invited me to join her for a gathering at the home of her friend, Lila Karp. They called the assemblage a consciousness-raising-group, a typical communist exercise, something practiced in Maoist China. We gathered at a large table as the chairperson opened the meeting with a back-and-forth recitation, like a Litany, a type of prayer done in Catholic Church. But now it was Marxism, the Church of the Left, mimicking religious practice:

Mallory Millett wrote how her sister Katie Millett invited her to a consciousness raising group where the chairperson asked questions to group answer as follows.

Why are we here today? she asked.
To make revolution, they answered.
What kind of revolution? she replied.
The Cultural Revolution, they chanted.
And how do we make Cultural Revolution? she demanded.
By destroying the American family! they answered.
How do we destroy the family? she came back.
By destroying the American Patriarch, they cried exuberantly.
And how do we destroy the American Patriarch? she replied.
By taking away his power!
How do we do that?
By destroying monogamy! they shouted.
How can we destroy monogamy?

Their answer left me dumbstruck, breathless, disbelieving my ears. Was I on planet earth? Who were these people?

By promoting promiscuity, eroticism, prostitution and homosexuality! they resounded.  They proceeded with a long discussion on how to advance these goals by establishing The National Organization of Women...

Imagine this: a girl of seventeen or eighteen at the kitchen table with Mom studying the syllabus for her first year of college and theres a class called Womens Studies. Hmmm, this could be interesting, says Mom. Maybe you could get something out of this.

Seems innocuous to her. How could she suspect this is a class in which her innocent daughter will be taught that her father is a villain? Her mother is a fool who allowed a man to enslave her into barbaric practices like monogamy and family life and motherhood, which is a waste of her talents. She mustnt follow in her mothers footsteps. That would be submitting to life as a mindless drone for some domineering man, the oppressor, who has mesmerized her with tricks like romantic love. Never be lured into this chicanery, she will be taught. Although men are no damned good, she should use them for her own orgasmic gratification; sleep with as many men as possible in order to keep herself unattached and free.

    Part of Democratic propaganda involves accusing the Republicans of making war on women.  Hillary Clinton was personally involved in investigations of women who accused her husband Bill of lewd behavior toward them.  One of the women who Bill harassed, Kathleen Willey said:

Hillary Clinton is the war on women, and thats what needs to be exposed here,

All of these womens groups, theyre all pro-Hillary, they need to talk to someone like me and listen here, what Hillary Clinton has done to me and many, many, many other women. They are so hypocritical, its unbelievable. And this is the woman that wants to be president.
Read more at http://www.wnd.com/2014/02/clinton-volunteer-hillary-is-the-war-on-women/#OsmEwtJqk4pvD1L5.99

All of these womens groups, theyre all pro-Hillary, they need to talk to someone like me and listen here, what Hillary Clinton has done to me and many, many, many other women. They are so hypocritical, its unbelievable. And this is the woman that wants to be president.

XXIII Creation of Paranoia as a result of seeing oneself as entitled when one is not:

If one perceives that one is entitled to something that one is not and one attempts to take it and is prevented from taking it one is likely to see the preventer as evil.  A classic example is the belief of Mexicans that they are entitled to enter the United States illegally and that they are entitled to U.S. government benefits.  Alan Wall an American living in Mexico, wrote about this for vdare.com in Nov. 7, 01 (I am not sure about the date) as follows: 

The headline was decrying a "racist blockade". It sure sounded bad, so I had to check it out. Upon my perusal of said article, I discovered it referred to none other than a nefarious attempt by the gringos to control their own border at El Paso, Texas (the successful Operation Hold the Line). So simple border control was considered by the Mexican press a "racist blockade".

The next big outrage was California's infamous Proposition 187, which sought tocan you believe this?deny government benefits to illegal aliens. Prop 187 was virulently attacked here in Mexico, by the media, by politicians, by intellectuals and by ordinary people. How dare the state of California deny government benefits to illegal aliensit was racist, xenophobic and anti-immigrant. California's Governor Pete Wilson was viciously slandered and was probably for a time the most hated man in Mexico. I even saw an editorial, which associated Wilson with Adolf Hitler. (Which doesn't make much sense - after all, the Jews weren't trying to sneak into the Third Reich.)

Proposition 187 provided grist for the mill for several months. Almost nobody noticed an ironic fact: Mexico does not provide government benefits to illegal aliens here...

Even vicious Mexican murderers on death row in the United States areand I am not making this uptreated as victims! America is doubly wicked - wicked for attempting to bar the entry of every single Mexican who wishes to enter the countryand wicked for mistreating them after they successfully, often illegally, enter the country.

The stuff I have read in the Mexican press throughout the years is simply amazingbreathtaking in its chutzpah. I've seen the U.S.-Mexican border referred to as a "slaughterhouse", likened to the Berlin Wall (a ridiculous analogy, when you think about it, see Hitler above), and called " a modern Nazi zone" by a Mexican congressional committee. The sufferings of innocent Mexicans in Gringolandia are painfully recounted and dwelt upon in the print media, television, the movies and popular music...

The reaction to the deaths of Mexicans who die each year on the border are illustrative of this fact. These misguided and imprudent people cross the border far from populated areas, in the desert without sufficient water, they fork over exorbitant sums of money to predatory human smugglers who sometimes abandon them, or they get lost in the desert. As a result, hundreds of illegal aliens die each year on the border. But rather than blame the society which encourages them to engage in such life-threatening activities, or say that they themselves made bad choices, their tragic but avoidable deaths are blamed on the U.S. attempt to control its own border. The Mexican media explanation is this: since operations like "Hold the Line "(El Paso) and "Gatekeeper" (San Diego) have successfully closed the border at populated areas, the illegal aliens "are obliged" to cross the border in desert areas. Notice that they are said to be "obliged" to cross the border- implying that they have to cross the border somewhere, and the United States is evil to prevent thisevil to prevent entrance into our own country.

Objectively speaking, Mexicans are treated quite well in the U.S. Even illegal aliens receive government benefits and can bring suit for discrimination, and some even vote! Their children born on U.S. soil are automatically declared citizens, and Mexican immigrants and their descendants are entitled to preferential treatment over "non-Hispanic whites, and this preference is applied even to those Mexican immigrants who are themselves white! But here in Mexico, the common viewpoint is that Americans don't like Mexicans and Mexicans are routinely mistreated. Seriously, I've had people I just met tell me stuff like that.

    Pirates from Somalia attack ships and seize their crew as hostages for ransom.  They did that to the Maersk a ship with an American flag.  They held the captain hostage.  Snipers from an American ship killed 3 of the pirates when they pointed a gun at the back of the captain.    Fox News reported that:

Abdullahi Lami, one of the pirates holding the Greek ship anchored in the Somali town of Gaan, said: "Every country will be treated the way it treats us. In the future, America will be the one mourning and crying," he told The Associated Press. "We will retaliate (for) the killings of our men."

Jamac Habeb, a 30-year-old self-proclaimed pirate, told the AP from one of Somalia's piracy hubs, Eyl, that: "From now on, if we capture foreign ships and their respective countries try to attack us, we will kill them (the hostages)."

"Now they became our number one enemy," Habeb said of U.S. forces.

    This is a classic example of how America becomes the number one enemy and it is also a classic example of how perpetrators ignore what they did to create a situation and just blame those who retaliate.  The pirates probably feel entitled to hold hostages and demand ransom.

XXIIIB Eco-extremist creation of paranoia

The following was written by John Stossel about the demonization of DDT: (New York Sun, 12/19/05)

DDT is a great pesticide. The amount was the reason for the DDT problems. We sprayed far more than is needed to prevent the spread of malaria. It's sprayed on walls, and one spraying will keep mosquitoes at bay for half a year. It's a very efficient malaria fighter. But today, DDT is rarely used. America's demonization of it caused others to shun it. And while the U.S. government spends tax money fighting malaria in Africa, it refuses to put that money into DDT. It might save lives, but it might offend environmentalist zealots and create political fallout.

DDT was banned in America after we started celebrating Earth Day. Environmentalists made a lot of claims then - I have an amusing clip of an environmentalist exclaiming, "You are breathing probably the last of the oxygen!" Soon after that the environmentalists mounted their campaign against DDT. The result? A huge resurgence of malaria, more than 50 million dead, mostly children.

"If it's a chemical, it must be bad," said scientist Amir Attaran. "If it's DDT, it must be awful. And that's fine if you're a rich, white environmentalist. It's not so fine if you're a poor black kid who is about to lose his life from malaria."

    Dr. Patrick Moore, one of the cofounders of Greenpeace is now considered a traitor for disagreeing with it. David Suzuki one of Canada's best known anti-biotech figures said that "Patrick Moore is an eco Judas."   Greenpeace spokesman Craig Culp said: "He's a turncoat who supports many of the things we oppose,".  Dr. Moore wrote (Greenspirit - Key Environmental Issues):

we must remember that most of the larger environmental groups such as the World Wildlife Fund, Greenpeace, the Sierra Club, the Natural Resources Defense Council etc. do have many members and campaign teams that are reasonable and based on good science.   Its just that for the time being, major elements of their organizations have been hijacked by people who are politically motivated, lack science, and are often using the rhetoric of environmentalism to promote other causes such as class struggle and anti-corporatism. 

The eco-extremists slander corporations in order to achieve their aims.  One example given by Dr. Moore was the Brent Spar.  He wrote:

In 1995, Shell Oil was granted permission by the British Environment Ministry to dispose of the oil rig "Brent Spar" in deep water in the North Sea. Greenpeace immediately accused Shell of using the sea as a "dustbin". Greenpeace campaigners maintained that there were hundreds of tonnes of petroleum wastes on board the Brent Spar and that some of these were radioactive. They organized a consumer boycott of Shell service stations, costing the company millions in sales. German Chancellor Helmut Kohl denounced the British governments decision to allow the dumping. Caught completely off guard, Shell ordered the tug that was already towing the rig to its burial site to turn back. They then announced they had abandoned the plan for deep-sea disposal. This angered British Prime Minister, John Major.

it remains to this day. Independent investigation revealed that the rig had been properly cleaned and did not contain the toxic and radioactive waste claimed by Greenpeace. Greenpeace wrote to Shell apologizing for the factual error. But they did not change their position on deep-sea disposal despite the fact that on-land disposal will cause far greater environmental impact.

During all the public outrage directed against Shell for daring to sink a large piece of steel and concrete it was never noted that Greenpeace had purposely sunk its own ship off the coast of New Zealand in 1986. When the French government bombed and sunk the Rainbow Warrior in Auckland Harbour in 1985, the vessel was permanently disabled. It was later re-floated, patched up, cleaned and towed to a marine park where it was sunk in shallow water as a dive site. Greenpeace said the ship would be an artificial reef and would support increased marine life.

The Brent Spar and the Rainbow Warrior are in no way fundamentally different from one another. The sinking of the Brent Spar could also be rationalized as providing habitat for marine creatures.

XXIV Self Esteem and Paranoia

A series of studies of patients with persecutory delusions has shown that they protect their self esteem against blame, in such a way as to increase their sense of being persecuted possibly to an extent that they become deluded (Kaney, S., and R. P. Bentall. 1989. Persecutory delusion and attributional style. British Journal of Medical Psychology. 62:191-98. and Bentall, R. P., P. Kinderman, and S. Kaney. 1994. The self, attributional processes, and abnormal beliefs: Towards a model of persecutory delusions. Behaviour Research Therapy 32:331-41. )  By blaming others we protect our self esteem but in the process make them out to be the bad guys and sometimes our persecutors.

This may be part of the reason that Arabs view Jews as being very powerful.  Dr. Robert S. Wistrich, the Neuberger Professor of Modern European and Jewish History at the Hebrew University in Jerusalem wrote a report for the American Jewish Committee documenting the virulent strain of anti-Semitism that has taken "taken root in the body politic of Islam to an unprecedented degree."  When explaining the appeal of the Protocols of the Elders of Zion to the Arabs he writes:

the specter of such a powerful, satanic conspiracy also helps to alleviate the psychological trauma and humiliation of successive Arab defeats at the hands of Israel and the West. 

A very public display of blaming another to protect one's self esteem was made by Michael Jackson when his album Invincible flopped.  On 7/6/02 Michael Jackson took a cross town tour of New York making a string of appearances from Harlem to the East Village. At each stop he blasted Mottola, calling him "devilish" and a "racist." 

The New York Post (7/9/02) wrote that:

Michael Jackson's former managers yesterday blasted him for branding Tommy Mottola a racist, and said the Gloved One is using the Sony chief in an "absurd," "ridiculous" effort to explain why his last album flopped.

Managers Frank DiLeo and Sandy Gallin, along with music impresario Russell Simmons, were among those who rallied to support Mottola after Jackson's blistering weekend attack accused the music mogul of making a racial slur and called him "devilish."

"Tommy Mottola is not a racist," said DiLeo, who managed Jackson during the years of his blockbuster "Thriller" and "Bad" albums. "This whole thing is about Michael looking to put the blame for a bad record on somebody besides himself, and it's an unfortunate way to do it." ...

"Despite what Michael says, he has been making his own marketing and management decisions for more than 12 years. What that kid really needs to do is stand in front of a full-length mirror and take a good hard look at the real problem," DiLeo said.

The New York Post reported (9/8/02) that even the Rev. Al Sharpton  said that Michael Jackson's attack on Tommy Mottola was unfair and unfounded, and called the Sony honcho a staunch supporter of black artists.

"I have known Tommy for 15 or 20 years, and never once have I known him to say or do anything that would be considered racist," Sharpton said...

In fact, he's always been supportive of the black music industry," Sharpton said. "He was the first record executive to step up and offer to help us with respect to corporate accountability, when it comes to black music issues."

Sharpton said he was "inundated" with calls yesterday from top African-American artists and producers furious over Jackson's nasty personal attack on the Sony heavyweight.

"To call Tommy Mottola a racist is just ridiculous - he's one of the biggest supporters of black music I know," said producer Steve Stout, one of several angry black execs who rang Sharpton...

Michael Jackson playing the race card is a cop-out - a last-resort move by a guy who is frustrated that his big project didn't work," said Courey Rooney, the African-American producer of Jennifer Lopez, Destiny's Child and Marc Anthony.

As a kid, Rooney said, he "idolized Jackson" and worked on part of Jackson's failed "Invincible" album - the record at the heart of Jackson's beef with Sony. The record company poured $60 million into producing and promoting it, but Jackson contends the company didn't back him enough.

Rooney believes Michael Jackson's checkered past - especially his pedophilia charges - played a huge role in the record's lousy sales.

   Although Sharpton for once did something right he quickly went back to his usual behavior of doing something wrong (New York Post 7/20/02) and at a Harlem meeting said with Johnnie Cochran that they would take on the music industry for taking advantage of minority artists.  As Michael Jackson pumped his fist in the air, Sharpton yelled, "No justice, no peace".

   Martha Stuart is another celebrity who blamed others rather than herself (New York Post 6/8/03).  She was convicted of Insider Trading.  Eric Dezenhall, president of Nichols-Dezenhall Communications Management Group said Stewart's refusal to take responsibility no longer rings of innocence, but of a persecution complex. He said:

She believes it's a witch hunt conducted by small-minded, jealous people who hate her because she's famous.  The one thing not going through her mind is the phrase 'I screwed up.'

   Hillary Clinton, in responses to accusations that her husband had an affair with Monica Lewinsky said:

For anybody willing to find it, and write about it, and explain it, is this vast right-wing conspiracy that has been conspiring against my husband since the day he announced for President.

There is another conspiracy theory about Monica Lewinsky. Ramadan Adassi, leader of the Al Aqsa Brigades in the Anskar refugee camp in the northern West Bank said that:

Monica Lewinsky really was an Israeli Mossad implant sent to destroy President Clinton's career after he pressured the Jewish state to evacuate territory to the Palestinians.

XXV Self Esteem and Hate

   In the previous section I've been discussing how low self esteem can lead to paranoia which then can lead to hate.  It's possible there is a different path from hate to self esteem in which one simply hates others for being better off.   Thomas Sowell wrote an article in the 10/17/02 Washington Times in which he said that

hatred, based on envy, resentment and ultimately on a vicious urge to lash out against others for the pain of one's own insignificance. That has been a common thread in things as disparate as ghetto riots, two world wars, and now Islamic terrorism...

Langston Hughes, writing about a riot in his beloved Harlem back in the 1940s, was honest enough to have one of the characters in his story explain his resentment at a white-owned store when he had to "look at that window and say, 'It ain't mine! Bam-mmmm-mm-m.' and kick it out."

  The reason given by Langston Hughes may also be the reason for much of the anti-Americanism of Europe.  In a book called Anti-Americanism the French author Jean Francois Revel wrote that envy for America's super power status - has made French leaders inherently anti-American.  France's politicians, he argues, have always resented the way that America's rise to super power dominance displaced France's international leadership role.  His view is backed by historian Dr. Alan Sked of the London School of Economics who said (Europe Confronts its Anti-Americanism NewsMax 1, 2004):

France has always had Napoleonic aspirations above her station - stemming from Bonaparte's vision of la grande nation.  The French have always considered themselves to be the representatives of a European civilization far superior to other nations - they accordingly expect to be accorded world deference.

   This hostility at another country for having the power that you want your country to have may explain why Moslems speak of humiliation by the West.  Just the fact that the West is more powerful is humiliating to those who wish to be more powerful.   It's taken by the Muslims and the French as an attack on their self esteem which as I have discussed before leads to paranoia and hate.

XXVI The Desire to Feel Oppressed:

       The desire to feel oppressed comes partly for the desire for self esteem.  If one is a victim one's situation is not one's fault it's someone elses fault.  One is a virtuous hero put upon by the evil oppressors of the world.  If one identifies the U.S. as the oppressor than one is likely to identify with the enemies of the U.S. and of U.S allies as the oppressed.  The political left tends to do this.  That is one reason when hundreds of rockets were fired from Gaza at Jews you don't get an outcry from the left but when Israel went in to Gaza to stop the rockets you get tremendous outcry.

     Leftist feminists express a lot more rage about their so called oppressed position in American society than that of their sisters in the Muslim world.  Kay S. Hymowitz commented on this as follows: 

The weird fact is that, even after the excesses of the Taliban did more to forge an American consensus about women's rights than thirty years of speeches by Gloria Steinem, feminists refused to touch this subject.  They have averted their eyes from the harsh, blatant oppression of millions of women, even while they have continued to stare into the Western patriarchal abyss, indignant over female executives who cannot join an exclusive golf club and college women who do not have their own lacrosse teams.

Jamie Glazov in his book United in Hate explained:

Leftist feminists need to engage in this denial in order to pay allegiance to the party line of anti-Americanism, as well as to hold onto their own self created victim identity.  If they conceded that adversarial regimes brutalize women in ways unlike anything that occurs in the home society they hate, then they would have to reconsider whether they themselves are in fact the victims they have always claimed to be.  They would also have to question whether the community they desperately need to belong to - the worldwide community of the victims of capitalism and American imperialism - even exists.  These realities are far too painful and threatening for most feminists to consider.  A rare exception is author Elinor Burkett, a former leftist who changed her ideological views after traveling through the Muslim world.  She observes:

You're talking about people blinded by their own need to define themselves according to their own perceived oppression.  They look around the world seeking "victims" to identify with to reinforce their own sense of victimization, to afford themselves the psychological and moral satisfaction of joining hands with the world's other oppressed.  Unfortunately, since they're ultimately acting out of narcissism they blunder into the most embarrassing  possible contradictions without even seeing them.  Then, when they're called on their inconsistency, they get the added benefit of feeling misunderstood and persecuted yet again...

Hymowitz writes:  Too busy celebrating their own virtue and contemplating their own victimhood, gender feminists cannot address the suffering of their Muslim sisters realistically, as light years worse than their own petulant grievances.  They are too intent on hating war to ask if unleashing its horrors might be worth it to overturn a brutal tyranny that, among its manifolds inhumanities, treats women like animals.  After all, hating war and machismo are evidence of the moral superiority that comes with being born female.

XXVII Indoctrination in the West

      Isaac Asimov wrote  a book called Second Foundation in which psychologists made history go in a benevolent direction.  Unfortunately those with tremendous influence who indoctrinate all over the West are the Muslims.  Kasim Hafeez was indoctrinated to hate Jews and Israel in Europe but changed his mind.

XXVIII Creation of Paranoia to get Others to Hate Those You hate

Here is video which shows how Hamas cleverly makes propaganda to get people to hate israel. 

XXVIV False Allegations of Sexual Abuse

One of the arguments feminists make is that only 2% of rape allegations are false.  Michelle Malkin investigated where that allegation came from and speaks about it in the video below.

XXVV Identity Politics and the Creation of Paranoia Based on Identity

Heather MacDonald discusses below the creation of hatred and paranoia based on identity.  She discusses the delusion that if there is any disparity in the numbers of people from different races or sexes in a profession it must be due to racism or sexism and how that leads to hate.

XXVVI  Creation of Paranoia to Tear Down the System

      There is a drive to find racism and negative aspects to almost everything in American culture.  Camille Pagilia speaks about this below. 

Footnotes

1.Lewis, Arabs in History, p. 42; also see Norman A. Stillman, The Jews of Arab Lands.- A History and Source Book (Philadelphia: The Jewish Publication Society of America, 1979), pp. 113-114. For further information and fascinating reading, the Stillman work provides new and in-depth insights into the "Jewish social history in the Arab world, spanning 1500 years," with original translations from Arabic and other languages.  Back To Text

2. Lewis, Arabs in History, p. 45, pp. 38-48. See Chapter 8.  Back To Text

3. See examples in Chapter 4; also see Stillman, The Jews, "Some Koranic Pronouncements on the Jews," pp. 150-151. Back To Text

Counter Started 11/16/04

c o p y r i g h t   ( c )   1 9 9 9 - 2004 Karl Ericson Enterprises.  All rights reserved

Table of Contents